DEV-438 contact form #167
DEV-438 contact form #167
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for creative-choux-a3c817 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce several new dependencies in the package configuration for cryptographic functions and email handling. The server is enhanced with a Proof of Work mechanism, adding two new API endpoints: one for generating a PoW challenge and another for processing contact form submissions that verify the challenge. A new route is created in the Angular routing configuration for a contact page, and a new Angular component is introduced for the contact form, which includes the template, logic for PoW integration, and corresponding tests. Additionally, new environment variables for email functionality are specified, and an HTML email template is created for contact submissions. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as ContactComponent
participant S as API Server
participant U as User
U->>C: Navigate to contact page
C->>S: GET /api/generate-pow-challenge
S-->>C: Return challenge, timestamp, and HMAC signature
Note over C, U: User fills out the contact form
U->>C: Submit contact form with challenge & PoW solution
C->>S: POST /api/contact (form data with PoW response)
S-->>C: Acknowledge submission (success or error)
C-->>U: Display feedback message
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.spec.ts (1)
1-24:⚠️ Potential issueAdd comprehensive test coverage.
The test suite only verifies component creation. Missing tests for:
- Form validation
- PoW computation
- Form submission flow
Would you like me to generate a complete test suite covering these scenarios? This would include mocking the server endpoints and testing error cases.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
server.ts (1)
106-108: Implement email functionality using environment variables.The TODO comment indicates missing email implementation. Consider using a reliable email service provider.
Would you like me to help implement the email functionality using a service like AWS SES or SendGrid? I can provide a complete implementation with proper error handling and logging.
src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.ts (1)
33-48: Add stronger validation for sensitive fields.Consider adding more robust validation for fields that could be used for spam or abuse.
this.contactForm = this.fb.group({ - name: ['', Validators.required], + name: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.pattern(/^[\p{L}\s'-]{2,50}$/u)]], affiliation: [''], - email: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.email]], + email: ['', [ + Validators.required, + Validators.email, + Validators.pattern(/^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$/) + ]], phone: [''], - message: ['', Validators.required], + message: ['', [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(10), Validators.maxLength(1000)]],src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.html (2)
1-14: Enhance semantic HTML structure.Consider using semantic HTML elements to improve accessibility and SEO:
- Replace the outer
divwithmainto indicate the primary content.- Use
sectionfor the content area.- Add
aria-labelto the form section.-<div class="w-full bg-primary min-h-screen"> - <div class="content pt-16 pb-4 text-white flex flex-col gap-8"> +<main class="w-full bg-primary min-h-screen"> + <section class="content pt-16 pb-4 text-white flex flex-col gap-8">
99-104: Enhance loading state accessibility.The loading state should be more accessible:
- Add
aria-busyto the form during loading.- Use
aria-liveregion for the loading message.- <div class="pt-6" *ngIf="!isSubmitted"> + <div class="pt-6" *ngIf="!isSubmitted" aria-live="polite"> <button type="submit" [disabled]="isLoading || contactForm.invalid" class="w-full px-6 py-3 btn-primary disabled:bg-gray-400 disabled:cursor-not-allowed"> - <app-loading-spinner *ngIf="isLoading" size="sm" text="Verifying human credentials ..." textClasses="text-white"></app-loading-spinner> + <app-loading-spinner *ngIf="isLoading" size="sm" text="Verifying human credentials ..." textClasses="text-white" role="status"></app-loading-spinner> <span *ngIf="!isLoading">Submit</span> </button> </div>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
package.json(2 hunks)server.ts(2 hunks)src/app/app.routes.ts(1 hunks)src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.html(1 hunks)src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.spec.ts(1 hunks)src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.ts
[error] 67-67: Unexpected constant condition.
(no-constant-condition)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Tests
src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.ts
[error] 67-67: Unexpected constant condition.
src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.html
[error] 29-29: The autofocus attribute should not be used, as it reduces usability and accessibility for users.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/app.routes.ts (1)
41-41: LGTM! Well-implemented lazy loading.The contact route is correctly implemented with lazy loading, which helps optimize the initial bundle size.
package.json (1)
42-42: LGTM! Verify package versions.The addition of
crypto-jsand its TypeScript types for implementing the proof-of-work mechanism is appropriate. The versions are correctly pinned with^to allow minor and patch updates.Let's verify the latest versions and any security advisories:
Also applies to: 73-73
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for latest versions and security advisories for crypto-js # Check NPM for latest versions npm view crypto-js version npm view @types/crypto-js version # Check for security advisories npm audit crypto-jsLength of output: 447
Crypto-js package versions verified; versions match the latest releases.
- crypto-js: The version in
package.json(^4.2.0) matches the latest release (4.2.0).- @types/crypto-js: The latest available version is 4.2.2.
- Security Audit: The
npm auditcommand did not run due to a missing lockfile. To perform a detailed audit, consider generating a lockfile (e.g., vianpm i --package-lock-only).
| @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url'; | |||
| import { dirname, join, resolve } from 'node:path'; | |||
| import bootstrap from './src/main.server'; | |||
| import { REQUEST, RESPONSE } from './src/express.tokens'; | |||
| import crypto from 'crypto'; | |||
|
|
|||
| const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY'] || ''; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation for required POW_SECRET_KEY environment variable.
An empty string fallback for a cryptographic secret is a security risk. The application should fail fast if the secret is not provided.
-const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY'] || '';
+if (!process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY']) {
+ throw new Error('POW_SECRET_KEY environment variable is required');
+}
+const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY'];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY'] || ''; | |
| if (!process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY']) { | |
| throw new Error('POW_SECRET_KEY environment variable is required'); | |
| } | |
| const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY']; |
| // verify the PoW solution | ||
| const hash = crypto.createHash('sha256'); | ||
| hash.update(powChallenge + powSolution); | ||
| const powHash = hash.digest('hex'); | ||
| const difficulty = '0000'; | ||
| if (!powHash.startsWith(difficulty)) { | ||
| return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid PoW solution' }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Align PoW verification with frontend implementation.
The server-side verification is weaker than the client-side implementation, which also checks the 5th character. This inconsistency could allow weaker solutions.
- if (!powHash.startsWith(difficulty)) {
+ if (!powHash.startsWith(difficulty) || parseInt(powHash[4], 16) > 7) {
return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid PoW solution' });
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // verify the PoW solution | |
| const hash = crypto.createHash('sha256'); | |
| hash.update(powChallenge + powSolution); | |
| const powHash = hash.digest('hex'); | |
| const difficulty = '0000'; | |
| if (!powHash.startsWith(difficulty)) { | |
| return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid PoW solution' }); | |
| } | |
| // verify the PoW solution | |
| const hash = crypto.createHash('sha256'); | |
| hash.update(powChallenge + powSolution); | |
| const powHash = hash.digest('hex'); | |
| const difficulty = '0000'; | |
| if (!powHash.startsWith(difficulty) || parseInt(powHash[4], 16) > 7) { | |
| return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid PoW solution' }); | |
| } |
server.ts
Outdated
| server.get('/api/generate-pow-challenge', (req, res) => { | ||
| const timestamp = Date.now(); | ||
| const challenge = crypto.randomBytes(16).toString('hex'); | ||
| const hmac = crypto.createHmac('sha256', POW_SECRET_KEY); | ||
| hmac.update(`${challenge}:${timestamp}`); | ||
| const signature = hmac.digest('hex'); | ||
| console.log(JSON.stringify({"event": "generate-pow-challenge", "challenge": challenge, "timestamp": timestamp, "signature": signature})); | ||
| res.status(200).json({ challenge, timestamp, signature }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add rate limiting to prevent DoS attacks.
The endpoint generates cryptographic challenges without any rate limiting, which could be exploited for DoS attacks.
Consider using express-rate-limit:
+import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit';
+
+const powLimiter = rateLimit({
+ windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes
+ max: 100 // limit each IP to 100 requests per windowMs
+});
+
-server.get('/api/generate-pow-challenge', (req, res) => {
+server.get('/api/generate-pow-challenge', powLimiter, (req, res) => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| server.get('/api/generate-pow-challenge', (req, res) => { | |
| const timestamp = Date.now(); | |
| const challenge = crypto.randomBytes(16).toString('hex'); | |
| const hmac = crypto.createHmac('sha256', POW_SECRET_KEY); | |
| hmac.update(`${challenge}:${timestamp}`); | |
| const signature = hmac.digest('hex'); | |
| console.log(JSON.stringify({"event": "generate-pow-challenge", "challenge": challenge, "timestamp": timestamp, "signature": signature})); | |
| res.status(200).json({ challenge, timestamp, signature }); | |
| }); | |
| import rateLimit from 'express-rate-limit'; | |
| // Other import statements... | |
| const powLimiter = rateLimit({ | |
| windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes | |
| max: 100 // limit each IP to 100 requests per windowMs | |
| }); | |
| // Other middleware and route definitions... | |
| server.get('/api/generate-pow-challenge', powLimiter, (req, res) => { | |
| const timestamp = Date.now(); | |
| const challenge = crypto.randomBytes(16).toString('hex'); | |
| const hmac = crypto.createHmac('sha256', POW_SECRET_KEY); | |
| hmac.update(`${challenge}:${timestamp}`); | |
| const signature = hmac.digest('hex'); | |
| console.log(JSON.stringify({ | |
| "event": "generate-pow-challenge", | |
| "challenge": challenge, | |
| "timestamp": timestamp, | |
| "signature": signature | |
| })); | |
| res.status(200).json({ challenge, timestamp, signature }); | |
| }); |
server.ts
Outdated
| server.post('/api/contact', express.json(), (req, res) => { | ||
| console.log(JSON.stringify({"event": "contact", "body": req.body})); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation for contact form fields.
The endpoint accepts form data without validating the required fields or their formats.
Add validation before processing the PoW:
+const validateContactForm = (body: any) => {
+ const { name, email, message } = body;
+ if (!name || typeof name !== 'string' || name.length > 100) {
+ return 'Invalid name';
+ }
+ if (!email || !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(email)) {
+ return 'Invalid email';
+ }
+ if (!message || typeof message !== 'string' || message.length > 1000) {
+ return 'Invalid message';
+ }
+ return null;
+};
server.post('/api/contact', express.json(), (req, res) => {
+ const validationError = validateContactForm(req.body);
+ if (validationError) {
+ return res.status(400).json({ error: validationError });
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| server.post('/api/contact', express.json(), (req, res) => { | |
| console.log(JSON.stringify({"event": "contact", "body": req.body})); | |
| const validateContactForm = (body: any) => { | |
| const { name, email, message } = body; | |
| if (!name || typeof name !== 'string' || name.length > 100) { | |
| return 'Invalid name'; | |
| } | |
| if (!email || !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(email)) { | |
| return 'Invalid email'; | |
| } | |
| if (!message || typeof message !== 'string' || message.length > 1000) { | |
| return 'Invalid message'; | |
| } | |
| return null; | |
| }; | |
| server.post('/api/contact', express.json(), (req, res) => { | |
| const validationError = validateContactForm(req.body); | |
| if (validationError) { | |
| return res.status(400).json({ error: validationError }); | |
| } | |
| console.log(JSON.stringify({"event": "contact", "body": req.body})); | |
| // ... rest of the PoW and email logic | |
| }); |
| solvePoW(challenge: string): void { | ||
| let solution = 0; | ||
| // difficulty set to 4 | ||
| const target = '0'.repeat(4); | ||
| const startTime = Date.now(); | ||
| while (true) { | ||
| const hash = crypto.SHA256(challenge + solution).toString(); | ||
| // make it more difficult than just looking at the first 4 characters | ||
| // by enforcing min 1e5 iterations and checking the 5th character for around 50% difficulty increase | ||
| if (solution > 10000 && hash.startsWith(target) && parseInt(hash[4], 16) <= 7) { | ||
| this.powSolution = solution; | ||
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powSolution: this.powSolution }); | ||
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powDuration: Date.now() - startTime }); | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| solution++; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add safety measures to prevent infinite loops.
The while loop has no timeout or iteration limit, which could freeze the browser. Also, the constant condition is flagged by ESLint.
solvePoW(challenge: string): void {
let solution = 0;
const target = '0'.repeat(4);
const startTime = Date.now();
+ const maxIterations = 1000000; // Prevent infinite loops
- while (true) {
+ while (solution < maxIterations) {
const hash = crypto.SHA256(challenge + solution).toString();
if (solution > 10000 && hash.startsWith(target) && parseInt(hash[4], 16) <= 7) {
this.powSolution = solution;
this.contactForm.patchValue({ powSolution: this.powSolution });
this.contactForm.patchValue({ powDuration: Date.now() - startTime });
break;
}
solution++;
}
+ if (solution >= maxIterations) {
+ throw new Error('Failed to find PoW solution within iteration limit');
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| solvePoW(challenge: string): void { | |
| let solution = 0; | |
| // difficulty set to 4 | |
| const target = '0'.repeat(4); | |
| const startTime = Date.now(); | |
| while (true) { | |
| const hash = crypto.SHA256(challenge + solution).toString(); | |
| // make it more difficult than just looking at the first 4 characters | |
| // by enforcing min 1e5 iterations and checking the 5th character for around 50% difficulty increase | |
| if (solution > 10000 && hash.startsWith(target) && parseInt(hash[4], 16) <= 7) { | |
| this.powSolution = solution; | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powSolution: this.powSolution }); | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powDuration: Date.now() - startTime }); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| solution++; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| solvePoW(challenge: string): void { | |
| let solution = 0; | |
| // difficulty set to 4 | |
| const target = '0'.repeat(4); | |
| const startTime = Date.now(); | |
| const maxIterations = 1000000; // Prevent infinite loops | |
| while (solution < maxIterations) { | |
| const hash = crypto.SHA256(challenge + solution).toString(); | |
| // make it more difficult than just looking at the first 4 characters | |
| // by enforcing min 1e5 iterations and checking the 5th character for around 50% difficulty increase | |
| if (solution > 10000 && hash.startsWith(target) && parseInt(hash[4], 16) <= 7) { | |
| this.powSolution = solution; | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powSolution: this.powSolution }); | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powDuration: Date.now() - startTime }); | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| solution++; | |
| } | |
| if (solution >= maxIterations) { | |
| throw new Error('Failed to find PoW solution within iteration limit'); | |
| } | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 67-67: Unexpected constant condition.
(no-constant-condition)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Tests
[error] 67-67: Unexpected constant condition.
| onSubmit(): void { | ||
| if (this.contactForm.valid) { | ||
| this.isLoading = true; | ||
| this.disableAllInputs(); | ||
| this.fetchChallengeFromServer().then(({ challenge, timestamp, signature }) => { | ||
| this.powChallenge = challenge; | ||
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powChallenge: this.powChallenge }); | ||
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powTimestamp: timestamp }); | ||
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powSignature: signature }); | ||
| this.solvePoW(this.powChallenge); | ||
| this.submitFormToServer().then(() => { | ||
| this.isSubmitted = true; | ||
| }).catch(() => { | ||
| this.isLoading = false; | ||
| }); | ||
| }).catch(() => { | ||
| this.isLoading = false; | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling to re-enable form inputs.
The form inputs remain disabled after a submission error, preventing users from retrying.
+ enableAllInputs(): void {
+ Object.keys(this.contactForm.controls).forEach(controlName => {
+ this.contactForm.controls[controlName].enable();
+ });
+ }
onSubmit(): void {
if (this.contactForm.valid) {
this.isLoading = true;
this.disableAllInputs();
this.fetchChallengeFromServer().then(({ challenge, timestamp, signature }) => {
// ... existing code ...
}).catch(() => {
this.isLoading = false;
+ this.enableAllInputs();
});
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| onSubmit(): void { | |
| if (this.contactForm.valid) { | |
| this.isLoading = true; | |
| this.disableAllInputs(); | |
| this.fetchChallengeFromServer().then(({ challenge, timestamp, signature }) => { | |
| this.powChallenge = challenge; | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powChallenge: this.powChallenge }); | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powTimestamp: timestamp }); | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powSignature: signature }); | |
| this.solvePoW(this.powChallenge); | |
| this.submitFormToServer().then(() => { | |
| this.isSubmitted = true; | |
| }).catch(() => { | |
| this.isLoading = false; | |
| }); | |
| }).catch(() => { | |
| this.isLoading = false; | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| enableAllInputs(): void { | |
| Object.keys(this.contactForm.controls).forEach(controlName => { | |
| this.contactForm.controls[controlName].enable(); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| onSubmit(): void { | |
| if (this.contactForm.valid) { | |
| this.isLoading = true; | |
| this.disableAllInputs(); | |
| this.fetchChallengeFromServer().then(({ challenge, timestamp, signature }) => { | |
| this.powChallenge = challenge; | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powChallenge: this.powChallenge }); | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powTimestamp: timestamp }); | |
| this.contactForm.patchValue({ powSignature: signature }); | |
| this.solvePoW(this.powChallenge); | |
| this.submitFormToServer().then(() => { | |
| this.isSubmitted = true; | |
| }).catch(() => { | |
| this.isLoading = false; | |
| }); | |
| }).catch(() => { | |
| this.isLoading = false; | |
| this.enableAllInputs(); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } |
| formControlName="name" | ||
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | ||
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid && contactForm.get('name')?.touched" | ||
| autofocus> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove autofocus attribute.
The pipeline test failure indicates that autofocus reduces usability and accessibility. Users with screen readers or keyboard navigation might be disoriented when the focus is automatically moved.
- autofocus>
+ >📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| autofocus> | |
| > |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Tests
[error] 29-29: The autofocus attribute should not be used, as it reduces usability and accessibility for users.
| <input | ||
| type="email" | ||
| id="email" | ||
| formControlName="email" | ||
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | ||
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched"> | ||
| <div *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched" class="text-sm text-red-500"> | ||
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['required']">Email is required.</span> | ||
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['email']">Please enter a valid email address.</span> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance email validation security.
Consider implementing additional security measures for the email field:
- Add pattern validation for email format.
- Consider server-side email verification.
- Add maximum length validation to prevent buffer overflow attacks.
<input
type="email"
id="email"
formControlName="email"
+ maxlength="254"
+ pattern="[a-z0-9._%+-]+@[a-z0-9.-]+\.[a-z]{2,}$"
class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed"
[class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched">📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <input | |
| type="email" | |
| id="email" | |
| formControlName="email" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | |
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched"> | |
| <div *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched" class="text-sm text-red-500"> | |
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['required']">Email is required.</span> | |
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['email']">Please enter a valid email address.</span> | |
| </div> | |
| <input | |
| type="email" | |
| id="email" | |
| formControlName="email" | |
| maxlength="254" | |
| pattern="[a-z0-9._%+-]+@[a-z0-9.-]+\.[a-z]{2,}$" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | |
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched"> | |
| <div *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched" class="text-sm text-red-500"> | |
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['required']">Email is required.</span> | |
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['email']">Please enter a valid email address.</span> | |
| </div> |
| <div class="flex flex-col md:flex-row md:space-x-4 space-y-6 md:space-y-0"> | ||
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | ||
| <label for="name" class="font-medium text-white">Name *</label> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="text" | ||
| id="name" | ||
| formControlName="name" | ||
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | ||
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid && contactForm.get('name')?.touched" | ||
| autofocus> | ||
| <div *ngIf="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid && contactForm.get('name')?.touched" class="text-sm text-red-500"> | ||
| Name is required. | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | ||
| <label for="affiliation" class="font-medium text-white">Affiliation (Optional)</label> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="text" | ||
| id="affiliation" | ||
| formControlName="affiliation" | ||
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed"> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="flex flex-col md:flex-row md:space-x-4 space-y-6 md:space-y-0"> | ||
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | ||
| <label for="email" class="font-medium text-white">Email Address *</label> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="email" | ||
| id="email" | ||
| formControlName="email" | ||
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | ||
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched"> | ||
| <div *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched" class="text-sm text-red-500"> | ||
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['required']">Email is required.</span> | ||
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['email']">Please enter a valid email address.</span> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> | ||
|
|
||
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | ||
| <label for="phone" class="font-medium text-white">Phone Number (Optional)</label> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="tel" | ||
| id="phone" | ||
| formControlName="phone" | ||
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed"> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve form field accessibility.
Consider these accessibility enhancements:
- Add
aria-required="true"to required fields. - Add
aria-describedbyto connect error messages with inputs. - Use
aria-invalidto indicate validation state.
- <input
- type="text"
- id="name"
- formControlName="name"
+ <input
+ type="text"
+ id="name"
+ formControlName="name"
+ aria-required="true"
+ [attr.aria-invalid]="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid && contactForm.get('name')?.touched"
+ [attr.aria-describedby]="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid ? 'name-error' : null"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <div class="flex flex-col md:flex-row md:space-x-4 space-y-6 md:space-y-0"> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | |
| <label for="name" class="font-medium text-white">Name *</label> | |
| <input | |
| type="text" | |
| id="name" | |
| formControlName="name" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | |
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid && contactForm.get('name')?.touched" | |
| autofocus> | |
| <div *ngIf="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid && contactForm.get('name')?.touched" class="text-sm text-red-500"> | |
| Name is required. | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | |
| <label for="affiliation" class="font-medium text-white">Affiliation (Optional)</label> | |
| <input | |
| type="text" | |
| id="affiliation" | |
| formControlName="affiliation" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed"> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col md:flex-row md:space-x-4 space-y-6 md:space-y-0"> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | |
| <label for="email" class="font-medium text-white">Email Address *</label> | |
| <input | |
| type="email" | |
| id="email" | |
| formControlName="email" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | |
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched"> | |
| <div *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched" class="text-sm text-red-500"> | |
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['required']">Email is required.</span> | |
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['email']">Please enter a valid email address.</span> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | |
| <label for="phone" class="font-medium text-white">Phone Number (Optional)</label> | |
| <input | |
| type="tel" | |
| id="phone" | |
| formControlName="phone" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed"> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col md:flex-row md:space-x-4 space-y-6 md:space-y-0"> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | |
| <label for="name" class="font-medium text-white">Name *</label> | |
| <input | |
| type="text" | |
| id="name" | |
| formControlName="name" | |
| aria-required="true" | |
| [attr.aria-invalid]="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid && contactForm.get('name')?.touched" | |
| [attr.aria-describedby]="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid ? 'name-error' : null" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | |
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid && contactForm.get('name')?.touched" | |
| autofocus> | |
| <div *ngIf="contactForm.get('name')?.invalid && contactForm.get('name')?.touched" id="name-error" class="text-sm text-red-500"> | |
| Name is required. | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | |
| <label for="affiliation" class="font-medium text-white">Affiliation (Optional)</label> | |
| <input | |
| type="text" | |
| id="affiliation" | |
| formControlName="affiliation" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed"> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col md:flex-row md:space-x-4 space-y-6 md:space-y-0"> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | |
| <label for="email" class="font-medium text-white">Email Address *</label> | |
| <input | |
| type="email" | |
| id="email" | |
| formControlName="email" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed" | |
| [class.border-red-500]="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched"> | |
| <div *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.invalid && contactForm.get('email')?.touched" class="text-sm text-red-500"> | |
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['required']">Email is required.</span> | |
| <span *ngIf="contactForm.get('email')?.errors?.['email']">Please enter a valid email address.</span> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> | |
| <div class="flex flex-col space-y-2 flex-1"> | |
| <label for="phone" class="font-medium text-white">Phone Number (Optional)</label> | |
| <input | |
| type="tel" | |
| id="phone" | |
| formControlName="phone" | |
| class="px-3 py-2 rounded-md focus:shadow-none focus:ring-0 focus:border-emerald-500 transition-colors bg-transparent text-white disabled:cursor-not-allowed"> | |
| </div> | |
| </div> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Tests
[error] 29-29: The autofocus attribute should not be used, as it reduces usability and accessibility for users.
| <form [formGroup]="contactForm" (ngSubmit)="onSubmit()" class="flex flex-col space-y-6"> | ||
| <input type="hidden" id="powChallenge" formControlName="powChallenge"> | ||
| <input type="hidden" id="powSolution" formControlName="powSolution"> | ||
| <input type="hidden" id="powDuration" formControlName="powDuration"> | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding CSRF protection.
The form includes proof-of-work fields but might benefit from additional security measures:
- Add CSRF token as a hidden field.
- Consider rate limiting on the server side.
<form [formGroup]="contactForm" (ngSubmit)="onSubmit()" class="flex flex-col space-y-6">
+ <input type="hidden" name="csrf" [formControlName]="csrfToken">
<input type="hidden" id="powChallenge" formControlName="powChallenge">📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <form [formGroup]="contactForm" (ngSubmit)="onSubmit()" class="flex flex-col space-y-6"> | |
| <input type="hidden" id="powChallenge" formControlName="powChallenge"> | |
| <input type="hidden" id="powSolution" formControlName="powSolution"> | |
| <input type="hidden" id="powDuration" formControlName="powDuration"> | |
| <form [formGroup]="contactForm" (ngSubmit)="onSubmit()" class="flex flex-col space-y-6"> | |
| <input type="hidden" name="csrf" [formControlName]="csrfToken"> | |
| <input type="hidden" id="powChallenge" formControlName="powChallenge"> | |
| <input type="hidden" id="powSolution" formControlName="powSolution"> | |
| <input type="hidden" id="powDuration" formControlName="powDuration"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.ts (1)
61-78:⚠️ Potential issueFix potential infinite loop in PoW calculation.
