-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Invoke-Interpreter/PipeScript
should JSONify complex arguments
#896
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
3 tasks
StartAutomating
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2024
…896 ) Using command directly instead of variable reference.
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2024
…896 ) Using command directly instead of variable reference.
StartAutomating
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2024
…896 ) Passing Converted Arguments in all Circumstances
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2024
…896 ) Passing Converted Arguments in all Circumstances
StartAutomating
changed the title
Feb 4, 2024
Invoke-Interpreter
should JSONify complex argumentsInvoke-Interpreter/PipeScript
should JSONify complex arguments
StartAutomating
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2024
StartAutomating
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 4, 2024
#896 ) ForFile excludes template files
StartAutomating
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 7, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Since Invoke-Interpreter calls many interpreters that are not PowerShell, it would help to have a "lingua franca" to send complex objects.
Luckily, there is JSON.
If the interpreter is not a
[ScriptBlock]
, and the argument is not a[string]
, it should be converted into JSON.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: