Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: show unbonding status for native staking balances #1627

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

feat: show unbonding status for native staking balances #1627

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

alecdwm
Copy link
Member

@alecdwm alecdwm commented Oct 4, 2024

Before

Screenshot 2024-10-04 at 10 33 29

After (unbonding all tokens)

Screenshot 2024-10-04 at 10 42 20

After (unbonding some tokens)

Screenshot 2024-10-04 at 10 43 17

@alecdwm alecdwm requested a review from chidg October 4, 2024 00:46
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🦋 Changeset(s) detected

This PR includes changeset(s) for the following changed packages:

"@talismn/balances"

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

0xKheops
0xKheops approved these changes Oct 4, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@0xKheops 0xKheops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
checked against few random accounts found on subscan, it seems to work great :)

@alecdwm alecdwm merged commit 59ecc3d into dev Oct 4, 2024
6 checks passed
@alecdwm alecdwm deleted the feat/native-staking-unbonding-amounts branch October 4, 2024 06:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@0xKheops 0xKheops 0xKheops approved these changes

@chidg chidg Awaiting requested review from chidg

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@alecdwm @0xKheops