-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add getUserByEmail
query
#3339
Add getUserByEmail
query
#3339
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
🗞 GraphQL SummaryView schema changes@@ -5293,8 +5293,11 @@
"""Look up a user by its ID"""
user(id: ID!): User!
+ """Returns a user for a given email address"""
+ userByEmail(email: String!): User
+
"""Look up users"""
users(input: UserListInput = {count: 25, order: ASC, page: 1, sort: "id"}): UserListOutput!
wait(delay: String!): Boolean!
}
|
d116ee6
to
4cae7d0
Compare
@CarsonF - Can you throw a 🦴 on that type error in the EdgeDB repo? |
You're returning |
4cae7d0
to
525424e
Compare
Ok I think I made a miss here. The checkEmail is anonymous, no access policies. The new method is with access policies, so they cannot be combined. |
So it doesn't work to just call it with that anonymous session? |
525424e
to
bb9b79c
Compare
It could be fine for Neo4j, but not EdgeDB. |
Monday Story #0322