Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove base goerli from chain selector #7238

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 29, 2023
Merged

Conversation

just-toby
Copy link
Contributor

Description

remove base testnet until routing supports it

Slack thread: https://uniswapteam.slack.com/archives/C03ESADBQPK/p1693248493220419

Test plan

verify that base goerli no longer appears in the chain selector with testnets enabled (in settings)

@just-toby just-toby requested review from gnewfield, a team and zzmp August 28, 2023 19:26
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 28, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
interface ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 29, 2023 7:58pm

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #7238 (51702e7) into main (5478cb0) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 57.14%.

Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 39.64% <57.14%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Aug 28, 2023

Passing run #14043 ↗︎

0 113 0 0 Flakiness 0

Details:

fix: remove base goerli from chain selector
Project: Uniswap Interface Commit: 51702e7be5
Status: Passed Duration: 04:29 💡
Started: Aug 29, 2023 8:08 PM Ended: Aug 29, 2023 8:12 PM

This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings.

Copy link
Contributor

@zzmp zzmp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not remove all references to BASE_GOERLI? Are we definitely adding back support to it in the future? Wouldn't it still just be added back as a revert of this PR?

@just-toby
Copy link
Contributor Author

Why not remove all references to BASE_GOERLI? Are we definitely adding back support to it in the future? Wouldn't it still just be added back as a revert of this PR?

that's fair, we can remove them all and still just revert this PR when the time is right.

@just-toby just-toby requested a review from zzmp August 29, 2023 19:55
@just-toby just-toby force-pushed the fix/remove-base-goerli branch from 39c4588 to c8e2909 Compare August 29, 2023 19:57
@just-toby just-toby merged commit bed144b into main Aug 29, 2023
@just-toby just-toby deleted the fix/remove-base-goerli branch August 29, 2023 20:25
abarthell added a commit to abarthell/widgets that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2023
abarthell added a commit to abarthell/widgets that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2023
abarthell added a commit to abarthell/widgets that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2023
just-toby pushed a commit to Uniswap/widgets that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2023
* Add Base support to Uniswap widget

* Remove Base Goerli until routing supports it: Uniswap/interface#7238

* Bump uniswap/default-token-lists to 11.6.0

* update blockWaitMs and rpc endpoints

* Add Multicall and Swap Souter address

* Fix linting

* Additional fixes

* Bump smart-order-router to v3.16.25

* Bump deps

* Ran yarn deduplicate
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants