Flatten #270
Merged
Flatten #270
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This addressed some issues of warnings for unread assignments.
flatten doesn't work with many of the other field-level options, so emit errors when they are used together.
This will allow cheap comparison against other alternates. This required dropping the test-only Eq impl, as f64 does not impl Eq.
For flattened members, this makes the "did you mean" suggestions accurate and more useful
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add support for
#[darling(flatten)]; this does the same thing that#[serde(flatten)]does, removing a layer of structure in the AST representation to allow for "merging" two structs together.Fixes #146