-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implenting addArc feature #144
Conversation
Currently the transformation feature is still not completed, I think there are two ways to implement this:
|
@derBobo feel free to go with 2., we can always optimize later, the main goal is to close the feature gap. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Should I also change the EllipsePlygon class to use the EllipticalArcLineSegment instead of CubicBezierLineSegment? |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #144 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.88% 70.02% +0.13%
==========================================
Files 88 89 +1
Lines 5144 5207 +63
Branches 1052 1062 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 3595 3646 +51
- Misses 1338 1347 +9
- Partials 211 214 +3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
from memory its really an internal implemetation detail on what sort of line segment we are using so I would say unless it makes a noticable/more acurate/faster difference to the output then I personally wouldn't bother. But saying all that as long as we have sufficent test coverage then I can't imagine it would cause too much harm. |
Thanks @tocsoft makes sense! |
does anyone have more ideas fore Xunit tests ? |
We need tests that actually draw the Example tests doing some drawing of These tests are validating the output agains reference images found here: The images are Debug-Saved under the folder |
I think this feature now is ready for review. |
@SixLabors/core would someone have a chance to review this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm 👍
@derBobo thanks for this, and your patience in getting this in.
You're welcome.
|
Prerequisites
Description
This should implement the requested features from #4