Update documentation

_sources/act3/part2/part2_3.ipynb

@@ -761,7 +761,7 @@
     "```{figure} https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference#/media/File:Ogden_semiotic_triangle.png\n",
     "---\n",
     "width: 100%\n",
-    "height:100%\n",
+    "height: 100%\n",
     "---\n",
     "_[Triangle of Reference](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference)_. Symbol (Beginning), Author (With),  Referent (God) - John 1:1. The author, the subject, the everything.\n",
     "```\n",
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@
     "```{figure} ../../figures/blanche.*\n",
     "---\n",
     "width: 1\n",
-    "height:1\n",
+    "height: 1\n",
     "---\n",
     "_Why have language models ushered in AI to every household? What is it about language that intelligence found its allegory?_. The artists `encodes` the referent world in language & symbol, whereas the audience `decodes` language & symbol to `predict` the next token in the referent world as well as in the authors streat of thought, as manifested in their ouevre. Those in the audience who find a reward in this game because of the predictive accuracy of their \"model\" become a part of the authors cult following. But the cult only emerges if the word resonates with what remains unintelligable to the audience, but is part of the collective unconscious. This latent space consists of the metaphysical and cybernetical (Directed Acyclic Graphs), humanities fall from grace (Dante's allegory), and the most efficient language and symbol known to 21st century man (Game Theory).\n",
     "```\n",

act3/part2/part2_3.html

@@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ <h2>31<a class="headerlink" href="#id31" title="Permalink to this heading">#</a>
 <p>Which of his films stands out to you the most in terms of this narrative style?</p>
 <p>Do you know anything about the Triangle of Reference? Well, it looks like the idea is from authors that influenced Wes Anderson during his Bachelor of Philosophy studies at University of Texas. Now, when I look at this stuff, it makes sense, but it just reminds me of, I don’t know, is it St. John or is it Genesis? I can’t remember which, but it says, in the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God. So, in the beginning was the Word, that would be Symbol. The Word was with God, that would be Author. And the Word was God, that would be the World, or Reference. So, there’s your Triangle.</p>
 <figure class="align-default" id="id53">
-<img alt="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference#/media/File:Ogden_semiotic_triangle.png" src="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference#/media/File:Ogden_semiotic_triangle.png" />
+<a class="reference internal image-reference" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference#/media/File:Ogden_semiotic_triangle.png"><img alt="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference#/media/File:Ogden_semiotic_triangle.png" src="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference#/media/File:Ogden_semiotic_triangle.png" style="width: 100%;" /></a>
 <figcaption>
 <p><span class="caption-number">Fig. 40 </span><span class="caption-text"><em><a class="reference external" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_reference">Triangle of Reference</a></em>. Symbol (Beginning), Author (With),  Referent (God) - John 1:1. The author, the subject, the everything.</span><a class="headerlink" href="#id53" title="Permalink to this image">#</a></p>
 </figcaption>
@@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ <h2>31<a class="headerlink" href="#id31" title="Permalink to this heading">#</a>
 </div>
 </div>
 <figure class="align-default" id="id54">
-<img alt="../../_images/blanche.png" src="../../_images/blanche.png" />
+<a class="reference internal image-reference" href="../../_images/blanche.png"><img alt="../../_images/blanche.png" src="../../_images/blanche.png" style="width: 1px; height: 1px;" /></a>
 <figcaption>
 <p><span class="caption-number">Fig. 41 </span><span class="caption-text"><em>Why have language models ushered in AI to every household? What is it about language that intelligence found its allegory?</em>. The artists <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">encodes</span></code> the referent world in language &amp; symbol, whereas the audience <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">decodes</span></code> language &amp; symbol to <code class="docutils literal notranslate"><span class="pre">predict</span></code> the next token in the referent world as well as in the authors streat of thought, as manifested in their ouevre. Those in the audience who find a reward in this game because of the predictive accuracy of their “model” become a part of the authors cult following. But the cult only emerges if the word resonates with what remains unintelligable to the audience, but is part of the collective unconscious. This latent space consists of the metaphysical and cybernetical (Directed Acyclic Graphs), humanities fall from grace (Dante’s allegory), and the most efficient language and symbol known to 21st century man (Game Theory).</span><a class="headerlink" href="#id54" title="Permalink to this image">#</a></p>
 </figcaption>