.pr_agent_accepted_suggestions

PR 14898 (2024-12-13)

[Possible issue] Properly handle file lock acquisition errors instead of silently ignoring them

✅ Properly handle file lock acquisition errors instead of silently ignoring them

Handle error cases in Lock::acquire() instead of using unwrap_or_default() which silently ignores lock failures. File locking is critical for preventing race conditions.

rust/src/files.rs [93]

-file.lock_exclusive().unwrap_or_default();
+file.lock_exclusive().map_err(|e| anyhow!("Failed to acquire file lock: {}", e))?;

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

Why: Critical security improvement that prevents silent failures in file locking mechanism. Proper error handling is essential for maintaining data integrity and preventing race conditions.

PR 14874 (2024-12-08)

[General] Maintain consistent null parameter validation by throwing exceptions instead of silently handling null values

✅ Maintain consistent null parameter validation by throwing exceptions instead of silently handling null values

The DeleteCookieNamed method should throw an ArgumentNullException when name is null, similar to how AddCookie handles null parameters. This maintains consistency in null parameter handling across the class.

dotnet/src/webdriver/CookieJar.cs [99-107]

 public void DeleteCookieNamed(string? name)
 {
-    if (name is not null)
+    if (name is null)
     {
-        Dictionary<string, object> parameters = new Dictionary<string, object>();
-        parameters.Add("name", name);
-        this.driver.InternalExecute(DriverCommand.DeleteCookie, parameters);
+        throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(name));
     }
+    Dictionary<string, object> parameters = new Dictionary<string, object>();
+    parameters.Add("name", name);
+    this.driver.InternalExecute(DriverCommand.DeleteCookie, parameters);
 }

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The suggestion improves code consistency and robustness by enforcing strict null parameter validation, aligning with the pattern used in other methods like AddCookie. This prevents potential issues from silent null handling.

PR 14819 (2024-11-27)

[General] Simplify null check using null-coalescing operator for better readability and maintainability

✅ Simplify null check using null-coalescing operator for better readability and maintainability

The null-coalescing operator (??) should be used instead of the pattern matching expression to check for null StreamWriter, as it's more idiomatic in C# and clearer in intent.

dotnet/src/webdriver/Internal/Logging/FileLogHandler.cs [83-91]

-if (_streamWriter is not { } writer)
-{
-    throw new ObjectDisposedException(nameof(FileLogHandler));
-}
+var writer = _streamWriter ?? throw new ObjectDisposedException(nameof(FileLogHandler));
 
 lock (_lockObj)
 {
     writer.WriteLine($"{logEvent.Timestamp:yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff} {_levels[(int)logEvent.Level]} {logEvent.IssuedBy.Name}: {logEvent.Message}");
 }

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

Why: The suggestion improves code readability by using a more concise and idiomatic C# pattern. While valid, the impact is moderate as it's primarily a stylistic change.

PR 14759 (2024-11-15)

[Best practice] Fix inconsistent code indentation to improve readability

✅ Fix inconsistent code indentation to improve readability

The indentation of the logger check block is inconsistent. Align the opening brace with the if statement.

dotnet/src/webdriver/Remote/RemoteWebDriver.cs [432-435]

 if (_logger.IsEnabled(LogEventLevel.Warn))
-             {
-            _logger.Warn("CDP support for Firefox is deprecated and will be removed in future versions. Please switch to WebDriver BiDi.");
-            }
+{
+    _logger.Warn("CDP support for Firefox is deprecated and will be removed in future versions. Please switch to WebDriver BiDi.");
+}

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies an indentation inconsistency in the code that affects readability, though it's a relatively minor issue that doesn't affect functionality.

PR 14742 (2024-11-11)

[Possible bug] Add parameter validation to prevent null reference exceptions

✅ Add parameter validation to prevent null reference exceptions

Add null check for key parameter in SetPreferenceValue method to prevent potential issues with null keys.

dotnet/src/webdriver/Firefox/Preferences.cs [166-168]

 private void SetPreferenceValue(string key, JsonNode? value)
 {
+    if (key == null)
+        throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(key));
     if (!this.IsSettablePreference(key))

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: Adding null validation for method parameters is a crucial defensive programming practice that prevents potential null reference exceptions and improves code reliability.

PR 14737 (2024-11-10)

[Best practice] Replace debug assertion with exception throw to properly handle unexpected states in production code

✅ Replace debug assertion with exception throw to properly handle unexpected states in production code

The Debug.Fail call with "Unreachable" suggests this code path should never be hit, but the code after it is still executed. Consider throwing an InvalidOperationException instead to fail fast if this "impossible" state is reached.

dotnet/src/webdriver/RelativeBy.cs [133-134]

-Debug.Fail("Unreachable");
-return elementsObj.Select(element => (IWebElement)element).ToList().AsReadOnly();
+throw new InvalidOperationException("Unexpected state: ReadOnlyCollection with non-zero elements");

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: This is a significant improvement for production code reliability. Replacing Debug.Fail with an exception throw ensures proper error handling in all environments and prevents silent failures in production.

PR 14736 (2024-11-09)

[Maintainability] Enable or remove commented test attribute to maintain clean test code

✅ Enable or remove commented test attribute to maintain clean test code

Remove commented-out test attribute to either enable the test or remove unused code

dotnet/test/ie/IeSpecificTests.cs [363-364]

-//[Test]
+[Test]
 public void InternetExplorerOptionsToString()

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: Commented-out test attributes can lead to confusion and maintenance issues. The test should either be properly enabled or removed to maintain code clarity.

PR 14723 (2024-11-07)

[Enhancement] Correct the test function name to accurately reflect the browser being tested

✅ Correct the test function name to accurately reflect the browser being tested

Rename the test function to reflect that it's testing Edge browser instances, not Chrome instances.

py/test/selenium/webdriver/edge/edge_launcher_tests.py [28]

-def test_we_can_launch_multiple_chrome_instances(clean_driver, clean_service):
+def test_we_can_launch_multiple_edge_instances(clean_driver, clean_service):

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The function name incorrectly refers to Chrome instances instead of Edge instances. This change improves code clarity and accuracy, preventing potential confusion for developers.

[Enhancement] Update the test function name to correctly identify the driver being tested

✅ Update the test function name to correctly identify the driver being tested

Replace 'chromedriver' with 'msedgedriver' in the test function name to accurately reflect the driver being tested.

py/test/selenium/webdriver/edge/edge_service_tests.py [29]

-def test_uses_chromedriver_logging(clean_driver, driver_executable) -> None:
+def test_uses_msedgedriver_logging(clean_driver, driver_executable) -> None:

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The function name incorrectly refers to ChromeDriver instead of EdgeDriver. This change enhances code accuracy and readability, aligning the test name with its actual purpose.

[Enhancement] Correct the class name to accurately represent the service being tested

✅ Correct the class name to accurately represent the service being tested

Rename the class to reflect that it's testing EdgeDriverService, not ChromeDriverService.

py/test/selenium/webdriver/edge/edge_service_tests.py [106]

-class TestChromeDriverService:
+class TestEdgeDriverService:

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The class name incorrectly refers to ChromeDriverService instead of EdgeDriverService. This change improves code consistency and prevents potential misunderstandings about the tested service.

PR 14718 (2024-11-06)

[Possible issue] Add validation for supported authentication types when setting the token

✅ Add validation for supported authentication types when setting the token

In the token setter method, consider adding a validation check for the auth_type to ensure it's one of the supported types (Bearer or X-API-Key) before setting the token.

py/selenium/webdriver/remote/client_config.py [221-227]

 @token.setter
 def token(self, value: str) -> None:
     """Sets the token used for authentication to the remote server if
     auth_type is not basic.
 
     Support values: Bearer, X-API-Key. For others, please use `extra_headers` instead.
     """
+    if self.auth_type.lower() not in ['bearer', 'x-api-key']:
+        raise ValueError("Token can only be set for 'Bearer' or 'X-API-Key' auth types.")
     self._token = value

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: This suggestion adds important input validation, preventing incorrect usage and potential security issues. It's a significant improvement in code robustness and security.

PR 14713 (2024-11-05)

[Enhancement] Use pattern matching to simplify device type checking and assignment

✅ Use pattern matching to simplify device type checking and assignment

Consider using a switch statement or pattern matching instead of multiple if-else statements when setting active devices. This would make the code more readable and easier to maintain, especially if more device types are added in the future.

dotnet/src/webdriver/Interactions/Actions.cs [76-91]

 public Actions SetActivePointer(PointerKind kind, string name)
 {
     InputDevice device = FindDeviceById(name);
 
-    if (device == null)
+    this.activePointer = device switch
     {
-        this.activePointer = new PointerInputDevice(kind, name);
-    }
-    else
-    {
-        this.activePointer = device as PointerInputDevice
-            ?? throw new InvalidOperationException($"Device under the name \"{name}\" is not a pointer. Actual input type: {device.DeviceKind}");
-    }
+        null => new PointerInputDevice(kind, name),
+        PointerInputDevice pointer => pointer,
+        _ => throw new InvalidOperationException($"Device under the name \"{name}\" is not a pointer. Actual input type: {device.DeviceKind}")
+    };
 
     return this;
 }

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

Why: The suggestion enhances code readability and maintainability by using pattern matching instead of if-else statements. While it's a good improvement, it's not as critical as the performance enhancement in the first suggestion.

PR 14709 (2024-11-03)

[Best practice] Improve the reliability of detecting and pushing changes in the workflow

✅ Improve the reliability of detecting and pushing changes in the workflow

Consider using a more specific condition for pushing changes, such as checking the exit code of the git commit command, instead of relying on an environment variable set in a previous step.

.github/workflows/ci-renovate-rbe.yml [32-35]

-- name: Push changes
-  if: ${{ env.code_changes }} == 'true'
-  uses: ad-m/github-push-action@master
+- name: Commit and push changes
+  run: |
+    if [ -n "$(git status --porcelain)" ]; then
+      git config --local user.email "${{ env.GIT_USER_EMAIL }}"
+      git config --local user.name "${{ env.GIT_USER_NAME }}"
+      git add ./java/maven_install.json
+      git commit -m 'Repin maven dependencies'
+      git push
+    fi

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: This suggestion offers a more robust approach to detecting and pushing changes, which could prevent potential issues and improve the overall reliability of the workflow.

[Enhancement] Update the GitHub Actions checkout action to a more recent version

✅ Update the GitHub Actions checkout action to a more recent version

Consider using a more recent version of the checkout action, such as 'v3' or 'v4', to benefit from the latest features and bug fixes.

.github/workflows/ci-renovate-rbe.yml [15]

 - name: Checkout Repository
-  uses: actions/checkout@v2
+  uses: actions/checkout@v3

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: Updating to a more recent version of the checkout action can provide bug fixes and new features, potentially improving the workflow's reliability and performance.

[Enhancement] Separate package managers into individual entries for more precise control

✅ Separate package managers into individual entries for more precise control

Consider using more specific manager names for Python-related package managers. Instead of using a catch-all "pip_requirements, pip_setup, pep621", you could separate them into individual entries for more granular control.

renovate.json [26-30]

 {
-  "matchManagers": ["pip_requirements", "pip_setup", "pep621"],
+  "matchManagers": ["pip_requirements"],
+  "commitMessagePrefix": "[py]",
+  "labels": ["c-py"]
+},
+{
+  "matchManagers": ["pip_setup"],
+  "commitMessagePrefix": "[py]",
+  "labels": ["c-py"]
+},
+{
+  "matchManagers": ["pep621"],
   "commitMessagePrefix": "[py]",
   "labels": ["c-py"]
 },

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

Why: This suggestion offers improved granularity in managing Python-related package managers, which could be beneficial for more precise control. However, the current grouping might be intentional for simplicity, so the impact is moderate.

PR 14708 (2024-11-03)

[Best practice] Make PinnedScript class immutable for better thread safety and design

✅ Make PinnedScript class immutable for better thread safety and design

Consider making the PinnedScript class immutable by using read-only properties and removing the setter for ScriptId.

dotnet/src/webdriver/PinnedScript.cs [53-83]

 public string Handle { get; }
 public string Source { get; }
-internal string ScriptId { get; set; }
+internal string ScriptId { get; }

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: This suggestion promotes better design practices by making the class immutable, which can improve thread safety. However, removing the setter for ScriptId might require adjustments in other parts of the code that currently set this property.

PR 14701 (2024-11-01)

[Possible issue] Ensure that the wait condition is met before capturing and asserting the event

✅ Ensure that the wait condition is met before capturing and asserting the event

Consider moving the WebDriverWait logic into the async context manager to ensure that the wait condition is met before the event is captured and asserted.

py/test/selenium/webdriver/common/bidi_tests.py [73-82]

 async with log.mutation_events() as event:
     pages.load("dynamic.html")
     driver.find_element(By.ID, "reveal").click()
     WebDriverWait(driver, 10).until(
         lambda d: d.find_element(By.ID, "revealed").value_of_css_property("display") != "none"
     )
 
-assert event["attribute_name"] == "style"
-assert event["current_value"] == ""
-assert event["old_value"] == "display:none;"
+    assert event["attribute_name"] == "style"
+    assert event["current_value"] == ""
+    assert event["old_value"] == "display:none;"

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: Moving the WebDriverWait logic inside the async context manager ensures that the condition is satisfied before capturing and asserting the event, which can prevent race conditions and improve test reliability.

PR 14677 (2024-10-29)

[Enhancement] Rename test function to accurately reflect its purpose of testing for detached shadow root exceptions

✅ Rename test function to accurately reflect its purpose of testing for detached shadow root exceptions

Rename the test function to better reflect its purpose. The current name suggests it's testing for an invalid selector, but it's actually testing for a detached shadow root exception.

py/test/unit/selenium/webdriver/remote/error_handler_tests.py [244-247]

 @pytest.mark.parametrize("code", ErrorCode.DETACHED_SHADOW_ROOT)
-def test_raises_exception_for_invalid_selector(handler, code):
+def test_raises_exception_for_detached_shadow_root(handler, code):
     with pytest.raises(exceptions.DetachedShadowRootException):
         handler.check_response({"status": code, "value": "foo"})

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a misleading test function name and proposes a more accurate one, improving code readability and maintainability by aligning the function name with its actual purpose.

PR 14675 (2024-10-29)

[Possible bug] Fix syntax error in warning message by adding a missing comma

✅ Fix syntax error in warning message by adding a missing comma

Add the missing comma after the warning message string in the warnings.warn() call to fix the syntax error.

py/selenium/webdriver/remote/webelement.py [177-181]

 warnings.warn(
-    "using WebElement.get_attribute() has been deprecated. Please use get_dom_attribute() instead."
+    "using WebElement.get_attribute() has been deprecated. Please use get_dom_attribute() instead.",
     DeprecationWarning,
     stacklevel=2,
 )

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a syntax error due to a missing comma in the warnings.warn() call, which is crucial for the code to function properly. Adding the comma is necessary to avoid runtime errors, making this a high-impact fix.

PR 14672 (2024-10-29)

[Enhancement] Use null-coalescing operator with null-conditional operator for safer string conversion

✅ Use null-coalescing operator with null-conditional operator for safer string conversion

Consider using the null-coalescing operator (??) instead of the null-conditional operator (?.) followed by ToString(). This will provide a default empty string if the value is null, avoiding potential null reference exceptions.

dotnet/src/webdriver/ErrorResponse.cs [55]

-this.message = responseValue["message"].ToString() ?? "";
+this.message = responseValue["message"]?.ToString() ?? string.Empty;

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

Why: This suggestion enhances the code by using both the null-conditional and null-coalescing operators, ensuring that the conversion to string is safe and defaults to an empty string if null. This improves code safety and prevents potential null reference exceptions.

[Enhancement] Use pattern matching for more concise type checking and casting

✅ Use pattern matching for more concise type checking and casting

Consider using pattern matching with 'is' keyword for type checking and casting in a single step, which can make the code more concise and readable.

dotnet/src/webdriver/StackTraceElement.cs [62-69]

-if (elementAttributes.ContainsKey("lineNumber"))
+if (elementAttributes.TryGetValue("lineNumber", out var lineNumberObj) && lineNumberObj is int lineNumber)
 {
-    int lineNumber;
-    if (int.TryParse(elementAttributes["lineNumber"].ToString(), out lineNumber))
-    {
-        this.lineNumber = lineNumber;
-    }
+    this.lineNumber = lineNumber;
 }

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: The suggestion makes the code more concise and readable by using pattern matching for type checking and casting, which simplifies the logic and reduces the number of lines.

PR 14669 (2024-10-28)

[Best practice] Use null-conditional operator for safer null checking

✅ Use null-conditional operator for safer null checking

Use the null-forgiving operator (!) only when absolutely necessary. Consider using the null-conditional operator (?.) for a safer approach to null checking.

dotnet/src/webdriver/Alert.cs [50]

-return commandResponse.Value.ToString()!;
+return commandResponse.Value?.ToString() ?? string.Empty;

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: This suggestion enhances safety by using the null-conditional operator, which prevents potential null reference exceptions and improves code robustness.

PR 14666 (2024-10-28)

[Maintainability] Update method documentation to reflect its deprecated status and provide alternatives

✅ Update method documentation to reflect its deprecated status and provide alternatives

Update the method's Javadoc to mention its deprecated status and suggest alternative methods to use.

java/src/org/openqa/selenium/WebElement.java [163-170]

 /**
  * See W3C WebDriver
  * specification for more details.
  *
  * @param name The name of the attribute.
  * @return The attribute/property's current value or null if the value is not set.
+ * @deprecated This method is deprecated. Use {@link #getProperty(String)} or {@link #getDomAttribute(String)} for more precise attribute retrieval.
  */
 @Deprecated
 @Nullable String getAttribute(String name);

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

Why: Updating the Javadoc to mention the deprecation and suggest alternative methods enhances documentation quality, ensuring developers are informed about the change and can transition smoothly to recommended methods.

PR 14651 (2024-10-25)

[Enhancement] Add a home page link to the table of contents for improved navigation

✅ Add a home page link to the table of contents for improved navigation

Consider adding a home page or overview link at the top of the table of contents for better navigation and user experience.

dotnet/docs/toc.yml [1-5]

+- name: Home
+  href: index.md
 - name: WebDriver
   href: webdriver/toc.yml
   expanded: true
 - name: Support
   href: support/toc.yml

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

Why: Including a home page link at the top of the table of contents improves navigation and user experience by providing a clear starting point for users. This is a practical enhancement for better documentation usability.

PR 14619 (2024-10-18)

[Enhancement] Improve variable naming for better code readability

✅ Improve variable naming for better code readability

Consider using a more descriptive variable name instead of inter_versions. For example, all_browser_versions would better convey its purpose.

rust/src/chrome.rs [524]

-let inter_versions = all_versions.versions.into_iter();
+let all_browser_versions = all_versions.versions.into_iter();

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: The suggestion to rename inter_versions to all_browser_versions enhances code readability by making the variable's purpose clearer. This is a straightforward improvement that aligns with good naming conventions.

PR 14616 (2024-10-17)

[Best practice] Correct the error message by removing an unnecessary character

✅ Correct the error message by removing an unnecessary character

Remove the '=' sign from the error message as it appears to be a typo and doesn't add any meaningful information.

java/src/org/openqa/selenium/manager/SeleniumManager.java [198]

-throw new WebDriverException("Linux ARM64= is not supported by Selenium Manager");
+throw new WebDriverException("Linux ARM64 is not supported by Selenium Manager");

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

Why: Removing the '=' sign from the error message corrects a likely typo, improving the clarity and professionalism of the message without altering functionality.

PR 14523 (2024-09-20)

[Enhancement] Improve thread safety for managing authentication callbacks

✅ Improve thread safety for managing authentication callbacks

Consider using a more thread-safe approach for managing AUTH_CALLBACKS. Instead of using a class variable, you could use a thread-local variable or a synchronized data structure to ensure thread safety in multi-threaded environments.

rb/lib/selenium/webdriver/common/network.rb [23-26]

-AUTH_CALLBACKS = {}
+def self.auth_callbacks
+  Thread.current[:auth_callbacks] ||= {}
+end
+
 def initialize(bridge)
   @network = BiDi::Network.new(bridge.bidi)
 end

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: The suggestion to use a thread-local variable for AUTH_CALLBACKS enhances thread safety, which is crucial in multi-threaded environments. This change addresses a potential concurrency issue, making it a significant improvement.

PR 14426 (2024-08-22)

[Enhancement] Simplify the search text handling by using the trimmed text directly

✅ Simplify the search text handling by using the trimmed text directly

The method is using a complex approach to handle spaces in the search text. Consider simplifying this logic by directly using the trimmed text for searching, which would handle both single and multiple word cases more efficiently.

java/src/org/openqa/selenium/support/ui/Select.java [191-199]

-String searchText = text.contains(" ") ? getLongestSubstringWithoutSpace(text) : text;
+String trimmedText = text.trim();
+List candidates = trimmedText.isEmpty() 
+  ? element.findElements(By.tagName("option"))
+  : element.findElements(By.xpath(".//option[contains(., " + Quotes.escape(trimmedText) + ")]"));
 
-List candidates;
-if (searchText.isEmpty()) {
-  candidates = element.findElements(By.tagName("option"));
-} else {
-  candidates = element.findElements(
-    By.xpath(".//option[contains(., " + Quotes.escape(searchText) + ")]"));
-}
-

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: Simplifying the logic by using trimmed text directly improves code readability and efficiency, addressing a minor enhancement in the code.

PR 14386 (2024-08-13)

[Maintainability] Ensure proper cleanup of resources when removing authentication handlers

✅ Ensure proper cleanup of resources when removing authentication handlers

Implement a cleanup mechanism in the removeAuthenticationHandler method to ensure that any resources or intercepts associated with the handler are properly cleaned up to prevent memory leaks or dangling references.

javascript/node/selenium-webdriver/lib/network.js [78]

-this.#authHandlers.delete(id)
+if (!this.#authHandlers.has(id)) {
+  throw new Error(`No authentication handler found with ID: ${id}`);
+}
+// Perform any necessary cleanup related to the handler here
+this.#authHandlers.delete(id);

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: Implementing a cleanup mechanism when removing authentication handlers is important for maintainability. It prevents memory leaks and dangling references, ensuring the system remains efficient and stable.

PR 14191 (2024-06-26)

[Style] Remove trailing whitespace to maintain code cleanliness

✅ Remove trailing whitespace to maintain code cleanliness

Remove the trailing whitespace at the end of lines to maintain code cleanliness and adhere to style guidelines.

py/selenium/webdriver/support/relative_locator.py [66-68]

-+        
 elements = driver.find_elements(locate_with(By.CSS_SELECTOR, "p").above(lowest))
-+

Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

Why: The suggestion is correct in aiming to remove unnecessary whitespace, which aligns with good coding practices, though it's a relatively minor improvement.

PR 14070 (2024-06-03)

[Enhancement] Add assertions to verify the dialog is dismissed to make the test more robust

✅ Add assertions to verify the dialog is dismissed to make the test more robust

Consider adding assertions to verify that the dialog is indeed dismissed after calling fedcmDriver.setDelayEnabled(false). This will make the test more robust and ensure the expected behavior.

java/test/org/openqa/selenium/federatedcredentialmanagement/FederatedCredentialManagementTest.java [83-85]

 void testDismissDialog() {
   fedcmDriver.setDelayEnabled(false);
   assertNull(fedcmDriver.getFederatedCredentialManagementDialog());
+  // Additional assertions to verify dialog dismissal
+  assertFalse(fedcmDriver.isDialogVisible());
+  assertEquals("Expected message", fedcmDriver.getDialogMessage());

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

Why: Adding more assertions would indeed make the test more robust by verifying additional expected behaviors, although the existing test already checks the main functionality.

[Enhancement] Add assertions to verify account selection behavior to make the test more robust

✅ Add assertions to verify account selection behavior to make the test more robust

Similar to the testDismissDialog method, add assertions in the testSelectAccount method to verify the dialog state and account selection behavior.

java/test/org/openqa/selenium/federatedcredentialmanagement/FederatedCredentialManagementTest.java [115-117]

 void testSelectAccount() {
   fedcmDriver.setDelayEnabled(false);
   assertNull(fedcmDriver.getFederatedCredentialManagementDialog());
+  // Additional assertions to verify account selection
+  assertTrue(fedcmDriver.isAccountSelected());
+  assertEquals("Expected account", fedcmDriver.getSelectedAccount());

Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

Why: Similar to the previous suggestion, adding assertions enhances the test's robustness by checking more conditions, which is beneficial for ensuring the correct behavior of the system.