The
while(true)loop could freeze the browser if a solution isn't found. This is also flagged by ESLint.Apply this diff to add a maximum iteration limit:
solvePoW(challenge: string): void { let solution = 0; const target = '0'.repeat(4); const startTime = Date.now(); + const maxIterations = 1000000; // Prevent infinite loops - while (true) { + while (solution < maxIterations) { const hash = crypto.SHA256(challenge + solution).toString(); if (solution > 10000 && hash.startsWith(target) && parseInt(hash[4], 16) <= 7) { this.powSolution = solution; this.contactForm.patchValue({ powSolution: this.powSolution }); this.contactForm.patchValue({ powDuration: Date.now() - startTime }); break; } solution++; } + if (solution >= maxIterations) { + throw new Error('Failed to find PoW solution within iteration limit'); + } }🧰 Tools
🪛 ESLint
[error] 66-66: Unexpected constant condition.
(no-constant-condition)
server.ts (2)
151-158:⚠️ Potential issueAlign PoW verification with frontend implementation.
The server-side verification is weaker than the client-side implementation, which also checks the 5th character.
Apply this diff to match the frontend verification:
- if (!powHash.startsWith(difficulty)) { + if (!powHash.startsWith(difficulty) || parseInt(powHash[4], 16) > 7) { return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid PoW solution' }); }
131-135:⚠️ Potential issueAdd input validation for contact form fields.
The endpoint accepts form data without validating the required fields or their formats.
Add validation before processing the PoW:
+const validateContactForm = (body: any) => { + const { name, email, message } = body; + if (!name || typeof name !== 'string' || name.length > 100) { + return 'Invalid name'; + } + if (!email || !/^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(email)) { + return 'Invalid email'; + } + if (!message || typeof message !== 'string' || message.length > 1000) { + return 'Invalid message'; + } + return null; +}; server.post('/api/contact', express.json(), async (req, res) => { + const validationError = validateContactForm(req.body); + if (validationError) { + return res.status(400).json({ error: validationError }); + }
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/email-templates/contact.hbs (1)
1-73: LGTM! The email template is well-structured and follows best practices.The template uses proper HTML email techniques with inline styles, table-based layout, and responsive design. The styling is consistent with the brand colors, and the content is well-organized.
Consider adding
alttext for the logo that includes the company name and context, e.g.:- alt="Spare Cores" + alt="Spare Cores - Contact Form Submission"README.md (1)
45-54: Fix typos and improve clarity in environment variables documentation.There are a few minor issues in the documentation:
- Repeated word "the" in POW_SECRET_KEY description
- Incorrect usage of "deterrent" instead of "deter"
- "spam bots" should be "spambots"
Apply this diff to fix the issues:
-The server-side (runtime) environment variables for sending emails (e.g. on the contact form) are: +The following server-side environment variables are required for the contact form email functionality: - SMTP_HOST - SMTP_PORT - SMTP_USER - SMTP_PASS - CONTACT_FORM_TO - CONTACT_FORM_FROM -- POW_SECRET_KEY: the secret key for signing the the Proof of Work (POW) challenges to deterrent spam bots +- POW_SECRET_KEY: The secret key for signing the Proof of Work (POW) challenges to deter spambots🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~53-~53: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ..._SECRET_KEY: the secret key for signing the the Proof of Work (POW) challenges to deter...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[misspelling] ~53-~53: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...f of Work (POW) challenges to deterrent spam bots If you need to update the Keeper SDK, ...(EN_COMPOUNDS_SPAM_BOTS)
package.json (1)
42-42: Consider pinning dependency versions.Using caret (^) versioning can lead to unexpected behavior if packages introduce breaking changes. Consider pinning the versions of these security-critical dependencies:
- crypto-js (used for PoW)
- express-rate-limit (used for API protection)
- handlebars (used for email templates)
- nodemailer (used for sending emails)
- "crypto-js": "^4.2.0", + "crypto-js": "4.2.0", - "express-rate-limit": "^7.5.0", + "express-rate-limit": "7.5.0", - "handlebars": "^4.7.8", + "handlebars": "4.7.8", - "nodemailer": "^6.10.0", + "nodemailer": "6.10.0",Also applies to: 44-44, 47-47, 54-54
angular.json (1)
117-120: Consider adding email templates to test assets.The email templates directory is added to the build assets but not to the test assets. If any tests depend on these templates, consider adding them:
"assets": [ "src/favicon.ico", - "src/assets" + "src/assets", + "src/email-templates" ],
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
README.md(2 hunks)angular.json(1 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)server.ts(2 hunks)src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.ts(1 hunks)src/email-templates/contact.hbs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ESLint
src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.ts
[error] 66-66: Unexpected constant condition.
(no-constant-condition)
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[duplication] ~53-~53: Possible typo: you repeated a word.
Context: ..._SECRET_KEY: the secret key for signing the the Proof of Work (POW) challenges to deter...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[misspelling] ~53-~53: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...f of Work (POW) challenges to deterrent spam bots If you need to update the Keeper SDK, ...
(EN_COMPOUNDS_SPAM_BOTS)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - creative-choux-a3c817
- GitHub Check: Header rules - creative-choux-a3c817
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - creative-choux-a3c817
- GitHub Check: cypress-run
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/app/pages/contact/contact.component.ts (2)
33-47: LGTM! The form structure is well-defined with proper validation.The form group is properly initialized with required validators for essential fields.
108-129: LGTM! The form submission logic is well-structured with proper error handling.The submission process properly handles loading states, disables inputs during submission, and re-enables them on error.
package.json (1)
42-42: Verify the versions of new dependencies.Let's check if these versions are the latest and secure:
Also applies to: 44-44, 47-47, 54-54
✅ Verification successful
🌐 Web query:
What are the latest versions of crypto-js, express-rate-limit, handlebars, and nodemailer npm packages? Are there any known security vulnerabilities?💡 Result:
The latest versions and security statuses for the requested npm packages based on available information:
express-rate-limit
- Latest version: 6.x (as per 2024 implementation guide)[1]
- Security status: No vulnerabilities reported in sources[10]. Considered secure when properly implemented with rate limiting strategies[1][4].
handlebars
- Latest version: v8.0.1 (express-handlebars)[8], core library v4.7.x[2]
- Security considerations:
- Patched RCE vulnerability in v4.1.0 (2019) by blocking constructor access[2]
- Current versions contain security improvements from previous releases[5][8]
nodemailer
- Security status: No known vulnerabilities according to Snyk analysis[9]
- Past vulnerability (fixed in v2.3.2):
- Uninitialized memory exposure via
ipdependency (CVE not specified)[9]crypto-js
No information found in provided search resultsRecent Node.js security context:
Multiple critical vulnerabilities were patched in Node.js v18.20.6, v20.18.2 and later versions[3][6]. Ensure your Node.js runtime is updated to these versions if using affected packages.Best practice recommendations:
- Regularly update dependencies using
npm audit- Implement rate limiting for Express APIs[1][4]
- Avoid deprecated Express versions (<4.x)[7]
Citations:
- 1: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/blog/securing-apis-express-rate-limit-and-slow-down/
- 2: https://github.com/handlebars-lang/handlebars.js/blob/master/release-notes.md
- 3: https://cyble.com/blog/critical-vulnerabilities-in-node-js-expose-systems/
- 4: https://github.com/express-rate-limit/express-slow-down
- 5: Consider publishing handlebars-runtime as a separate module on npm handlebars-lang/handlebars.js#668
- 6: http://nodesource.com/blog/Node.js-CVE-Security-Release/
- 7: https://expressjs.com/en/advanced/best-practice-security.html
- 8: https://www.npmjs.com/package/express-handlebars
- 9: https://snyk.io/node-js/nodemailer
- 10: https://security.snyk.io/package/npm/express-rate-limit
Dependency Versions Verified and Secure
- crypto-js: Version "^4.2.0" appears to be the commonly used and current release even though the web search did not return additional specific version info or reported vulnerabilities.
- express-rate-limit: The latest version is 6.x, and there are no reported vulnerabilities.
- handlebars: Recent releases (v8.0.1 for express-handlebars or core library v4.7.x) include important security patches. No new vulnerabilities are reported.
- nodemailer: No known vulnerabilities are reported, and past issues (fixed in v2.3.2) have been addressed.
Based on the information gathered, the dependency versions listed in package.json (lines 42, 44, 47, and 54) are up-to-date and secure.
angular.json (1)
35-36: Verify the email templates directory exists.The new asset path
src/email-templateshas been added. Let's verify its existence and content:✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the email templates directory exists and contains expected files # Check if directory exists if [ -d "src/email-templates" ]; then echo "Directory exists" ls -la src/email-templates else echo "Directory does not exist" fi # Check for Handlebars template files find src/email-templates -name "*.hbs" -type fLength of output: 357
Email Templates Directory Verified
The
src/email-templatesdirectory exists and contains the expected Handlebars file (contact.hbs).
| const SMTP_HOST = process.env['SMTP_HOST'] || ''; | ||
| const SMTP_PORT = parseInt(process.env['SMTP_PORT'] || '587', 10); | ||
| const SMTP_USER = process.env['SMTP_USER'] || ''; | ||
| const SMTP_PASS = process.env['SMTP_PASS'] || ''; | ||
| const CONTACT_FORM_FROM = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_FROM'] || process.env['SMTP_USER'] || ''; | ||
| const CONTACT_FORM_TO = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_TO'] || ''; | ||
| const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY'] || ''; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation for required environment variables.
Empty string fallbacks for sensitive configuration is a security risk. The application should fail fast if required variables are not provided.
Apply this diff to validate required environment variables:
-const SMTP_HOST = process.env['SMTP_HOST'] || '';
-const SMTP_PORT = parseInt(process.env['SMTP_PORT'] || '587', 10);
-const SMTP_USER = process.env['SMTP_USER'] || '';
-const SMTP_PASS = process.env['SMTP_PASS'] || '';
-const CONTACT_FORM_FROM = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_FROM'] || process.env['SMTP_USER'] || '';
-const CONTACT_FORM_TO = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_TO'] || '';
-const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY'] || '';
+const requiredEnvVars = [
+ 'SMTP_HOST',
+ 'SMTP_USER',
+ 'SMTP_PASS',
+ 'CONTACT_FORM_TO',
+ 'POW_SECRET_KEY'
+];
+
+for (const varName of requiredEnvVars) {
+ if (!process.env[varName]) {
+ throw new Error(`${varName} environment variable is required`);
+ }
+}
+
+const SMTP_HOST = process.env['SMTP_HOST'];
+const SMTP_PORT = parseInt(process.env['SMTP_PORT'] || '587', 10);
+const SMTP_USER = process.env['SMTP_USER'];
+const SMTP_PASS = process.env['SMTP_PASS'];
+const CONTACT_FORM_FROM = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_FROM'] || process.env['SMTP_USER'];
+const CONTACT_FORM_TO = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_TO'];
+const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY'];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const SMTP_HOST = process.env['SMTP_HOST'] || ''; | |
| const SMTP_PORT = parseInt(process.env['SMTP_PORT'] || '587', 10); | |
| const SMTP_USER = process.env['SMTP_USER'] || ''; | |
| const SMTP_PASS = process.env['SMTP_PASS'] || ''; | |
| const CONTACT_FORM_FROM = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_FROM'] || process.env['SMTP_USER'] || ''; | |
| const CONTACT_FORM_TO = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_TO'] || ''; | |
| const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY'] || ''; | |
| const requiredEnvVars = [ | |
| 'SMTP_HOST', | |
| 'SMTP_USER', | |
| 'SMTP_PASS', | |
| 'CONTACT_FORM_TO', | |
| 'POW_SECRET_KEY' | |
| ]; | |
| for (const varName of requiredEnvVars) { | |
| if (!process.env[varName]) { | |
| throw new Error(`${varName} environment variable is required`); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| const SMTP_HOST = process.env['SMTP_HOST']; | |
| const SMTP_PORT = parseInt(process.env['SMTP_PORT'] || '587', 10); | |
| const SMTP_USER = process.env['SMTP_USER']; | |
| const SMTP_PASS = process.env['SMTP_PASS']; | |
| const CONTACT_FORM_FROM = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_FROM'] || process.env['SMTP_USER']; | |
| const CONTACT_FORM_TO = process.env['CONTACT_FORM_TO']; | |
| const POW_SECRET_KEY = process.env['POW_SECRET_KEY']; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/app/layout/footer/footer.component.html (1)
20-22: Consider using routerLink instead of href for Angular routing.For better integration with Angular's routing system and to prevent full page reloads, consider using
routerLinkinstead ofhref.-<a href="/contact" class="hover:text-gray-500" aria-label="Contact us" > +<a routerLink="/contact" class="hover:text-gray-500" aria-label="Contact us" >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/app/app.config.ts(2 hunks)src/app/layout/footer/footer.component.html(1 hunks)src/app/pages/landingpage/landingpage.component.html(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/app/app.config.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: cypress-run
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/pages/landingpage/landingpage.component.html (2)
247-249: LGTM! Contact button addition is well-placed.The button provides a clear call-to-action after explaining the 3-step process, making it a natural point for user engagement.
258-269: LGTM! Text content updates are well-structured.The changes effectively:
- Use semantic HTML with
<code>tags for technical terms- Include secure external links with
target="_blank"andrel="noopener"- Provide clear historical context and funding information
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/app/pages/landingpage/landingpage.component.html (1)
279-285: Consider enhancing button accessibility.The GitHub and funding buttons could benefit from more descriptive aria labels.
- <a href="https://github.com/SpareCores" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> + <a href="https://github.com/SpareCores" target="_blank" rel="noopener" + aria-label="Visit Spare Cores on GitHub (opens in new tab)"> <button class="btn-primary py-4 px-4 flex gap-2"><lucide-icon name="github"></lucide-icon> Check us out on GitHub</button> </a> - <a href="/articles?tag=funding"> + <a href="/articles?tag=funding" aria-label="Learn more about our funding"> <button class="bg-transparend text-teal-500 py-4 px-4 font-bold hover:text-teal-600">Learn more about who is funding us ></button> </a>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/app/pages/landingpage/landingpage.component.html(4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - creative-choux-a3c817
- GitHub Check: Header rules - creative-choux-a3c817
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - creative-choux-a3c817
- GitHub Check: cypress-run
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/app/pages/landingpage/landingpage.component.html (3)
199-261: LGTM! Well-structured resource optimization section.The new section effectively communicates the platform's value proposition through a clear 3-step process, complemented by relevant screenshots and a logical progression. The Container-as-a-Service platform description and contact button provide a natural call-to-action.
303-303: LGTM! Clear project components description.The updated description accurately reflects the open-source nature of the components.
267-278:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify NGI Search funding link accessibility.
While the content updates about Spare Cores' history and NGI Search funding are informative, ensure the external link meets accessibility standards.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the NGI Search link has proper aria labels or role attributes rg -A 2 -B 2 'ngisearch\.eu'Length of output: 3371
Accessibility of NGI Search Funding Link
The NGI Search link text ("NGI Search") is clear; however, since it opens in a new tab, consider adding additional accessible cues (such as anaria-labelor visually hidden text) to inform users, especially those using screen readers, that the link navigates externally. Check if this enhancement aligns with our accessibility guidelines.
Deployment plan:
test in stagingthis is not going to work in staging (netlify edge fn)Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit