Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Fix for 12 vulnerabilities #99

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

laxmanraparthi
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • superset-frontend/package.json
    • superset-frontend/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-ANSIREGEX-1583908
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 586/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-GLOBPARENT-1016905
No Proof of Concept
medium severity 703/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.2
Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
SNYK-JS-INFLIGHT-6095116
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Improper Input Validation
SNYK-JS-POSTCSS-5926692
Yes No Known Exploit
high severity 696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-SEMVER-3247795
No Proof of Concept
critical severity 816/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.9
Sandbox Escape
SNYK-JS-VM2-5415299
No Proof of Concept
critical severity 811/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.8
Sandbox Escape
SNYK-JS-VM2-5422057
No Proof of Concept
critical severity 704/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 9.8
Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions
SNYK-JS-VM2-5426093
No No Known Exploit
medium severity 586/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')
SNYK-JS-VM2-5537079
No Proof of Concept
critical severity 811/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.8
Sandbox Bypass
SNYK-JS-VM2-5537100
No Proof of Concept
critical severity 811/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.8
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
SNYK-JS-VM2-5772823
No Proof of Concept
critical severity 811/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.8
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
SNYK-JS-VM2-5772825
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: @storybook/addon-essentials The new version differs by 250 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: @storybook/builder-webpack5 The new version differs by 250 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: @storybook/react The new version differs by 250 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: lerna The new version differs by 48 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Improper Input Validation
🦉 Remote Code Execution (RCE)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants