-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unpack: "equilibrium line" and "snow line" #3
Comments
What competency Qs do we want to ask of an EL that the improved model might serve? The makeup of the SL in an EL "zone"? |
If we take the Fiat Object from BFO as a starting point we might be saying that GlacierX is an instance of a material object and has a fiat object part (Equilibrium line) such that for all times t, if GlacierX exists at t then there is is a EL and EL is demarcated from the remainder of GlacierX by a two-dimensional continuant fiat boundary. |
SJ,
Interesting "unpacked" details.
I get the impression that these feature on a feature concepts
like EL and SL cannot be adequately dealt with unless we take some time,
like season or "end of the summer" qualifier in the diagram, (and perhaps
event-actions) into account.
So we always have an EL, but where it is changes by seasonal time as does
all the
other zones that help define it.
Do you think we may need to unpack the processes that affect the
zones beyond the accumulation and abrasion labels and the sub-types?
Gary Berg-Cross
…On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:33 AM Siri Jodha S Khalsa < ***@***.***> wrote:
yes, EL is a boundary. SL is used as proxy because it can be detected
visually or spectrally. But SL is not the same, and if you get into
unpacking it, you have to bring in the concepts like firn line,
superimposed ice zone. From Paterson 1981, The Physics of Glaciers:
[image: fig9 6]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10770264/39863063-d868df9c-5445-11e8-9f83-0d2a70a0da82.gif>
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJDIImuw0j7LDfeClKJed18TlJwonmNPks5txAldgaJpZM4R235G>
.
|
According to our definitions here, EL is a fiat boundary formed by averaging.
However, as @sjskhalsa points out, this is often proxied by the physical SL.
It would be interesting to form a design pattern around these sorts of fiat and material entities...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: