Add Permissions to Conversations

[NolanTrem]

Important

Add user-specific permission checks to conversation operations, ensuring users can only access their own conversations.

• Permissions:
  • Add user-specific permission checks in get_conversation, delete_conversation, and get_conversations_overview in conversations.py.
  • Modify conversations_router.py to pass user IDs for permission checks in list_conversations, get_conversation, and delete_conversation.
• Tests:
  • Add ConversationsIntegrationUser.test.ts to test user-specific access restrictions.
• Misc:
  • Remove verify_conversation_access method from conversations.py.
  • Update management_service.py to handle user-specific permissions in conversation-related methods.

^{This description was created by for 87d9046. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 87d9046 in 1 minute and 2 seconds

More details

• Looked at 851 lines of code in 5 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 8 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. js/sdk/__tests__/ConversationsIntegrationUser.test.ts:22

• Draft comment:
  Hardcoding credentials like email and password is a security risk. Consider using environment variables or a secure configuration management system to manage sensitive information.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
  This is a test file, and using hardcoded test credentials in tests is a common and accepted practice. The credentials are clearly test/example credentials (note the domain example.com and password "change_me_immediately"). Using environment variables for test credentials would add unnecessary complexity. These aren't real production credentials that need protection.
  Maybe there could be a security risk if these test credentials accidentally made it into production. Or maybe using environment variables would make the tests more configurable.
  The credentials are clearly test-only and the risk of them making it to production is minimal since they use example.com domains. Test configurability isn't a major concern here since these are integration tests with a clear testing flow.
  The comment should be deleted. Using hardcoded test credentials is appropriate in this context and the security concern is not valid for test files.

2. js/sdk/__tests__/ConversationsIntegrationUser.test.ts:30

• Draft comment:
  Hardcoding credentials like email and password is a security risk. Consider using environment variables or a secure configuration management system to manage sensitive information. This comment applies to other instances in this file as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

3. js/sdk/__tests__/ConversationsIntegrationUser.test.ts:50

• Draft comment:
  Hardcoding credentials like email and password is a security risk. Consider using environment variables or a secure configuration management system to manage sensitive information. This comment applies to other instances in this file as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

4. js/sdk/__tests__/ConversationsIntegrationUser.test.ts:62

• Draft comment:
  Hardcoding credentials like email and password is a security risk. Consider using environment variables or a secure configuration management system to manage sensitive information. This comment applies to other instances in this file as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

5. js/sdk/__tests__/ConversationsIntegrationUser.test.ts:248

• Draft comment:
  Hardcoding credentials like email and password is a security risk. Consider using environment variables or a secure configuration management system to manage sensitive information. This comment applies to other instances in this file as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

6. js/sdk/__tests__/ConversationsIntegrationUser.test.ts:256

• Draft comment:
  Hardcoding credentials like email and password is a security risk. Consider using environment variables or a secure configuration management system to manage sensitive information. This comment applies to other instances in this file as well.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Marked as duplicate.

7. py/core/database/conversations.py:89

• Draft comment:
  Using a subquery to filter user IDs might be inefficient. Consider filtering directly on the user_id column instead.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The SQL query in get_conversations_overview method uses a subquery to filter user IDs, which might be inefficient. Consider using a direct filter on the user_id column instead.

8. py/core/database/conversations.py:332

• Draft comment:
  Using a subquery to filter user IDs might be inefficient. Consider filtering directly on the user_id column instead.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50%
  The SQL query in get_conversation method uses a subquery to filter user IDs, which might be inefficient. Consider using a direct filter on the user_id column instead.

Workflow ID: wflow_c7qXiGdDcnfVVNUL

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.