Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Add label elements to scheduler and visibility" #3358

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2017

Conversation

aduth
Copy link
Member

@aduth aduth commented Nov 7, 2017

@aduth aduth added the [Focus] Accessibility (a11y) Changes that impact accessibility and need corresponding review (e.g. markup changes). label Nov 7, 2017
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #3358 into master will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3358      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   31.11%   31.06%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         245      245              
  Lines        6718     6716       -2     
  Branches     1205     1205              
==========================================
- Hits         2090     2086       -4     
- Misses       3893     3895       +2     
  Partials      735      735
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
editor/sidebar/post-visibility/index.js 40% <0%> (-26.67%) ⬇️
editor/sidebar/post-schedule/index.js 50% <0%> (-21.43%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9c011c6...e5d8890. Read the comment docs.

@aduth aduth merged commit e7bdfee into master Nov 7, 2017
@aduth aduth deleted the revert-3317-update/panel-labels branch November 7, 2017 02:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Focus] Accessibility (a11y) Changes that impact accessibility and need corresponding review (e.g. markup changes).
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant