-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add the ability to store API key in a secure maner #158
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes introduce an enumeration for key storage methods in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AccountDialog
participant Account
participant KeyringService
User->>AccountDialog: Open account dialog
AccountDialog->>Account: Load account data
Account->>AccountDialog: Return current API key storage method
AccountDialog->>User: Display storage method options
User->>AccountDialog: Select storage method
AccountDialog->>Account: Save selected method
AccountDialog->>KeyringService: Store API key if system method selected
KeyringService-->>Account: API key securely stored
Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files selected for processing (2)
Additional comments not posted (6)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add Documentation and Community
|
@coderabbitai full review |
…ey from system keyring
93c5e5a
to
aa04abc
Compare
…r username in system keyring
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
basilisk/account.py
Outdated
def __init__(self, **data): | ||
try: | ||
super().__init__(**data) | ||
except ValidationError as e: | ||
log.error( | ||
f"Error in account {e} the account will not be accessible" | ||
) | ||
except Exception as e: | ||
log.error(f"Error creating account: {e}", exc_info=True) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Lack of Documentation for Error Handling in the Account Constructor
The __init__
method in basilisk/account.py
lacks comments or documentation explaining the broad exception handling strategy. This absence could lead to masking other unexpected issues. Consider adding documentation to clarify the rationale behind this approach.
basilisk/account.py
: Lines 108-112
Analysis chain
Enhanced error handling in the Account constructor.
The constructor now catches all exceptions, logs them, and rethrows. This is good for debugging but ensure that this broad exception handling does not mask other unexpected issues.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if detailed error handling is documented.
# Test: Search for comments regarding error handling in the Account constructor.
rg --type python -A 5 $'def __init__'
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if detailed error handling is documented.
# Test: Search for comments regarding error handling in the Account constructor.
rg --type py -A 5 $'def __init__'
Length of output: 9376
Refactor validation method for api_key Restore custom __init__ method for account
c1d97c6
to
8a377ad
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
@coderabbitai summary |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
if not self.organization: | ||
self.key_storage_method.SetSelection(0) | ||
return |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider handling the default selection more robustly.
When no organization is present, the default selection is set to 0. Consider adding a default or placeholder entry in the key_storage_methods
to ensure clarity for the user.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores