Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: N01-N14: Address Noncritical Issues #728
fix: N01-N14: Address Noncritical Issues #728
Changes from all commits
1ecbb3f
b1f17b4
5298182
507dba7
5971acc
2fbfc88
2ad851d
edfadf4
75b2974
b621adf
702f21e
98100c3
467a207
30b1ecb
e13dd1f
06bd68d
c335be2
36b4869
3df9450
813bf95
88ae26a
03a0d1a
416c1b4
12c4d53
b6cae1c
79b75ae
8ee3938
8e43769
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
N-10 OK.
fwiw, now that the exclusivity input is contextual, I think
exclusivityDeadline
is objectively a better name thanexclusivityPeriod
(...and has the benefit of being backwards compatible with what the API currently returns. It might be preferable to revert to that in order to reduce integrator confusion.@mrice32 @nicholaspai Any thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you saying this because we'd only specify exclusivity as a timestamp when initiating 7683 orders? Even for both gasless and gasful deposits?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
N-11