Add context pane to right-side navigation area #172
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce several new files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Southclaws
force-pushed
the
rework-large-dpi-layout
branch
from
57dab0a to
5b8d0cb
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
web/src/app/providers.tsx (1)
20-24: LGTM: Repositioning of Toaster and childrenThe
Toastercomponent andchildrenare correctly positioned within theNavigationProvider. This allows both to access the navigation context if needed.Minor suggestion: Consider removing the empty lines and comments around
childrenfor better code clarity, unless they serve a specific purpose:<NavigationProvider> <Toaster /> - - {/* -- */} {children} - {/* -- */} </NavigationProvider>web/src/components/site/Navigation/Navigation.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-60: Summary: Navigation component updated, but further context needed.The changes to the Navigation component are minimal but impactful. The
Rightcomponent is now imported and rendered, which aligns with the PR objective of implementing a right bar contextual element. However, the portal implementation mentioned in the PR description is not visible in this file.To ensure a comprehensive understanding of the changes:
- Please provide more context on how the portal is being used, possibly in other related files.
- Consider adding comments or documentation to explain the purpose and functionality of the
Rightcomponent, especially if it's implementing complex logic or state management.- It might be beneficial to review the
Rightcomponent implementation to ensure it properly integrates with the Navigation component and meets the PR objectives.web/src/components/site/Navigation/Right/Right.tsx (1)
9-9: Assess if using a portal aligns with the desired architectural approachConsidering the PR objective mentions uncertainty about using
createPortal, it's worth evaluating if this is the optimal solution for rendering contextual content in theRightcomponent.Using a portal is suitable when you need to render content outside the parent DOM hierarchy, but if the content can be managed within the existing component tree through context or props, it might simplify the implementation.
Would you like to discuss alternative approaches to manage the right panel's content without using a portal?
web/src/components/site/Navigation/Right/context.tsx (1)
46-50: Simplify 'RightNavPortal' by removing unnecessary FragmentThe Fragment (
<>...</>) wrappingcreatePortalis unnecessary sincecreatePortalreturns a single child. Removing it simplifies the code.Apply this diff to streamline the return statement:
export function RightNavPortal({ children }: PropsWithChildren) { const { ref } = useRightPortalRef(); if (!ref) return null; - return <>{createPortal(children, ref)}</>; + return createPortal(children, ref); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- web/src/app/providers.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/Navigation.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/Right/Right.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/Right/context.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/navigation.module.css (3 hunks)
- web/src/screens/thread/ThreadScreen/ThreadScreen.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
web/src/app/providers.tsx (2)
9-10: LGTM: New import for NavigationProviderThe import statement for
NavigationProvideris correctly added and follows the project's import conventions using the "@/" alias.
19-25: Verify the implementation of NavigationProviderThe
NavigationProvideris correctly placed to wrap both theToasterand the main application content, which aligns with the PR objective. This structure will make the navigation context available throughout the application.However, given that the PR description mentions this as an experimental implementation, could you confirm if this is the intended structure? Are there any specific concerns or alternatives you considered?
web/src/components/site/Navigation/Navigation.tsx (2)
11-11: LGTM: Import statement for Right component added correctly.The import statement for the
Rightcomponent is properly formatted and consistent with other imports in the file. This addition is necessary for the subsequent usage of theRightcomponent in the Navigation layout.
51-51: Rendering of Right component looks good, but clarification needed on portal usage.The
Rightcomponent is now correctly rendered within therightbarBox, which aligns with the PR objective of implementing a right bar contextual element. However, the PR description mentions the use ofcreatePortal, which is not evident in this file.Could you please clarify where and how the portal is being implemented? It might be helpful to run the following script to search for portal usage in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Rendering of the
Rightcomponent is correctly implemented.The
createPortalfunction is utilized inweb/src/components/site/Navigation/Right/context.tsx, ensuring that the portal functionality is properly integrated. The placement of theRightcomponent within therightbarBox aligns with the PR objective of implementing a right bar contextual element.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for createPortal usage in the codebase # Test: Search for createPortal usage rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'createPortal'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for createPortal usage in TypeScript and TypeScript React files # Corrected: Use proper type identifiers 'ts' and 'tsx' rg --type ts --type tsx 'createPortal'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for createPortal usage in .ts and .tsx files rg 'createPortal' -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 231
web/src/screens/thread/ThreadScreen/ThreadScreen.tsx (2)
13-13: LGTM: New import for RightNavPortalThe import statement for
RightNavPortalis correctly added and aligns with the PR objectives of implementing a right bar contextual via portal.
37-41: LGTM: RightNavPortal implementationThe
RightNavPortalis appropriately used to wrap the thread title and metadata, which aligns with the PR objectives of implementing a right bar contextual via portal. This addition enhances the user interface by providing a dedicated navigation area on the right side of the screen.web/src/components/site/Navigation/Right/Right.tsx (2)
9-11: Confirm thattargetRef.currentis properly initialized before accessingchildrenAccessing
targetRef.current?.childrenassumes thattargetRef.currentis notnullorundefined. While the optional chaining helps, it's good practice to ensure thattargetRef.currentis initialized before using it, especially if there's a possibility that it might not be available immediately.Consider adding a check or ensuring that
targetRefis initialized appropriately.
1-18: Overall implementation aligns with the intended functionalityThe
Rightcomponent effectively utilizesuseRightPortalRefto conditionally render its content based on the presence of children. The use ofVStackfor layout and the styling approach appears appropriate for the intended design.web/src/components/site/Navigation/navigation.module.css (2)
144-153: Definition of.rightbaris correctly implementedThe
.rightbarclass has been added and styled consistently with the existing.leftbarclass. This ensures a uniform look and feel for both navigation bars.
203-221: Animations forfadeInRightandfadeOutRightare correctly implementedThe
@keyframesanimations forfadeInRightandfadeOutRightare properly defined, mirroring the existing left bar animations. This will provide smooth transition effects for the right navigation bar.
Southclaws
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/[...catchAll]/page.tsx (2)
3-5: Consider removing theasynckeyword if not needed.The
Pagefunction is correctly defined as the default export, which aligns with Next.js conventions. However, it's currently marked asasyncbut doesn't contain any asynchronous operations. Unless you plan to add async logic in the future, you might want to remove theasynckeyword for clarity.Here's a suggested change:
- export default async function Page() { + export default function Page() { return <RootContextPane />; }
1-5: File structure follows Next.js conventions, but consider adding props and error handling.The overall structure of this file follows Next.js conventions for page components. However, there are a few potential improvements to consider:
Props: The
RootContextPanecomponent is rendered without any props. Consider whether it needs any data or configuration passed to it.Error Handling: As this is a catch-all route, you might want to add error handling for invalid paths.
Loading State: If
RootContextPanefetches data, consider adding a loading state.Here's an example of how you could enhance this component:
import { RootContextPane } from "@/screens/site/RootContextPane"; import { notFound } from 'next/navigation'; export default function Page({ params }: { params: { catchAll: string[] } }) { // Example of using the catch-all params const path = params.catchAll.join('/'); // Example of basic error handling if (path === 'invalid') { notFound(); } return <RootContextPane path={path} />; }This example adds props, uses the catch-all params, and includes basic error handling. Adjust according to your specific requirements.
web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/t/default.tsx (1)
1-5: Clarify the purpose of this component in the application structure.This file introduces a new component in the
@contextpane/t/directory. While the implementation is straightforward, it's not immediately clear how this fits into the larger application structure or what thetdirectory represents.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this component and its placement in this specific directory. This would help other developers understand its role in the application's architecture.
web/src/app/(dashboard)/layout.tsx (2)
9-9: Correct usage of the new propThe
contextpaneprop is correctly passed to theDefaultcomponent, allowing for the new context pane to be rendered.However, consider adding a fallback for when
contextpaneis not provided:-return <Default contextpane={contextpane}>{children}</Default>; +return <Default contextpane={contextpane ?? null}>{children}</Default>;This change ensures that the
Defaultcomponent always receives a valid prop value, even ifcontextpaneis undefined.
Line range hint
1-9: Consider adding JSDoc commentsTo improve code documentation and maintainability, consider adding JSDoc comments to the
Layoutfunction. This will provide better context for other developers working on this code.Here's an example of how you could add JSDoc comments:
/** * Layout component for the dashboard. * @param {Object} props - The component props. * @param {React.ReactNode} props.children - The child components to be rendered. * @param {React.ReactNode} props.contextpane - The context pane to be rendered alongside the children. * @returns {Promise<JSX.Element>} The rendered layout component. */ export default async function Layout({ children, contextpane, }: PropsWithChildren<{ contextpane: React.ReactNode }>) { return <Default contextpane={contextpane}>{children}</Default>; }web/src/components/site/Navigation/NavigationPane/NavigationPane.tsx (2)
Line range hint
8-22: Consider adding props for improved flexibility.The
NavigationPanecomponent currently doesn't accept any props, which might limit its reusability. Consider adding props to allow customization of styles or content, making the component more flexible for different use cases.Here's a suggestion for adding basic props:
-export function NavigationPane() { +interface NavigationPaneProps { + className?: string; + children?: React.ReactNode; +} + +export function NavigationPane({ className, children }: NavigationPaneProps) { return ( <styled.header display="flex" height="full" justifyContent="end" borderRadius="md" - className={Floating()} + className={`${Floating()} ${className || ''}`} > <Box id="desktop-nav-box" w="full" height="full" p="2" pr="0"> - <ContentNavigationList /> + {children || <ContentNavigationList />} </Box> </styled.header> ); }This change allows for custom styling via
classNameand custom content viachildren, while maintaining the default behavior.
Line range hint
8-22: Add comments for better documentation.To improve code maintainability and make it easier for other developers to understand and use this component, consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the component's purpose, props (if added), and any important implementation details.
Here's an example of how you could add comments:
/** * NavigationPane Component * * This component renders a navigation pane typically used for desktop layouts. * It provides a styled container for navigation elements, defaulting to the ContentNavigationList. * * @param {Object} props - The component props * @param {string} [props.className] - Additional CSS classes to apply to the component * @param {React.ReactNode} [props.children] - Custom content to render inside the navigation pane * * @returns {JSX.Element} A styled navigation pane component */ export function NavigationPane({ className, children }: NavigationPaneProps) { // ... (component implementation) }web/src/components/site/Navigation/MobileCommandBar/useMobileCommandBar.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-31: Overall, good improvements to naming and import consistency.The changes in this file improve code readability and maintain consistent import practices. The functionality remains unchanged, which is good. However, please consider the following:
- Ensure that all usages of this hook throughout the project have been updated to reflect the new name.
- Update any relevant documentation or comments that might reference the old name
useNavpill.- If this is part of a larger refactoring effort, consider adding a comment explaining the reason for these changes, which could be helpful for future maintenance.
web/src/components/site/Navigation/ContextPane.tsx (2)
6-6: LGTM: Component structure is well-defined. Consider explicit props typing.The
ContextPanecomponent is well-structured and usesPropsWithChildrenappropriately. To improve type safety and documentation, consider explicitly defining the props interface:interface ContextPaneProps { // Add any additional props here } export function ContextPane({ children }: PropsWithChildren<ContextPaneProps>) { // ... }This approach allows for easier addition of props in the future and improves code readability.
8-22: LGTM: Styling approach is consistent. Consider enhancing responsiveness.The use of styled-system for styling is excellent, providing a maintainable and consistent approach. The semantic HTML elements (nav, aside) enhance accessibility.
Suggestions for improvement:
- The id "desktop-nav-right" suggests this is for desktop layout. Consider using responsive styles to adapt the component for different screen sizes.
- The fixed width ("full") might not be ideal for all scenarios. Consider making this configurable via props.
Example of making width configurable:
interface ContextPaneProps { width?: string; } export function ContextPane({ children, width = "full" }: PropsWithChildren<ContextPaneProps>) { return ( <styled.nav // ...other props width={width} // ... > {/* ... */} </styled.nav> ); }This change would allow the component to be more flexible in different layout contexts.
web/src/layouts/Default.tsx (1)
11-14: LGTM: Function signature update improves clarity.The updated function signature for the
Defaultcomponent is a good improvement. The use of destructuring for props enhances readability, and the type annotation correctly combinesPropsWithChildrenwith the customPropstype.Consider adding a comment explaining why this component is asynchronous, as it's not immediately clear from the current implementation why an async function is necessary.
web/src/components/site/Navigation/Navigation.tsx (1)
19-22: Updated Navigation function signature with new contextpane prop.The function signature has been correctly updated to include the new
contextpaneprop and uses the newly definedPropstype. The use ofPropsWithChildren<Props>ensures type safety for bothcontextpaneandchildren.However, it's worth noting that the function is now asynchronous. Consider adding a comment explaining why this function needs to be async, as it might not be immediately obvious to other developers.
web/styled-system/recipes/index.mjs (1)
55-56: LGTM! Consider organizing exports alphabetically.The reintroduction of the exports for 'qr-code.mjs' and 'popover.mjs' is consistent with the existing pattern in the file. This change suggests that these components are now needed in the project.
For improved maintainability, consider organizing all exports alphabetically. This would make it easier to locate specific exports and maintain consistency as the file grows.
web/src/components/member/MemberBadge/MemberIdent.tsx (1)
24-24: Consider a comprehensive review of overflow handlingThe changes in both MemberIdent and MemberName components consistently replace specific overflow properties (
overflowYandoverflowX) with the more generaloverflowproperty. While this simplifies the code, it might have unintended consequences on the component's layout and appearance.Consider conducting a comprehensive review of overflow handling throughout this component and related components. Ensure that these changes align with the desired behavior for both horizontal and vertical overflow scenarios. It might be beneficial to:
- Document the intended overflow behavior for each sub-component.
- Add comments explaining the reasoning behind using the general
overflowproperty.- Implement consistent overflow handling techniques (e.g., using
textOverflow="ellipsis"where appropriate).- Test the components with various content lengths and types to verify the desired behavior.
Would you like assistance in creating a testing plan or documentation for the overflow behavior in these components?
Also applies to: 45-45
web/src/components/site/Navigation/MobileCommandBar/MobileCommandBar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-95: Summary: Component successfully renamed with minimal impact.The renaming of the Navpill component to MobileCommandBar improves the clarity of its purpose. The changes are consistent throughout the file, with the component function and import statement correctly updated. The internal logic of the component remains unchanged, which is good for maintaining existing functionality.
Consider reviewing the following to ensure a smooth transition:
- Update any documentation or comments referring to this component.
- If this component is part of a larger navigation system, ensure that the naming convention is consistent across related components.
- Verify that the component's new name aligns with the project's overall naming conventions for mobile-specific components.
web/src/components/site/Navigation/navigation.module.css (2)
144-153: LGTM! Consider adding a transition for smoother opacity changes.The implementation of
.rightbaris consistent with.leftbar, which is good for maintainability. The initial state and overflow handling are well-implemented.For consistency with
.leftbar, consider adding a transition property:.rightbar { opacity: 0; display: block; grid-area: rightbar; overflow: hidden; + transition: opacity 0.2s ease-in-out; /* NOTE: This maintains the shadow bleed despite the overflow hidden prop. */ margin: -15px; padding: 15px; }
203-221: LGTM! Consider using CSS variables for animation properties.The addition of
fadeInRightandfadeOutRightanimations complements the rightbar implementation and maintains consistency with the leftbar animations.To improve maintainability, consider using CSS variables for the common animation properties:
+ :root { + --fade-duration: 0.2s; + --fade-timing-function: ease-in-out; + --fade-distance: 10px; + } @keyframes fadeInRight { from { opacity: 0; - transform: translateX(10px); + transform: translateX(var(--fade-distance)); } to { opacity: 1; transform: translateX(0px); } } @keyframes fadeOutRight { from { opacity: 1; transform: translateX(0px); } to { opacity: 0; - transform: translateX(10px); + transform: translateX(var(--fade-distance)); } }Apply similar changes to
fadeInLeftandfadeOutLeft. Then update the animation declarations:- animation: fadeInLeft 0.2s ease-in-out; + animation: fadeInLeft var(--fade-duration) var(--fade-timing-function);This approach makes it easier to maintain consistent animations across the component.
web/src/recipes/table.ts (2)
12-14: Avoid duplicate CSS selectors in 'body' and 'footer' slotsBoth the 'body' and 'footer' slots include the same CSS rule:
"& tr:last-child": { borderBottomWidth: "0", }If this rule applies globally to all table rows, consider moving it to a common parent slot or refactoring to avoid redundancy.
Also applies to: 25-27
32-32: Ensure text alignment adapts for RTL languagesThe 'header' slot sets
textAlign: "left", which may not be suitable for right-to-left (RTL) languages.To improve internationalization support, consider:
- Using
textAlign: "start"instead of"left"to align text based on the writing direction.- Applying logical properties that adapt automatically to RTL contexts.
web/src/screens/thread/ThreadScreen/ThreadScreenContextPane.tsx (1)
39-39: Remove unused variables fromuseThreadScreendestructuringThe variables
form,isEditing,isEmpty,resetKey, andhandlersare destructured fromuseThreadScreenbut are not used within this component. Removing them can simplify the code and improve readability.Apply this diff to remove the unused variables:
- const { ready, error, form, isEditing, isEmpty, resetKey, data, handlers } = + const { ready, error, data } = useThreadScreen(props);web/src/app/layout.tsx (2)
Line range hint
54-54: Address the TODO CommentThere's a TODO comment indicating the need to add another settings field. Please ensure this is addressed to complete the feature.
Would you like assistance in implementing this requirement or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
55-55: Consider Refining the Page Title ConstructionCurrently, the
titleis set as${info.title} | ${info.description}. Depending on the length ofinfo.titleandinfo.description, this could result in a verbose or repetitive page title. Consider refining the title format to enhance readability and SEO effectiveness.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (29)
- web/panda.config.ts (2 hunks)
- web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/[...catchAll]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/default.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/t/[slug]/default.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/t/[slug]/page.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/t/default.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/app/(dashboard)/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/app/default.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/app/layout.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/components/member/MemberBadge/MemberIdent.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/ContextPane.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/DesktopCommandBar.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/MemberActions.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/MobileCommandBar/MobileCommandBar.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/MobileCommandBar/useMobileCommandBar.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/Navigation.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/NavigationPane/NavigationPane.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/Right/Right.tsx (0 hunks)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/navigation.module.css (3 hunks)
- web/src/components/ui/link-button.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/components/ui/table.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/layouts/Default.tsx (2 hunks)
- web/src/recipes/table.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/screens/site/RootContextPane.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/src/screens/thread/ThreadScreen/ThreadScreenContextPane.tsx (1 hunks)
- web/styled-system/recipes/index.d.ts (1 hunks)
- web/styled-system/recipes/index.mjs (1 hunks)
- web/styled-system/recipes/table.d.ts (1 hunks)
- web/styled-system/recipes/table.mjs (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- web/src/components/site/Navigation/Right/Right.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- web/src/app/default.tsx
- web/styled-system/recipes/index.d.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (40)
web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/[...catchAll]/page.tsx (1)
1-1: Import statement looks good.The import of
RootContextPanefollows React naming conventions and uses a relative path, which is appropriate.web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/default.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the
RootContextPanecomponent using a relative path with an alias. This is a good practice for maintaining consistent import paths across the project.
3-5: Consider removing theasynckeyword if not needed.The
Defaultfunction is marked asasync, but it doesn't contain any asynchronous operations. Unless you're planning to add asynchronous logic in the future, consider removing theasynckeyword to keep the component definition straightforward.If you don't plan to use asynchronous operations, you can simplify the function as follows:
-export default async function Default() { +export default function Default() { return <RootContextPane />; }Also, note that this component doesn't accept any props. If
RootContextPanerequires any props, make sure to pass them here.Let's verify if
RootContextPaneexpects any props:web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/t/[slug]/default.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement for
RootContextPanelooks good. It uses a relative import path, which is a common practice in React projects.
3-5:⚠️ Potential issueConsider removing the
asynckeyword if no asynchronous operations are performed.The
Defaultfunction is declared asasync, but it doesn't contain anyawaitexpressions or return a Promise. In React and Next.js, components are typically not asynchronous unless they need to perform data fetching or other asynchronous operations.If there are no plans to add asynchronous operations in this component, consider removing the
asynckeyword:- export default async function Default() { + export default function Default() { return <RootContextPane />; }If asynchronous operations are planned for the future, it might be helpful to add a comment explaining the intended use of the
asynckeyword.To check if there are any other async components in the project that might justify this pattern, you can run the following command:
This will help determine if this is a common pattern in the project or an isolated case.
✅ Verification successful
Remove the
asynckeyword from theDefaultfunction.The
Defaultfunction inweb/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/t/[slug]/default.tsxdoes not contain anyawaitexpressions or asynchronous operations. Removing theasynckeyword will simplify the code.
- File:
web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/t/[slug]/default.tsx- Lines: 3-5
- export default async function Default() { + export default function Default() { return <RootContextPane />; }🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for async React components in the project rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'export\s+default\s+async\s+function' ./srcLength of output: 124
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Search for async React components in the project by targeting .ts and .tsx files rg 'export\s+default\s+async\s+function' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' ./srcLength of output: 123
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Search for async React components in the project by targeting .ts and .tsx files across the entire repository rg 'export\s+default\s+async\s+function' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 2317
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Check for 'await' usage within the Default function in default.tsx rg 'await\s+' ./web/src/app/\(dashboard\)/@contextpane/t/\[slug\]/default.tsxLength of output: 77
web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/t/default.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The import statement correctly imports the
RootContextPanecomponent using a relative path with an alias. This is a good practice for maintaining consistent import paths across the project.
3-5: Consider removing theasynckeyword from the function.The
Defaultfunction is declared as asynchronous, but it doesn't contain any asynchronous operations. Unless there's a specific reason for this (e.g., future plans to add async logic), consider removing theasynckeyword to keep the code simpler and more accurate.Here's a suggested change:
- export default async function Default() { + export default function Default() { return <RootContextPane />; }Additionally, it's worth noting that this component doesn't accept any props and passes none to
RootContextPane. IfRootContextPaneexpects any props, make sure to pass them here.To verify the props of
RootContextPane, you can run:web/src/app/(dashboard)/@contextpane/t/[slug]/page.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and follow best practices.The imports for the API function and the component are correctly structured and named according to best practices.
4-6: LGTM: Function signature follows Next.js conventions.The
Pagefunction is correctly defined as an async function and follows the Next.js convention for dynamic routes by accepting theslugparameter from theprops.paramsobject.web/src/components/site/Navigation/NavigationPane/NavigationPane.tsx (1)
8-8: Approve function renaming and verify its impact.The renaming from
LefttoNavigationPaneimproves clarity and better describes the component's purpose. However, ensure that all imports and usages of this component throughout the codebase have been updated accordingly.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
web/src/components/site/Navigation/MobileCommandBar/useMobileCommandBar.ts (1)
8-8: Function name updated to better reflect its purpose.The change from
useNavpilltouseMobileCommandBaris a good improvement. The new name is more descriptive and better aligns with the component's functionality.To ensure all usages of this hook have been updated, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining usages of 'useNavpill' # Expected: No results, indicating all usages have been updated rg --type typescript --type javascript 'useNavpill'If any occurrences are found, please update them to use the new
useMobileCommandBarname.web/src/components/site/Navigation/ContextPane.tsx (1)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and well-organized.The imports are concise and relevant to the component's requirements. The use of path aliases (e.g., '@/') is a good practice for maintaining clean and manageable imports.
web/src/layouts/Default.tsx (2)
1-9: LGTM: New import and type definition are appropriate.The addition of the
ReactNodeimport and the newPropstype definition are well-structured and necessary for the component's updated functionality. Thecontextpaneproperty is correctly typed asReactNode, allowing for flexible content in the context pane.
23-30: LGTM: JSX updates are consistent with new prop structure.The changes in the component's JSX are well-implemented:
- The
Navigationcomponent now correctly receives thecontextpaneprop.- The
childrenprop is directly used, which is cleaner and consistent with the updated function signature.To ensure the
Navigationcomponent is correctly implementing the newcontextpaneprop, please run the following verification script:web/src/screens/site/RootContextPane.tsx (1)
1-7: Imports look good and are well-organized.The imports cover all necessary components and utilities for the
RootContextPanecomponent. The use of Next.js'sImagecomponent and custom UI components from your project structure is appropriate.web/src/components/site/Navigation/MemberActions.tsx (3)
Line range hint
20-38: LGTM! Component structure and functionality preserved.The internal logic and structure of the
MemberActionscomponent have been maintained, which is excellent. The component continues to use theuseSessionhook correctly and renders the appropriate UI based on the session state.The refactoring improves the component's naming without introducing any logical errors or inconsistencies. Good job on maintaining the component's functionality while improving its organization!
20-20: Approve name change. Verify usage across codebase.The renaming of the component from
ToolbartoMemberActionsis a good improvement. The new name is more descriptive and better reflects the component's purpose.Since this change affects the public interface of the component, it's crucial to update all instances where it's used. Run the following script to identify places where the old name might still be in use:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find occurrences of the old component name 'Toolbar' # Test: Search for 'Toolbar' in TypeScript and TSX files rg --type typescript --type tsx -w 'Toolbar'Please review the results and update any remaining occurrences of
ToolbartoMemberActions.
13-14: LGTM! Consider verifying import consistency.The change to relative imports for
AccountMenuandComposeAnchoris a good practice. It makes the component's dependencies more explicit and can improve maintainability.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any remaining instances where these components are imported using the old pattern.
web/src/components/ui/link-button.tsx (1)
26-28: Improved internal link detection logicThe updated condition for
isExternalnow correctly identifies both "/" and "#" as indicators of internal links. This enhancement improves the component's versatility by properly handling in-page navigation links (starting with "#") as internal links.The change is well-implemented and aligns with common web practices. It will ensure that the external link icon is not displayed for in-page navigation, providing a better user experience.
web/src/components/site/Navigation/Navigation.tsx (4)
9-12: Improved modularization of navigation components.The new imports for
ContextPane,DesktopCommandBar,MobileCommandBar, andNavigationPaneindicate a positive restructuring of the navigation components. This modularization can lead to better maintainability and separation of concerns.
15-17: Well-defined Props type for Navigation component.The new
Propstype is correctly defined with acontextpaneproperty of typeReact.ReactNode. This provides type safety and allows for flexible content to be passed as the context pane.
51-62: Updated rendering logic with new navigation components.The rendering logic has been successfully updated to use the new components:
DesktopCommandBarreplaces the previousTopcomponentNavigationPanereplacesLeftin the leftbarContextPaneis now used in the rightbar, implementing the new contextual featureMobileCommandBarreplacesNavpillThese changes align well with the new imports and the overall restructuring of the navigation components.
To ensure the layout integrity has been maintained, please verify that the new components render correctly and maintain the expected layout structure. You may want to test this across different screen sizes to confirm responsiveness.
58-58: Clarification needed on createPortal usage.The PR objectives mention uncertainty about the use of
createPortal. However, its implementation is not visible in this file. It's likely thatcreatePortalis used within theContextPanecomponent.Could you provide more information about how
createPortalis being used in theContextPanecomponent? This would help in assessing whether its use is appropriate in this context.web/styled-system/recipes/table.mjs (1)
103-105: Verify table component behavior with expandedtableSlotFnsThe expansion of
tableSlotNamesleads to a largertableSlotFnsarray with duplicate functions for each table part. While the core functionality of the table component remains unchanged, this might have unintended consequences.Please verify that:
- The table component still renders correctly with no duplicate elements.
- There's no performance degradation due to the increased size of
tableSlotFns.- Consuming components handle potential duplicate slot functions correctly.
To assist with verification, you can run the following script to check for any unexpected behavior in components using the table recipe:
If any issues are found, consider reverting the changes to
tableSlotNamesor updating the consuming components to handle potential duplicates.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No Issues Found with
tableSlotFnsThe
tableSlotFnsarray is not utilized in any components beyond the configuration file. Therefore, there are no duplicate functions or performance concerns related to the current changes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components using the table recipe echo "Components using the table recipe:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'import.*table.*from.*recipes/table' -l # Check for any direct usage of tableSlotNames or tableSlotFns echo "\nDirect usage of tableSlotNames or tableSlotFns:" rg --type typescript --type typescriptreact 'tableSlotNames|tableSlotFns'Length of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components using the table recipe with corrected file types echo "Components using the table recipe:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'import.*table.*from.*recipes/table' -l # Check for any direct usage of tableSlotNames or tableSlotFns with corrected file types echo "\nDirect usage of tableSlotNames or tableSlotFns:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'tableSlotNames|tableSlotFns'Length of output: 365
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components using the table recipe in .ts and .tsx files echo "Components using the table recipe:" rg 'import.*table.*from.*recipes/table' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -l # Check for any direct usage of tableSlotNames or tableSlotFns in .ts and .tsx files echo "\nDirect usage of tableSlotNames or tableSlotFns:" rg 'tableSlotNames|tableSlotFns' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 345
web/src/components/member/MemberBadge/MemberIdent.tsx (2)
45-45: Verify the impact of changing overflow property in MemberNameThe change from
overflowXtooverflowis consistent with the previous change in MemberIdent. However, this might affect the vertical overflow behavior. Please verify that this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, especially for content that might overflow vertically (e.g., multiple lines of text).To check for potential issues, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for instances where vertical overflow might be an issue in MemberName # Test: Look for multi-line text content or tall elements within MemberName rg --type typescript -g '**/*.tsx' -A 5 'MemberName.*?>\s*.*?{.*?\\n.*?}|MemberName.*?>\s*.*?style.*?height'If the vertical overflow is intentional, consider adding a comment explaining the reasoning behind this change. If not, you might want to use
overflow="hidden"along withmaxHeightandtextOverflow="ellipsis"to handle long content gracefully.
24-24: Verify the impact of changing overflow propertyThe change from
overflowYtooverflowsimplifies the overflow handling but might affect the horizontal overflow behavior. Please verify that this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, especially for long content that might overflow horizontally.To check for potential issues, you can run the following script:
If the horizontal overflow is intentional, consider adding a comment explaining the reasoning behind this change. If not, you might want to use
overflow="hidden"along withtextOverflow="ellipsis"to handle long content gracefully.web/src/components/site/Navigation/MobileCommandBar/MobileCommandBar.tsx (2)
24-24: LGTM! Verify hook file renaming.The import statement has been correctly updated to reflect the new component name. This change is consistent with the component renaming from Navpill to MobileCommandBar.
Let's verify if the hook file has been renamed accordingly:
✅ Verification successful
All references successfully updated.
No remaining references to the old
Navpillcomponent were found in the codebase. The renaming toMobileCommandBarhas been thoroughly applied.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old 'Navpill' component # Test 1: Search for 'Navpill' in all TypeScript and TypeScript React files rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript 'Navpill' # Test 2: Search for 'useNavpill' in all TypeScript and TypeScript React files rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript 'useNavpill'Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old 'Navpill' component # Test 1: Search for 'Navpill' in all TypeScript and TypeScript React files rg --type-add 'typescript=*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript 'Navpill' # Test 2: Search for 'useNavpill' in all TypeScript and TypeScript React files rg --type-add 'typescript=*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript 'useNavpill'Length of output: 246
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old 'Navpill' component # Test 1: Search for 'Navpill' in all TypeScript and TypeScript React files rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript 'Navpill' # Test 2: Search for 'useNavpill' in all TypeScript and TypeScript React files rg --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -t typescript 'useNavpill'Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old 'Navpill' component # Search for 'Navpill' or 'useNavpill' in all TypeScript and TypeScript React files rg 'Navpill|useNavpill' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 54
web/src/components/site/Navigation/navigation.module.css (3)
Line range hint
182-202: LGTM! Enhanced animations for improved visual feedback.The renaming of
fadeInandfadeOuttofadeInLeftandfadeOutLeft, along with the addition of horizontal translation, provides a more engaging and intuitive animation for the leftbar.These changes align well with the earlier modifications to the leftbar behavior and contribute to a more polished user interface.
170-181:⚠️ Potential issueFix attribute selectors for rightbar visibility control.
The current implementation uses
data-leftbar-shownto control the rightbar visibility, which is incorrect and may lead to unexpected behavior.Please update the attribute selectors as follows:
-.navigation__container[data-leftbar-shown="false"] .rightbar { +.navigation__container[data-rightbar-shown="false"] .rightbar { opacity: 0; pointer-events: none; } -.navigation__container[data-leftbar-shown="true"] .rightbar { +.navigation__container[data-rightbar-shown="true"] .rightbar { opacity: 1; pointer-events: all; animation: fadeInRight 0.2s ease-in-out; }This change ensures that the rightbar visibility is controlled independently of the leftbar.
160-167: Improved animations for better visual feedback.The update to use directional fade animations (
fadeOutLeftandfadeInLeft) enhances the user experience by providing clearer visual cues.Regarding the commented-out animation:
/* NOTE: Doesn't work properly on initial page load, causes the sidebar to flicker visible and play the animation, need a way to not do this soon. */ /* animation: fadeOutLeft 0.2s ease-in-out; */This issue needs to be addressed. Consider using a CSS class to control the initial state:
Based on the results, we can suggest a solution to prevent the initial animation.
web/panda.config.ts (2)
16-16: LGTM: New table recipe import added correctly.The import statement for the
tablerecipe is correctly added and follows the existing pattern for importing custom recipes. This addition prepares the configuration to use the table styling recipe.
243-243: LGTM: Table recipe added to slotRecipes.The
tablerecipe is correctly added to theslotRecipesobject, making it available for use in the styling system. This addition is consistent with how other slot recipes are included.To ensure the
tablerecipe is properly implemented, please run the following script:✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Table recipe successfully added to slotRecipes.
The
tablerecipe fileweb/src/recipes/table.tsexists and correctly exports thetablerecipe. The addition to theslotRecipesobject is properly implemented, making thetablerecipe available in the styling system.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the table recipe # Test: Check if the table recipe file exists and contains necessary exports if [ -f "src/recipes/table.ts" ] || [ -f "src/recipes/table.js" ]; then echo "Table recipe file found." rg --type typescript --type javascript "export const table" src/recipes/table.* else echo "Error: Table recipe file not found in the expected location." fi # Test: Look for usage of the table recipe in the project rg --type typescript --type javascript "table[.(]" src/Length of output: 291
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the table recipe without relying on predefined file types # Test: Check if the table recipe file exists in src/recipes with .ts or .js extension if [ -f "src/recipes/table.ts" ]; then echo "Table recipe file found: src/recipes/table.ts" grep -H "export const table" src/recipes/table.ts elif [ -f "src/recipes/table.js" ]; then echo "Table recipe file found: src/recipes/table.js" grep -H "export const table" src/recipes/table.js else echo "Error: Table recipe file not found in the expected location." fi # Test: Look for usage of the table recipe in the project grep -rn "table(" src/Length of output: 261
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the table recipe file and verify its exports and usage # Find the table recipe file anywhere in the repository file=$(fd -e ts -e js "^table\.(ts|js)$") if [ -z "$file" ]; then echo "Error: Table recipe file not found in the repository." else echo "Table recipe file found: $file" grep -H "export const table" "$file" || echo "Warning: 'export const table' not found in $file" # Look for usage of the table recipe in the project grep -rn "table(" . fiLength of output: 1268
web/src/components/site/Navigation/DesktopCommandBar.tsx (3)
7-13: Imports updated to reflect new component structureThe import statements have been updated to match the new file structure and component locations. These changes appear correct and ensure that the appropriate components are being imported.
39-39: ConfirmMemberActionsreplacesToolbarfunctionalityThe
Toolbarcomponent has been replaced withMemberActionsin the command bar. Please ensure that all functionalities previously provided byToolbarare now appropriately handled byMemberActionsto avoid any loss of functionality.Run the following script to check for any remaining references to
Toolbar:#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the codebase for references to `Toolbar`. # Test: Find any occurrences of `Toolbar`. Expect: No matches. rg --type js --type ts --type jsx --type tsx -F 'Toolbar'
15-15: Ensure all references toTopare updated toDesktopCommandBarThe exported function has been renamed from
ToptoDesktopCommandBar. Please verify that all references toTopwithin the codebase have been updated to prevent any undefined function errors.Run the following script to search for any remaining references to
Top:✅ Verification successful
References to
Topare fully updatedAll references to the
Topfunction have been successfully updated toDesktopCommandBar, and no remaining references were found in.jsand.tsfiles.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the codebase for references to the `Top` function. # Test: Find any occurrences of `Top(`. Expect: No matches. rg --type js --type ts --type jsx --type tsx -F 'Top('Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the codebase for references to the `Top` function. # Test: Find any occurrences of `Top(`. Expect: No matches. rg --type js --type ts --type tsx -F 'Top('Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search the codebase for references to the `Top` function. # Test: Find any occurrences of `Top(`. Expect: No matches. rg --type js --type ts -F 'Top('Length of output: 34
web/src/components/ui/table.tsx (1)
12-53: Enhanced type safety and component definitionsThe updates to the component typings improve type safety and clarity. By specifying the exact HTML element types and combining
HTMLStyledPropswithPolymorphicProps, the components now have more precise and flexible prop definitions. This enhancement will help catch type errors during development and improve the overall developer experience.web/src/recipes/table.ts (2)
36-40: Validate transition properties for smoother animationsThe 'row' slot includes transition properties:
transitionDuration: "normal", transitionProperty: "background, color", transitionTimingFunction: "default",Ensure that the elements intended to transition (e.g., background color on hover) are correctly set up and that these properties result in smooth animations across different browsers.
1-102: Well-structured implementation of the table componentThe new
tablerecipe is thoughtfully designed with clear slot definitions, base styles, and variants for size and style. The use ofdefineSlotRecipeenhances modularity and reusability.web/src/app/layout.tsx (1)
16-16: Use ofasyncinRootLayoutFunctionMaking
RootLayoutan asynchronous function is acceptable, as it prepares the component for potential asynchronous operations in the future. This aligns with Next.js practices for server components that may need to fetch data.
| export default async function Layout({ | ||
| children, | ||
| contextpane, | ||
| }: PropsWithChildren<{ contextpane: React.ReactNode }>) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Function signature updated correctly
The Layout function signature has been updated to include the new contextpane prop. The use of PropsWithChildren generic type with the additional prop type is correct and follows TypeScript best practices.
However, there's a minor issue:
The React import is missing, which is needed for the React.ReactNode type. Add the following import at the top of the file:
+import React from "react";
import { PropsWithChildren } from "react";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export default async function Layout({ | |
| children, | |
| contextpane, | |
| }: PropsWithChildren<{ contextpane: React.ReactNode }>) { | |
| import React from "react"; | |
| import { PropsWithChildren } from "react"; | |
| export default async function Layout({ | |
| children, | |
| contextpane, | |
| }: PropsWithChildren<{ contextpane: React.ReactNode }>) { |
| try { | ||
| const { data } = await threadGet(slug); | ||
|
|
||
| return <ThreadScreenContextPane slug={slug} thread={data} />; | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| console.error(e); | ||
| return null; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider improving error handling and user experience.
While the current implementation catches errors, it might not provide the best user experience:
- Logging to console is good for debugging but not visible to users.
- Returning
nullin case of an error might lead to an empty or broken UI.
Consider the following improvements:
- Implement a proper error boundary or error component to display user-friendly error messages.
- Use Next.js error handling mechanisms like
error.jsfor more robust error management. - Consider adding retry logic for transient network errors.
Here's a suggested improvement:
import { ErrorComponent } from '@/components/ErrorComponent';
export default async function Page(props: { params: { slug: string } }) {
const { slug } = props.params;
try {
const { data } = await threadGet(slug);
return <ThreadScreenContextPane slug={slug} thread={data} />;
} catch (e) {
console.error(e);
return <ErrorComponent message="Failed to load thread data. Please try again later." />;
}
}This approach provides a better user experience by rendering an error component instead of returning null.
| const { data } = await threadGet(slug); | ||
|
|
||
| return <ThreadScreenContextPane slug={slug} thread={data} />; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding type checking for the API response.
While the component rendering looks correct, it's advisable to add type checking for the data returned from the API call. This can help catch potential issues early and improve code reliability.
Consider updating the code as follows:
import { threadGet, ThreadGetResponse } from "@/api/openapi-server/threads";
// ... (rest of the imports)
export default async function Page(props: { params: { slug: string } }) {
const { slug } = props.params;
try {
const { data }: ThreadGetResponse = await threadGet(slug);
return <ThreadScreenContextPane slug={slug} thread={data} />;
} catch (e) {
// ... (error handling)
}
}This change assumes that the threadGet function returns a type ThreadGetResponse. If this type doesn't exist, consider creating it to match the structure of the API response.
| @@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ | |||
| import { usePathname } from "next/navigation"; | |||
| import { useEffect, useState } from "react"; | |||
|
|
|||
| import { useSession } from "src/auth"; | |||
| import { useSession } from "@/auth"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent import paths for useSession detected
Several files still import useSession from "src/auth" instead of the updated alias "@/auth". Please update these import statements to ensure consistency across the project:
web/src/screens/library/LibraryPageScreen/useLibraryPageScreen.tsweb/src/components/site/Onboarding/useOnboarding.tsweb/src/components/site/Navigation/useNavigation.tsweb/src/components/site/Onboarding/Checklist/useChecklist.tsweb/src/screens/profile/useProfileScreen.tsweb/src/screens/drafts/useDraftListScreen.tsweb/src/components/thread/ReplyMenu/useReplyMenu.tsweb/src/components/library/LibraryPageMenu/useLibraryPageMenu.tsweb/src/components/category/CategoryList/useCategoryList.ts
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM: Import path updated to use alias.
The change from src/auth to @/auth for importing useSession is a good practice. It uses an alias path, which can make imports more consistent and easier to maintain across the project.
To ensure consistency, let's check if this change has been applied project-wide:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining 'src/auth' imports
# Expected: No results, indicating all imports have been updated
rg --type typescript --type javascript 'from ["\']src/auth["\']'
Length of output: 180
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining 'src/auth' imports using balanced quotes
# Expected: No results, indicating all imports have been updated
rg --type typescript --type javascript "from [\"']src/auth[\"']"
Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining 'src/auth' imports using file extensions and corrected quotes
# Expected: No results, indicating all imports have been updated
rg 'from ["'\'']src/auth["'\'']' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.js'
Length of output: 910
| export async function RootContextPane() { | ||
| const info = await getInfo(); | ||
| const iconURL = getIconURL("512x512"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider refactoring the async component structure.
The current implementation as an async function might lead to issues with React's rendering lifecycle. Consider these improvements:
- Use React's data fetching patterns (e.g.,
useEffectwithuseStatefor client-side fetching, orgetServerSideProps/getStaticPropsfor server-side data fetching). - Implement loading and error states to handle asynchronous operations more gracefully.
- Move data fetching logic outside the component to improve separation of concerns.
Example refactor:
import { useEffect, useState } from 'react';
export function RootContextPane() {
const [info, setInfo] = useState(null);
const [iconURL, setIconURL] = useState('');
const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(true);
const [error, setError] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
async function fetchData() {
try {
const fetchedInfo = await getInfo();
const fetchedIconURL = getIconURL("512x512");
setInfo(fetchedInfo);
setIconURL(fetchedIconURL);
} catch (err) {
setError(err);
} finally {
setIsLoading(false);
}
}
fetchData();
}, []);
if (isLoading) return <div>Loading...</div>;
if (error) return <div>Error: {error.message}</div>;
if (!info) return null;
// Render component...
}This structure separates data fetching from rendering and handles different states of the asynchronous operation.
web/src/recipes/table.ts
Outdated
| variant: { | ||
| outline: { | ||
| root: { | ||
| borderWidth: "1px", | ||
| }, | ||
| head: { | ||
| bg: "bg.subtle", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| plain: { | ||
| row: { | ||
| _hover: { | ||
| bg: "bg.subtle", | ||
| }, | ||
| _selected: { | ||
| bg: "bg.muted", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review variant styling for completeness and consistency
In the 'variants' section:
- The 'outline' variant styles the 'root' and 'head' slots.
- The 'plain' variant styles the 'row' slot.
Consider:
- Checking if other slots (e.g., 'cell', 'footer') require variant-specific styles.
- Ensuring that variants provide a consistent look and feel across all table elements.
web/src/recipes/table.ts
Outdated
| size: { | ||
| sm: { | ||
| root: { | ||
| textStyle: "xs", | ||
| }, | ||
| caption: { | ||
| mt: "1", | ||
| }, | ||
| cell: { | ||
| height: "8", | ||
| px: "2", | ||
| }, | ||
| header: { | ||
| height: "11", | ||
| px: "3", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| md: { | ||
| root: { | ||
| textStyle: "sm", | ||
| }, | ||
| caption: { | ||
| mt: "4", | ||
| }, | ||
| cell: { | ||
| height: "14", | ||
| px: "4", | ||
| }, | ||
| header: { | ||
| height: "11", | ||
| px: "4", | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure size variants cover all relevant slots
The 'size' variants ('sm' and 'md') adjust styles for 'root', 'caption', 'cell', and 'header' slots.
Consider:
- Reviewing if other slots like 'footer' and 'row' need size-specific adjustments.
- Verifying that the size variations result in a harmonious and proportional table layout.
web/src/recipes/table.ts
Outdated
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
| caption: { | ||
| color: "fg.subtle", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Color tokens are not defined in the theme.
- The specified color tokens (
"fg.subtle","fg.muted","bg.subtle","bg.muted") are used across multiple components but lack corresponding definitions in the theme or configuration files. - Please define these tokens in your theme to ensure consistent styling and prevent potential issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Confirm that color tokens are defined in the theme
The following color tokens are used:
"fg.subtle""fg.muted""bg.subtle""bg.muted"
Ensure these tokens are defined in your theme to prevent styling issues.
You can run the following script to verify the color tokens:
Also applies to: 30-30, 53-53, 59-59, 62-62
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if color tokens are defined in the theme files.
# Expected: All tokens should be found in theme definitions.
rg --type ts '"fg\.subtle"|"fg\.muted"|"bg\.subtle"|"bg\.muted"' src/theme
Length of output: 126
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Locate theme files within the repository.
# Search for files that likely contain theme definitions
fd --type f --extension ts --regex 'theme|styles|config' .
Length of output: 147
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if color tokens are defined in the located configuration files.
rg --type ts '"fg\.subtle"|"fg\.muted"|"bg\.subtle"|"bg\.muted"' home/panda.config.ts web/orval.config.ts web/panda.config.ts web/src/config.ts
Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Perform a global search for the specified color tokens across the entire repository.
rg '"fg\.subtle"|"fg\.muted"|"bg\.subtle"|"bg\.muted"' .
Length of output: 50078
| @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ | |||
| "use client"; | |||
|
|
|||
| import { formatDate } from "date-fns"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the import and usage of the date formatting function
The date-fns library exports the format function, not formatDate. Please update the import statement and the function usage accordingly.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
- import { formatDate } from "date-fns";
+ import { format } from "date-fns";And update the usage:
- value: formatDate(thread.createdAt, "MMM d, yyyy"),
+ value: format(thread.createdAt, "MMM d, yyyy"),Also applies to: 69-69
| <styled.a | ||
| color="fg.muted" | ||
| className={button({ | ||
| variant: "subtle", | ||
| size: "xs", | ||
| })} | ||
| href="#" | ||
| > | ||
| scroll to top | ||
| </styled.a> | ||
| </styled.p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance the "scroll to top" functionality
Using href="#" may cause unintended behavior, such as adding an entry to the browser's history or causing a page refresh. Consider using an onClick handler to programmatically scroll to the top without affecting the URL.
Apply this diff to improve the functionality:
- <styled.a
+ <styled.button
color="fg.muted"
className={button({
variant: "subtle",
size: "xs",
})}
- href="#"
+ onClick={() => window.scrollTo({ top: 0, behavior: 'smooth' })}
>
scroll to top
- </styled.a>
+ </styled.button>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <styled.a | |
| color="fg.muted" | |
| className={button({ | |
| variant: "subtle", | |
| size: "xs", | |
| })} | |
| href="#" | |
| > | |
| scroll to top | |
| </styled.a> | |
| </styled.p> | |
| <styled.button | |
| color="fg.muted" | |
| className={button({ | |
| variant: "subtle", | |
| size: "xs", | |
| })} | |
| onClick={() => window.scrollTo({ top: 0, behavior: 'smooth' })} | |
| > | |
| scroll to top | |
| </styled.button> | |
| </styled.p> |
Experimental, not sure if this is a good use of createPortal...