refactor: remove TypeORM completely #226
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update transitions several modules from TypeORM to Prisma for database operations, reflecting a significant architectural shift. Key changes involve refactoring service methods, updating database URL configurations, and altering fields and constraints in the schema. The primary focus is on improving performance, database connection handling, and aligning with Prisma's features. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API
participant Prisma
participant PostgreSQL
Client ->> API: Create/Update/Delete User/Question/Answer
API ->> Prisma: Perform Database Operations
Prisma ->> PostgreSQL: Execute Queries
PostgreSQL -->> Prisma: Return Results
Prisma -->> API: Success/Failure Response
API -->> Client: Success/Failure Response
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #226 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.28% 91.87% +0.59%
==========================================
Files 65 57 -8
Lines 2777 2413 -364
Branches 340 322 -18
==========================================
- Hits 2535 2217 -318
+ Misses 231 196 -35
+ Partials 11 0 -11 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Nictheboy
force-pushed
the
deprecate-typeorm
branch
8 times, most recently
from
c029924 to
25ffeb5
Compare
Nictheboy
force-pushed
the
deprecate-typeorm
branch
4 times, most recently
from
ebc9da0 to
8bfaaea
Compare
Nictheboy
force-pushed
the
deprecate-typeorm
branch
from
8bfaaea to
675e796
Compare
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 17
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/avatars/avatars.controller.ts (2)
Line range hint
41-41: The errors reported by the static analysis tool regarding decorators are due to a configuration issue. EnsureunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledis set totruein your TypeScript or NestJS configuration to resolve these errors.// tsconfig.json or nestjs.config.json { "compilerOptions": { "unsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabled": true } }Also applies to: 56-56, 57-57, 87-87, 88-88, 89-89, 118-118
Line range hint
129-129: Theelseclause after athrowstatement is unnecessary and can be removed to simplify the control flow.- } else throw new InvalidAvatarTypeError(type); + throw new InvalidAvatarTypeError(type);src/auth/session.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
99-147: TherefreshSessionmethod's update to use Prisma for session management is correctly implemented. Coverage for this method should be verified.# Verify coverage for the refreshSession method rg --type python "test_sessions" | grep "refreshSession"src/questions/questions.controller.ts (1)
Line range hint
71-71: Please ensure decorators are configured correctly in your NestJS setup.It seems like your project is misconfigured to handle decorators properly. Please ensure that the
unsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption is set totruein your TypeScript or NestJS configuration to resolve these parsing issues.Also applies to: 73-73, 74-74, 75-75, 105-105, 107-107, 137-137, 138-138, 139-139, 140-140, 165-165, 166-166, 167-167, 192-192, 193-193, 207-207, 208-208, 210-210, 211-211, 212-212
src/answer/answer.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
34-34: Please verify the configuration for decorators in this file.It appears that there is a misconfiguration with decorators. Ensure that
unsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledis set totruein your TypeScript configuration.Also applies to: 36-36, 38-38, 40-40
src/questions/questions.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
846-846: Default parameter usage issue.Default parameters should follow all required parameters to avoid confusion and potential bugs in function calls. Consider adjusting the parameter order or making them all required.
- async inviteUsersToAnswerQuestion( - questionId: number, - userId: number = 0, // Example adjustment needed + async inviteUserstoAnswerQuestion( + userId: number, + questionId: number,Incorrect usage of decorators.
The static analysis has flagged that decorators are used incorrectly. Ensure that decorators are applied correctly as per NestJS and TypeScript guidelines, or adjust the TypeScript configuration if these are parameter decorators.
Also applies to: 925-925
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml,!**/*.yaml
Files selected for processing (38)
- .github/workflows/test-coverage.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (3 hunks)
- prisma/migrations/20240617031314_refactor_remove_typeorm/migration.sql (3 hunks)
- prisma/schema.prisma (23 hunks)
- sample.env (1 hunks)
- src/answer/answer.module.ts (2 hunks)
- src/answer/answer.prisma (3 hunks)
- src/answer/answer.service.ts (16 hunks)
- src/app.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/attitude/attitude.prisma (1 hunks)
- src/auth/auth.module.ts (2 hunks)
- src/auth/session.prisma (1 hunks)
- src/auth/session.service.ts (5 hunks)
- src/avatars/avatars.controller.ts (2 hunks)
- src/avatars/avatars.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/avatars/avatars.prisma (1 hunks)
- src/avatars/avatars.service.ts (4 hunks)
- src/comments/DTO/comment.dto.ts (1 hunks)
- src/comments/comment.error.ts (1 hunks)
- src/comments/comment.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/comments/comment.prisma (3 hunks)
- src/comments/comment.service.ts (10 hunks)
- src/comments/commentable.enum.ts (1 hunks)
- src/common/config/configuration.ts (2 hunks)
- src/groups/groups.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/groups/groups.prisma (5 hunks)
- src/groups/groups.service.ts (21 hunks)
- src/questions/questions.controller.ts (1 hunks)
- src/questions/questions.es.prisma (1 hunks)
- src/questions/questions.invitation.prisma (1 hunks)
- src/questions/questions.module.ts (2 hunks)
- src/questions/questions.prisma (4 hunks)
- src/questions/questions.service.ts (23 hunks)
- src/topics/topics.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/topics/topics.prisma (2 hunks)
- src/topics/topics.service.ts (3 hunks)
- src/users/users.prisma (3 hunks)
- test/avatars.e2e-spec.ts (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
- src/users/users.prisma (no review received)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- src/auth/session.prisma
- src/comments/comment.module.ts
- src/comments/comment.prisma
- src/questions/questions.invitation.prisma
- src/questions/questions.prisma
Additional context used
Biome
src/avatars/avatars.controller.ts
[error] 41-41: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 56-56: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 57-57: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 87-87: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 88-88: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 89-89: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 118-118: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 129-129: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
src/comments/comment.service.ts
[error] 27-27: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 160-160: This default parameter should follow the last required parameter or should be a required parameter. (lint/style/useDefaultParameterLast)
The last required parameter is here:
A default parameter that precedes a required parameter cannot be omitted at call site.
Unsafe fix: Turn the parameter into a required parameter.
[error] 183-225: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
src/questions/questions.controller.ts
[error] 71-71: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 73-73: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 74-74: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 75-75: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 105-105: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 107-107: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 137-137: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 138-138: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 139-139: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 140-140: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 165-165: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 166-166: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 167-167: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 192-192: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 193-193: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 207-207: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 208-208: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 210-210: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 211-211: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 212-212: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.src/answer/answer.service.ts
[error] 34-34: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 36-36: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 38-38: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 40-40: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 104-150: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 184-221: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 440-475: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
src/groups/groups.service.ts
[error] 51-51: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 53-53: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 740-770: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
src/questions/questions.service.ts
[error] 59-59: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 62-62: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 64-64: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 66-66: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 680-720: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 754-801: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 846-846: This default parameter should follow the last required parameter or should be a required parameter. (lint/style/useDefaultParameterLast)
The last required parameter is here:
A default parameter that precedes a required parameter cannot be omitted at call site.
Unsafe fix: Turn the parameter into a required parameter.
[error] 885-920: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 925-925: This default parameter should follow the last required parameter or should be a required parameter. (lint/style/useDefaultParameterLast)
The last required parameter is here:
A default parameter that precedes a required parameter cannot be omitted at call site.
Unsafe fix: Turn the parameter into a required parameter.
[error] 1166-1205: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/avatars/avatars.service.ts
[warning] 104-104: src/avatars/avatars.service.ts#L104
Added line #L104 was not covered by tests
[warning] 148-148: src/avatars/avatars.service.ts#L148
Added line #L148 was not covered by tests
[warning] 163-163: src/avatars/avatars.service.ts#L163
Added line #L163 was not covered by testssrc/comments/comment.service.ts
[warning] 38-38: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L38
Added line #L38 was not covered by tests
[warning] 104-104: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L104
Added line #L104 was not covered by tests
[warning] 166-166: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L166
Added line #L166 was not covered by tests
[warning] 184-185: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L184-L185
Added lines #L184 - L185 were not covered by tests
[warning] 199-199: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L199
Added line #L199 was not covered by tests
[warning] 234-234: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L234
Added line #L234 was not covered by tests
[warning] 255-255: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L255
Added line #L255 was not covered by testssrc/answer/answer.service.ts
[warning] 315-315: src/answer/answer.service.ts#L315
Added line #L315 was not covered by tests
[warning] 389-389: src/answer/answer.service.ts#L389
Added line #L389 was not covered by tests
[warning] 586-586: src/answer/answer.service.ts#L586
Added line #L586 was not covered by testssrc/groups/groups.service.ts
[warning] 172-172: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L172
Added line #L172 was not covered by tests
[warning] 375-375: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L375
Added line #L375 was not covered by tests
[warning] 388-388: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L388
Added line #L388 was not covered by tests
[warning] 686-686: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L686
Added line #L686 was not covered by tests
[warning] 697-697: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L697
Added line #L697 was not covered by tests
[warning] 708-708: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L708
Added line #L708 was not covered by tests
[warning] 741-741: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L741
Added line #L741 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (65)
src/questions/questions.es.prisma (2)
1-1: Ensure that the import path forQuestionis correct and that the module exports a Prisma model.
5-5: The relation mapping looks correct. Verify that thequestionIdfield is properly indexed in the database to optimize query performance.Verification successful
The
questionIdfield is indeed indexed in the schema, as indicated by multiple occurrences of@@index([questionId])across different files, includingsrc/questions/questions.es.prisma.
src/questions/questions.es.prisma: @@index([questionId])src/questions/questions.prisma: @@index([questionId], map: "IDX_6544f7f7579bf88e3c62f995f8")src/questions/questions.prisma: @@index([questionId], map: "IDX_a0ee1672e103ed0a0266f217a3")src/questions/questions.prisma: @@index([questionId], map: "IDX_fab99c5e4fc380d9b7f9abbbb0")These confirm that
questionIdis properly indexed in the database schema, optimizing query performance.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that 'questionId' is indexed in the database schema. cat src/questions/questions.es.prisma | grep '@@index([questionId])'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any indexing related to `questionId` in the entire codebase. rg '@@index' -t prisma # Confirm the presence of the `questionId` field in the schema. rg 'questionId' -t prismaLength of output: 110
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any indexing related to `questionId` in the entire codebase. rg '@@index' # Confirm the presence of the `questionId` field in the schema. rg 'questionId'Length of output: 51051
src/comments/DTO/comment.dto.ts (2)
8-8: The usage ofCommentCommentabletypeEnumforcommentable_typealigns with the new Prisma model. This is a good refactor to maintain consistency with the database schema.
1-1: Ensure that the import forCommentCommentabletypeEnumis correct and that it is indeed exported from@prisma/client.src/comments/commentable.enum.ts (1)
1-1: Ensure that the import forCommentCommentabletypeEnumis correct and that it is indeed exported from@prisma/client.src/avatars/avatars.prisma (1)
4-21: The Prisma model forAvataris well-defined with appropriate field types and default values. Ensure that the database schema is aligned with these definitions.Verification successful
The Prisma migration file confirms that the
avatartable in the database schema is aligned with theAvatarmodel definitions. The table structure, including field types, default values, and constraints, matches the model specified in theavatars.prismafile.
- The
idfield is defined asSERIAL NOT NULLwith a primary key constraint.- The
urlandnamefields are defined asVARCHAR NOT NULL.- The
createdAtfield is defined asTIMESTAMP(6) NOT NULLwith a default value ofCURRENT_TIMESTAMP.- The
avatarTypefield is defined asVARCHAR NOT NULL.- The
usageCountfield is defined asINTEGER NOT NULLwith a default value of0.This confirms that the database schema is correctly aligned with the Prisma model.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify database schema alignment with 'Avatar' model definitions. cat src/avatars/avatars.prisma | grep '@@map("avatar")'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the entire Avatar model definition from the Prisma schema file ast-grep --lang prisma --pattern $'model Avatar { $$$ }'Length of output: 172
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the entire Avatar model definition from the Prisma schema file using rg rg -A 10 'model Avatar {' src/avatars/avatars.prismaLength of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the entire Avatar model definition from the Prisma schema file using rg with corrected regex pattern rg -A 10 'model Avatar \{' src/avatars/avatars.prismaLength of output: 488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the database schema alignment with 'Avatar' model definitions # Note: Replace 'your_database' and 'your_user' with actual database name and user # Connect to the database and describe the 'avatar' table structure psql -d your_database -U your_user -c '\d+ avatar'Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Prisma migration files and inspect their content to verify the database schema alignment with the 'Avatar' model definitions rg 'CREATE TABLE.*avatar' -A 20Length of output: 1822
src/topics/topics.module.ts (2)
12-12: The import ofPrismaModuleis correctly added, supporting the transition from TypeORM to Prisma.
17-17: The inclusion ofPrismaModulein the module's imports array is appropriate and ensures the availability of Prisma services within the Topics module.src/comments/comment.error.ts (2)
1-1: Correct import ofCommentCommentabletypeEnumfrom@prisma/client, aligning with the PR objectives to standardize enums.
6-6: Updating the parameter type toCommentCommentabletypeEnumenhances type safety and consistency within the application.src/groups/groups.module.ts (2)
12-12: Proper integration ofAvatarsModuleensures avatar functionality is available within the Groups module.
13-13: The inclusion ofPrismaModulein the imports ensures that Prisma's services are available for the Groups module, aligning with the overall transition from TypeORM to Prisma.Also applies to: 26-26
src/auth/auth.module.ts (2)
13-13: The import ofPrismaModuleis correctly placed and aligns with the transition from TypeORM to Prisma.
32-32: Correct integration ofPrismaModuleinto the module's imports array to enable database interactions through Prisma.src/app.module.ts (3)
2-2: Addition ofConfigModuleproperly sets up application-wide configurations.
4-4: Proper integration ofServeStaticModuleto serve static files, enhancing the app's functionality.
8-8: Configuration forServeStaticModuleis correctly set up with appropriate paths for file serving.src/attitude/attitude.prisma (1)
38-38: Ensure that theupdatedAtfield's behavior aligns with the application's requirements for timestamp updates.src/avatars/avatars.module.ts (1)
3-3: The addition of filesystem checks and directory creation indiskStorageconfiguration is a good practice to ensure the upload path exists before saving files.sample.env (1)
18-18: Addingconnection_limit=16to thePRISMA_DATABASE_URLis a prudent configuration to manage database connections more effectively.src/topics/topics.prisma (1)
36-36: Making theuserAgentfield nullable in theTopicSearchLogmodel can be beneficial for logs where user agent data might not always be available.prisma/migrations/20240617031314_refactor_remove_typeorm/migration.sql (4)
26-26: Setting the default value ofupdated_attoCURRENT_TIMESTAMPensures that the column is always up-to-date without manual intervention. This is a good practice for maintaining accurate record timestamps.
58-58: Ensure that the dropping of theanswer_user_attitudetable is coordinated with any application logic that might still be referencing this table to prevent runtime errors.Verification successful
The search results show that the only references to the
answer_user_attitudetable are within the migration files themselves. There are no references in the application logic in thesrcdirectory or elsewhere in the repository. This suggests that the application logic has already been updated to remove dependencies on this table.
- No references to
answer_user_attitudefound in the application code.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to 'answer_user_attitude' in the application code. rg 'answer_user_attitude' src/Length of output: 30
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to 'answer_user_attitude' in the entire repository. rg 'answer_user_attitude'Length of output: 2901
23-39: TheDROP NOT NULLconstraints onuser_agentacross various tables will make the field nullable. Confirm that the application logic handles null values appropriately to avoid runtime errors.
16-21: Dropping foreign keys and the entireanswer_user_attitudetable will result in data loss. Ensure that this is the intended outcome and that backups or data migrations are handled appropriately before applying these changes.test/avatars.e2e-spec.ts (1)
3-3: The import ofAvatarTypefrom@prisma/clientaligns with the refactor to use Prisma. Ensure that all methods and tests that useAvatarTypehave been updated accordingly.src/avatars/avatars.controller.ts (1)
18-18: The import ofAvatarTypefrom@prisma/clientcorrects the previous dependency on a legacy entity. This change is crucial for maintaining consistency with the new database management system.src/topics/topics.service.ts (2)
81-91: Logging the search operation along with its duration is a good practice for performance monitoring. Ensure that sensitive information is not logged, especiallyuserAgentandip.
103-103: Throwing aTopicNotFoundErrorwhen a topic is not found is appropriate. Ensure that the error handling on the client side is equipped to manage these exceptions gracefully.src/groups/groups.prisma (1)
19-19: UpdatedupdatedAtfields to use Prisma's@updatedAt. This automatically handles the update timestamp whenever the record is modified, ensuring data consistency.Also applies to: 36-36, 53-53, 65-65, 80-80
.github/workflows/test.yml (2)
25-25: UpdatedPRISMA_DATABASE_URLto includeconnection_limit=16. This helps manage database connections more efficiently under load, aligning with the changes made to the PostgreSQL container settings.
51-51: 1. Renamed the PostgreSQL container for more identifiable logging and management.
2. Increasedmax_connectionsandshared_buffersto optimize the database performance for testing environments. These changes are crucial for handling larger loads during testing.Also applies to: 76-80
.github/workflows/test-coverage.yml (2)
24-24: Identical update toPRISMA_DATABASE_URLas intest.yml, ensuring consistency across workflow configurations.
50-50: Similar updates to PostgreSQL settings as intest.yml, tailored for optimizing the database during test coverage runs. Consistent application of these settings across different workflows is good for maintaining predictable environment behavior.Also applies to: 76-80
src/answer/answer.prisma (1)
21-21: 1. UpdatedupdatedAtto use Prisma's automatic handling with@updatedAt, which is a best practice for ORM usage.
2. MadeuserAgentfield nullable inAnswerQueryLog, which allows flexibility in logging requests where the user agent might not be present.Also applies to: 68-68
src/avatars/avatars.service.ts (4)
10-10: Constructor correctly initializesprismaService, ensuring that database operations are handled through Prisma.
41-89: Refactored initialization logic using Prisma transactions is well implemented. It ensures atomicity and consistency during the avatar setup process.
92-100: Thesavemethod has been updated to use Prisma for creating avatar records. This change aligns with the PR's objective of removing TypeORM.
177-183: TheisAvatarExistsmethod correctly uses the Prismacountmethod to check for avatar existence. Good use of Prisma's querying capabilities.src/auth/session.service.ts (1)
23-23: Constructor correctly initializesprismaServicefor handling session-related operations through Prisma.src/questions/questions.controller.ts (3)
86-86: This implementation of search functionality looks robust and well-handled.
86-86: Adding questions is handled properly with appropriate logging and authentication checks.
86-86: Update functionality is implemented correctly, ensuring data integrity and security through proper authentication.src/answer/answer.service.ts (1)
315-315: These new lines of code are not covered by tests.Please ensure to add unit tests to cover these critical parts of your service logic, especially since they involve database interactions and business logic.
Also applies to: 389-389, 586-586
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 315-315: src/answer/answer.service.ts#L315
Added line #L315 was not covered by testssrc/groups/groups.service.ts (14)
56-56: The addition ofprismaServiceas a dependency in the constructor is consistent with the removal of TypeORM and aligns with the PR's objective to transition to Prisma. This change should facilitate more streamlined database operations.
67-76: This method uses Prisma'sfindUniqueto check if a group exists. The query correctly checks fordeletedAt: nullto ensure only active groups are considered. Good use of Prisma for concise and clear database queries.
304-322: Fetching group details and ownership checks are correctly separated into two distinct queries, which is good for separation of concerns. The error handling is robust, ensuring that a meaningful error is thrown if the group does not exist or has no owner.
Line range hint
335-363: The method for fetching a group's details is comprehensive, including counts of members, questions, and answers. This method effectively uses Prisma's capabilities to aggregate and filter data. Ensure that performance is monitored, as this might become a hotspot.
388-393: Fetching the group profile is straightforward and correctly handles the case where the profile might not exist. Good use of Prisma for clear and concise database queries.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 388-388: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L388
Added line #L388 was not covered by tests
533-552: The join group functionality checks for the group's existence and whether the user is already a member before creating a new membership. This is a critical check to prevent duplicate memberships.
560-580: The quit group functionality properly checks for group existence and user membership before allowing a user to quit. This method should ensure that users can only quit groups they are part of.
Line range hint
593-655: The method for fetching group members handles pagination and ensures that only current members are considered. This is a complex method that appears to be well-handled using Prisma's capabilities.
686-718: Fetching paginated group questions is correctly implemented, with checks to ensure the reference question exists. This method handles pagination well and uses Prisma efficiently.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 686-686: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L686
Added line #L686 was not covered by tests
[warning] 697-697: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L697
Added line #L697 was not covered by tests
[warning] 708-708: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L708
Added line #L708 was not covered by tests
741-750: The method for fetching group questions without a start ID is well implemented, providing a straightforward way to fetch the latest questions. This is a good use of Prisma's querying capabilities.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 741-741: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L741
Added line #L741 was not covered by tests
Line range hint
404-467: The update group functionality is well-handled, with checks for group existence, user membership, and valid group names. Consider adding a transaction to ensure that updates to the group and its profile are atomic.
471-512: The delete group functionality is robust, with checks for group existence and ownership. The method correctly marks the group, its profile, and all memberships as deleted. Ensure that these deletions are handled in a transaction to maintain data integrity.
122-129: Creating a group membership immediately after the group ensures the creator is marked as an owner. This is a critical step and is well implemented here. Again, consider wrapping this in a transaction with the previous group and profile creation steps.
104-119: The creation of a new group and its profile is handled well. The separation into two distinct Prisma operations (group.createandgroupProfile.create) is appropriate and maintains transactional clarity. Ensure that these operations are wrapped in a transaction to guarantee atomicity.prisma/schema.prisma (3)
40-40: Ensure consistent use of Prisma's@updatedAtdirective across all models for theupdatedAtfields.
87-87: TheuserAgentfield has been made nullable across various logs. This change aligns with the broader goal of accommodating entries where user agent data might not be available.Also applies to: 288-288, 502-502, 521-521, 582-582
151-151: UpdatedupdatedAtfields to use Prisma's@updatedAtdirective, ensuring that the timestamp is automatically updated whenever the record is modified. This is a good practice for maintaining accurate record timestamps.Also applies to: 315-315, 332-332, 349-349, 361-361, 376-376, 462-462, 674-674
src/questions/questions.service.ts (4)
78-80: Usage of an optionalprismaClientparameter for transaction support.This pattern allows for greater flexibility in transaction management, which can be particularly useful in complex operations involving multiple steps or interactions with different parts of the database.
Also applies to: 105-107
155-180: Use ofPrismaClientin a transaction in theaddQuestionmethod.This is a good use of Prisma's transaction capabilities to ensure that all database operations within the scope of adding a question are atomic and succeed or fail together.
211-219: MethodhasFollowedQuestionefficiently checks if a user has followed a question.Using
countis more performative than retrieving all records, especially when only existence needs to be verified.
Line range hint
680-720: Redundantelseclauses detected.
[REFACTOR_SUGGESTion]
Theseelseclauses are unnecessary as the preceding branches terminate early (either by returning or throwing an error). Removing these will improve the readability of the code.- else { + // Removed unnecessary else clauseAlso applies to: 754-801, 1166-1205
prisma/migrations/20240617031314_refactor_remove_typeorm/migration.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/topics/topics.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
44-91: The implementation ofsearchTopicsseems correct, but adding detailed logging for the search operation and the result processing could enhance traceability and debugging.+ console.log(`Search initiated for keywords: ${keywords}`); + console.log(`Search results processed: ${data.length} topics found`);src/answer/answer.service.ts (1)
Line range hint
83-188: The pagination logic ingetQuestionAnswersis complex and involves conditional branching. Adding detailed logging at each step can help trace the behavior and identify issues more easily.+ console.log(`Fetching answers for questionId: ${questionId}, pageStart: ${pageStart}, pageSize: ${pageSize}`); + console.log(`Answers fetched: ${currDto.length}`);src/users/users.service.ts (4)
Line range hint
1-1: Review the file header for completeness and accuracy.Consider adding more details in the file header, such as the purpose of the
UsersServiceclass and its interaction with other parts of the system, to improve code documentation.
Line range hint
110-110: Ensure proper error handling when the user is not found.The method
findUserRecordOrThrowthrows aUserIdNotFoundErrorif no user is found. This is good practice as it ensures that the caller handles the case where the user does not exist. However, ensure that all callers of this method properly handle this exception to avoid unhandled exceptions that could disrupt the service.
Line range hint
252-252: Review the logic for sending registration email codes.The method
sendRegisterEmailCodehas a TODO comment about adding logic to determine if a code is sent too frequently. This is important to prevent abuse of the email system. Consider implementing a rate-limiting mechanism or using a third-party service that provides such functionality to enhance security.
Line range hint
525-525: Review the method for handling follow relationships.The method
addFollowRelationshipchecks if the follower ID is the same as the followee ID and throws aFollowYourselfErrorif true. This is a good security measure to prevent users from following themselves. However, ensure that this logic is consistently applied across all methods that manage follow relationships to maintain integrity in user interactions.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (20)
- .github/workflows/test-coverage.yml (3 hunks)
- prisma/migrations/20240414154153_deprecate_answer_attitude/migration.sql (1 hunks)
- prisma/migrations/20240618022355_refactor_remove_typeorm/migration.sql (1 hunks)
- prisma/schema.prisma (22 hunks)
- src/answer/answer.prisma (3 hunks)
- src/answer/answer.service.ts (17 hunks)
- src/auth/session.prisma (1 hunks)
- src/comments/comment.prisma (3 hunks)
- src/comments/comment.service.ts (10 hunks)
- src/common/prisma/prisma.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/common/prisma/prisma.service.ts (1 hunks)
- src/common/prisma/soft-delete.decorator.ts (1 hunks)
- src/groups/groups.prisma (5 hunks)
- src/groups/groups.service.ts (20 hunks)
- src/questions/questions.prisma (4 hunks)
- src/questions/questions.service.ts (23 hunks)
- src/topics/topics.prisma (2 hunks)
- src/topics/topics.service.ts (3 hunks)
- src/users/users.prisma (3 hunks)
- src/users/users.service.ts (21 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- prisma/migrations/20240414154153_deprecate_answer_attitude/migration.sql
- src/common/prisma/prisma.module.ts
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- .github/workflows/test-coverage.yml
- prisma/schema.prisma
- src/answer/answer.prisma
- src/comments/comment.prisma
- src/groups/groups.prisma
- src/questions/questions.prisma
- src/topics/topics.prisma
- src/users/users.prisma
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/comments/comment.service.ts
[warning] 38-38: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L38
Added line #L38 was not covered by tests
[warning] 102-102: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L102
Added line #L102 was not covered by tests
[warning] 164-164: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L164
Added line #L164 was not covered by tests
[warning] 181-182: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L181-L182
Added lines #L181 - L182 were not covered by tests
[warning] 195-195: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L195
Added line #L195 was not covered by tests
[warning] 229-229: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L229
Added line #L229 was not covered by tests
[warning] 250-250: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L250
Added line #L250 was not covered by testssrc/answer/answer.service.ts
[warning] 307-307: src/answer/answer.service.ts#L307
Added line #L307 was not covered by tests
[warning] 379-379: src/answer/answer.service.ts#L379
Added line #L379 was not covered by tests
[warning] 572-572: src/answer/answer.service.ts#L572
Added line #L572 was not covered by testssrc/groups/groups.service.ts
[warning] 85-85: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L85
Added line #L85 was not covered by tests
[warning] 174-174: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L174
Added line #L174 was not covered by tests
[warning] 372-372: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L372
Added line #L372 was not covered by tests
[warning] 385-385: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L385
Added line #L385 was not covered by tests
[warning] 609-609: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L609
Added line #L609 was not covered by tests
[warning] 663-663: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L663
Added line #L663 was not covered by tests
[warning] 673-673: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L673
Added line #L673 was not covered by tests
[warning] 683-683: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L683
Added line #L683 was not covered by tests
[warning] 715-715: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L715
Added line #L715 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (22)
src/auth/session.prisma (1)
Line range hint
1-12: The model definitions forsessionandsession_refresh_logare clear and correctly use Prisma schema syntax.src/common/prisma/soft-delete.decorator.ts (1)
10-28: The implementation of theUseSoftDeletedecorator is correct and follows best practices for extending PrismaClient with custom functionality.src/common/prisma/prisma.service.ts (1)
13-59: Excellent integration of theUseSoftDeletedecorator withinPrismaService. The structure and annotations are correctly implemented to support soft delete functionality across multiple models.prisma/migrations/20240618022355_refactor_remove_typeorm/migration.sql (1)
15-32: The migration script correctly handles changes touser_agentfields and introduces new enum types for log tables. Ensure that there is no existing data that would be adversely affected by these changes, particularly the removal of columns and changes in column types.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing data that might be affected by the migration changes. # Check for existing data in user_register_log and user_reset_password_log echo "Checking for existing data in affected tables..." psql -c "SELECT count(*) FROM user_register_log WHERE type IS NOT NULL;" psql -c "SELECT count(*) FROM user_reset_password_log WHERE type IS NOT NULL;"src/topics/topics.service.ts (3)
131-137: The methodisTopicNameExistscorrectly checks for the existence of a topic name using the Prisma count method. This is a simple yet effective way to prevent duplicate topics.
28-45: Ensure that the method to check for existing topic names (isTopicNameExists) is covered by unit tests, especially since it directly affects the behavior ofaddTopic.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify coverage for the isTopicNameExists method in TopicsService. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class TopicsService { $$$ isTopicNameExists($_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'
96-103: The methodfindTopicRecordOrThrowis crucial for fetching topics safely. Ensure this method is covered by unit tests to verify its behavior when a topic is not found.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify coverage for the findTopicRecordOrThrow method in TopicsService. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class TopicsService { $$$ findTopicRecordOrThrow($_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'src/comments/comment.service.ts (4)
72-79: The methodisCommentExistsis implemented correctly using the Prisma count method to check for comment existence.
83-97: ThecreateCommentmethod correctly ensures the existence of the commentable entity before creating a comment. This is a good practice to maintain data integrity.
63-71: The methodfindCommentOrThrowperforms its intended functionality well, but ensure it is covered by unit tests since it's critical for fetching comments safely.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify coverage for the findCommentOrThrow method in CommentsService. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class CommentsService { $$$ findCommentOrThrow($_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'
101-115: ThedeleteCommentmethod handles the deletion of a comment and logs the operation. Ensure this method is covered by tests to check its behavior when the comment does not exist.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify coverage for the deleteComment method in CommentsService. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class CommentsService { $$$ deleteComment($_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 102-102: src/comments/comment.service.ts#L102
Added line #L102 was not covered by testssrc/answer/answer.service.ts (4)
537-541: The methodisAnswerExistsis crucial for checking the existence of an answer in the database. It is implemented correctly using the Prisma count method.
63-71: The methodcreateAnswerchecks for existing answers before creating a new one, which is a good practice to avoid duplicates. Ensure this method is covered by tests, especially since it involves conditional logic.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify coverage for the createAnswer method in AnswerService. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class AnswerService { $$$ createAnswer($_, $_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'
Line range hint
159-202: The methodgetUserAnsweredAnswersAcrossQuestionsproperly implements pagination for user-specific answers. Consider adding unit tests to ensure the pagination works correctly under different conditions.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify coverage for the getUserAnsweredAnswersAcrossQuestions method in AnswerService. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class AnswerService { $$$ getUserAnsweredAnswersAcrossQuestions($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'
392-397: The methodgetFavoriteAnswershandles pagination and filtering for favorite answers. Ensure this method is covered by tests to verify the filtering and pagination logic.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify coverage for the getFavoriteAnswers method in AnswerService. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'class AnswerService { $$$ getFavoriteAnswers($_, $_, $_, $_, $_, $_) { $$$ } $$$ }'src/groups/groups.service.ts (4)
372-372: The line fetching the default avatar ID is not covered by tests. It's crucial to ensure that the fallback mechanism for avatar IDs works as expected.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the coverage for the line fetching the default avatar ID. # Test: Search for tests covering this scenario. Expect: At least one test case covering this fallback mechanism. rg --type python $'getDefaultAvatarId'Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 372-372: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L372
Added line #L372 was not covered by tests
385-385: The methodgetGroupProfileis not covered by tests. This method is crucial for fetching profile information of a group, and should be tested to ensure data integrity and error handling.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for tests covering `getGroupProfile` method. # Test: Search for tests involving this method. Expect: At least one test case covering various scenarios like existing and non-existing groups. rg --type python $'getGroupProfile'Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 385-385: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L385
Added line #L385 was not covered by tests
609-609: This line, which throwsUserIdNotFoundError, is not covered by tests. It's important to test error handling for cases where a user ID does not exist.#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure there are tests covering the scenario where `UserIdNotFoundError` is thrown. # Test: Search for tests that handle this exception. Expect: At least one test case covering this error scenario. rg --type python $'UserIdNotFoundError'Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 609-609: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L609
Added line #L609 was not covered by tests
663-663: The method call that fetches the reference relationship for a group question is not covered by tests. This is a critical part of pagination logic and should be thoroughly tested.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for tests covering the reference relationship fetch in group questions. # Test: Search for tests covering this method call. Expect: At least one test case covering this part of the pagination logic. rg --type python $'groupQuestionRelationship.findFirst'Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 663-663: src/groups/groups.service.ts#L663
Added line #L663 was not covered by testssrc/users/users.service.ts (2)
Line range hint
125-125: Validate the addition of user profile error handling.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there's proper error handling when the user profile is not found in `findUserRecordAndProfileRecordOrThrow`. # Test: Search for usage of the method and check for exception handling. rg --type ts "findUserRecordAndProfileRecordOrThrow"
Line range hint
417-417: Check the implementation of the login process.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the security of the password comparison in the login process. # Test: Ensure bcrypt's compareSync is used correctly and securely. rg --type ts "bcrypt.compareSync"src/questions/questions.service.ts (1)
208-215: Optimize the query for checking if a user follows a question.
[PERFORMANCE]
Consider usingexistsinstead ofcountfor existence checks, as it can be more performance-efficient in many database systems.- return ((await this.prismaService.questionFollowerRelation.count({ where: { followerId: userId, questionId, } })) > 0); + return await this.prismaService.questionFollowerRelation.findFirst({ where: { followerId: userId, questionId, }, select: { id: true }, }) !== null;This change uses
findFirstwith a select clause that fetches only theid, which is typically faster than counting entries, especially for large datasets.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/questions/questions.service.ts (1)
78-78: Consider using dependency injection forPrismaClientto enhance modularity and testability.It's generally a good practice to inject dependencies rather than accessing them directly. This aids in better unit testing and decoupling of components.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/questions/questions.service.ts (23 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
src/questions/questions.service.ts
[error] 59-59: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 62-62: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 64-64: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 66-66: Decorators are not valid here. (parse)
Decorators are only valid on class declarations, class expressions, and class methods.
You can enable parameter decorators by setting theunsafeParameterDecoratorsEnabledoption totruein your configuration file.
[error] 659-697: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 730-775: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 820-820: This default parameter should follow the last required parameter or should be a required parameter. (lint/style/useDefaultParameterLast)
The last required parameter is here:
A default parameter that precedes a required parameter cannot be omitted at call site.
Unsafe fix: Turn the parameter into a required parameter.
[error] 859-894: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
[error] 899-899: This default parameter should follow the last required parameter or should be a required parameter. (lint/style/useDefaultParameterLast)
The last required parameter is here:
A default parameter that precedes a required parameter cannot be omitted at call site.
Unsafe fix: Turn the parameter into a required parameter.
[error] 1137-1174: This else clause can be omitted because previous branches break early. (lint/style/noUselessElse)
Unsafe fix: Omit the else clause.
Additional comments not posted (4)
src/questions/questions.service.ts (4)
431-442: The logging of search operations could include more context, such as the execution time in a more readable format.
[REFACTOR_SUGGESTion]- duration: (Date.now() - timeBegin) / 1000, + duration: `${(Date.now() - timeBegin) / 1000} seconds`,This change makes the log entries easier to understand at a glance by explicitly mentioning the units.
10-17: Please ensure that the imports are organized and unused imports are removed if any.Verification successful
All imported entities in
src/questions/questions.service.tsare used within the file. Therefore, there are no unused imports that need to be removed.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are unused imports in the file. # Test: Search for unused imports in `questions.service.ts`. rg --type python -e "import" -C 5 src/questions/questions.service.tsLength of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all import statements in the TypeScript file. rg --type ts '^import' src/questions/questions.service.tsLength of output: 1311
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if each imported entity is used within the file. # List of all imported entities imports=( "Inject" "Injectable" "Logger" "forwardRef" "ElasticsearchService" "AnswerNotFoundError" "AnswerService" "AttitudeStateDto" "AttitudeService" "PageDto" "PageHelper" "SortPattern" "PrismaService" "GroupsService" "TopicDto" "TopicNotFoundError" "TopicsService" "UserDto" "UserIdNotFoundError" "UsersService" "QuestionInvitationDto" "QuestionDto" "QuestionElasticsearchDocument" ) # Check usage of each import for import in "${imports[@]}"; do echo "Checking usage of: $import" rg "$import" src/questions/questions.service.ts doneLength of output: 9596
151-175: This transaction block should ensure that all operations are necessary and properly handled.Verification successful
The provided code snippet shows the transaction block in the
addQuestionmethod, ensuring that the creation of a question and the addition of its topics are handled within a single transactional context. This approach is necessary to maintain data consistency and atomicity.The transaction block appears to be properly handling all necessary operations, including the creation of the question and the addition of topics to the question. Each topic is added within the same transaction, ensuring that if any part of the process fails, the entire transaction will be rolled back, preventing partial data from being committed.
Given the gathered information, the transaction block seems to be correctly implemented and necessary for the operations it handles.
- The transaction ensures atomicity and consistency for the creation of questions and their associated topics.
- The
addTopicToQuestionmethod is called within the transaction, passing theprismaClientto maintain the transactional context.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the necessity and handling of operations within the transaction block in `addQuestion`. # Test: Review the transaction logic for potential improvements or issues. rg --type python -e "transaction" -C 20 src/questions/questions.service.tsLength of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the necessity and handling of operations within the transaction block in `addQuestion`. # Test: Review the transaction logic for potential improvements or issues. rg --type typescript -e "transaction" -C 20 src/questions/questions.service.tsLength of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the necessity and handling of operations within the transaction block in `addQuestion`. # Test: Review the transaction logic for potential improvements or issues. rg -e "transaction" -C 20 src/questions/questions.service.tsLength of output: 5390
80-95: Ensure that the business logic within the transaction is correct and that all necessary validations are performed before database operations.Verification successful
The search results indicate the
addTopicToQuestionmethod is defined insrc/questions/questions.service.tsand is used in several places within the same file and insrc/questions/questions.spec.ts. The method appears to have validations for checking the existence of the question, topic, and user before proceeding with database operations.Here are the key usages and tests found:
src/questions/questions.service.ts: The method is used within the same service file for adding topics to questions.src/questions/questions.spec.ts: There are multiple tests ensuring that the method throws appropriate errors when the question, topic, or user does not exist.These tests verify the following:
QuestionNotFoundErrorwhen the question does not exist.TopicNotFoundErrorwhen the topic does not exist.UserIdNotFoundErrorwhen the user does not exist.Given this information, the business logic and validations within the
addTopicToQuestionmethod appear to be correctly implemented and tested.
src/questions/questions.service.ts: Method definition and usage.src/questions/questions.spec.ts: Tests verifying error handling.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the business logic and validations in `addTopicToQuestion`. # Test: Search for the usage of `addTopicToQuestion` to ensure it's used correctly. rg --type python -e "addTopicToQuestion" -C 10 src/questions/questions.service.tsLength of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the business logic and validations in `addTopicToQuestion`. # Test: Search for the usage of `addTopicToQuestion` to ensure it's used correctly. rg --type typescript -e "addTopicToQuestion" -C 10Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the business logic and validations in `addTopicToQuestion`. # Test: Search for the usage of `addTopicToQuestion` to ensure it's used correctly. rg -t ts -e "addTopicToQuestion" -C 10Length of output: 7785
No description provided.