Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RHEL10 support for Provisioning tests #17192

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 25, 2024

Conversation

shubhamsg199
Copy link
Contributor

Problem Statement

Missing support of RHEL10 for Provisioning tests

Solution

Add support of RHEL10 for Provisioning tests

@shubhamsg199 shubhamsg199 added No-CherryPick PR doesnt need CherryPick to previous branches Stream Introduced in or relating directly to Satellite Stream/Master labels Dec 17, 2024
@shubhamsg199 shubhamsg199 self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
@shubhamsg199 shubhamsg199 requested review from a team as code owners December 17, 2024 12:52
pytest_fixtures/component/provision_pxe.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
robottelo/constants/__init__.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
robottelo/constants/__init__.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@shubhamsg199 shubhamsg199 force-pushed the rhel10_support_prov branch 2 times, most recently from acafeac to 15c7d90 Compare December 17, 2024 16:34
@Gauravtalreja1
Copy link
Collaborator

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py
provisioning: true
env:
     BROKER_SSH_BACKEND: hussh

@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 added the QETestCoverage Issues and PRs relating to a Satellite bug label Dec 17, 2024
@Satellite-QE
Copy link
Collaborator

PRT Result

Build Number: 9661
Build Status: UNSTABLE
PRT Comment: pytest tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py --external-logging --include-onprem-provisioning
Test Result : = 12 failed, 5 passed, 8 skipped, 5 deselected, 3290 warnings, 7 errors in 19888.20s (5:31:28) =

@Satellite-QE Satellite-QE added the PRT-Failed Indicates that latest PRT run is failed for the PR label Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@shweta83 shweta83 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ack

@Gauravtalreja1
Copy link
Collaborator

@shubhamsg199 Could you investigate EL10 repo enable failures in PRT?

@shubhamsg199
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubhamsg199 Could you investigate EL10 repo enable failures in PRT?

@Gauravtalreja1 Fixed with the latest push

@Gauravtalreja1
Copy link
Collaborator

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py
provisioning: true
env:
     BROKER_SSH_BACKEND: hussh

@Satellite-QE
Copy link
Collaborator

PRT Result

Build Number: 9673
Build Status: UNSTABLE
PRT Comment: pytest tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py --external-logging --include-onprem-provisioning
Test Result : = 14 failed, 4 passed, 8 skipped, 5 deselected, 3086 warnings, 6 errors in 17971.83s (4:59:31) =

@shubhamsg199 shubhamsg199 force-pushed the rhel10_support_prov branch 2 times, most recently from acb2756 to cf897dd Compare December 20, 2024 16:01
Signed-off-by: Shubham Ganar <sganar@redhat.com>
@Gauravtalreja1
Copy link
Collaborator

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py -k test_rhel_pxe_provisioning
provisioning: true
env:
     BROKER_SSH_BACKEND: hussh

@Satellite-QE
Copy link
Collaborator

PRT Result

Build Number: 9686
Build Status: UNSTABLE
PRT Comment: pytest tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py -k test_rhel_pxe_provisioning --external-logging --include-onprem-provisioning
Test Result : = 11 failed, 4 passed, 17 deselected, 2739 warnings, 5 errors in 16449.68s (4:34:09) =

@Gauravtalreja1
Copy link
Collaborator

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py -k test_rhel_pxe_provisioning_secureboot_enabled
provisioning: true
env:
     BROKER_SSH_BACKEND: hussh

@Satellite-QE
Copy link
Collaborator

PRT Result

Build Number: 9700
Build Status: UNSTABLE
PRT Comment: pytest tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py -k test_rhel_pxe_provisioning_secureboot_enabled --external-logging --include-onprem-provisioning
Test Result : ===== 3 passed, 33 deselected, 757 warnings, 1 error in 4834.49s (1:20:34) =====

@Gauravtalreja1
Copy link
Collaborator

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py -k test_rhel_pxe_provisioning_secureboot_enabled
provisioning: true
env:
     BROKER_SSH_BACKEND: hussh

@Satellite-QE
Copy link
Collaborator

PRT Result

Build Number: 9701
Build Status: UNSTABLE
PRT Comment: pytest tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py -k test_rhel_pxe_provisioning_secureboot_enabled --external-logging --include-onprem-provisioning
Test Result : ==== 1 failed, 3 passed, 33 deselected, 740 warnings in 6365.85s (1:46:05) =====

@Gauravtalreja1
Copy link
Collaborator

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py::test_rhel_pxe_provisioning[rhel10-ipv4-uefi]
provisioning: true
env:
     BROKER_SSH_BACKEND: hussh

@Satellite-QE
Copy link
Collaborator

PRT Result

Build Number: 9702
Build Status: UNSTABLE
PRT Comment: pytest tests/foreman/api/test_provisioning.py::test_rhel_pxe_provisioning[rhel10-ipv4-uefi] --external-logging --include-onprem-provisioning
Test Result : ================= 1 failed, 17 warnings in 2911.45s (0:48:31) ==================

Copy link
Collaborator

@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK, EL10 provisioning failure with beta repositories in PRT is expected

@Gauravtalreja1 Gauravtalreja1 merged commit f3cd056 into SatelliteQE:master Dec 25, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
No-CherryPick PR doesnt need CherryPick to previous branches PRT-Failed Indicates that latest PRT run is failed for the PR QETestCoverage Issues and PRs relating to a Satellite bug Stream Introduced in or relating directly to Satellite Stream/Master
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants