refactor: move ramstk_group to a package

[weibullguy]

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

Describe the purpose of this pull request.

To move the common database tables to sub-packages under commondb.

Describe how this was implemented.

Created group sub-package, moved ramstk_group files to new sub-package. Updated tests.

Describe any particular area(s) reviewers should focus on.

None

Provide any other pertinent information.

Parially implements #846

Pull Request Checklist

• Code Style

  • Code is following code style guidelines.

• Static Checks

  • Failing static checks are only applicable to code outside the scope of
    this PR.

• Tests

  • At least one test for all newly created functions/methods?

• Chores

  • Problem areas outside the scope of this PR have an # ISSUE: comment
    decorating the code block. These # ISSUE: comments are automatically
    converted to issues on successful merge. Alternatively, you can manually
    raise an issue for each problem area you identify.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

❌  Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 1.56%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	0.83 ⭐	0.94 ⭐	0.11 👎
Method Length	54.12 ⭐	60.67 ⭐	6.55 👎
Working memory	5.18 ⭐	5.35 ⭐	0.17 👎
Quality	81.87% ⭐	80.31% ⭐	-1.56% 👎

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	973	906	-67

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
src/ramstk/models/init.py	%	%	%
src/ramstk/models/commondb/init.py	%	%	%
src/ramstk/models/commondb/database.py	80.30% ⭐	80.31% ⭐	0.01% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
src/ramstk/models/commondb/database.py	RAMSTKCommonDB.do_load_site_info	1 ⭐	360 ⛔	7 🙂	57.30% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
src/ramstk/models/commondb/database.py	RAMSTKCommonDB.do_load_site_variables	0 ⭐	164 😞	6 ⭐	70.59% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #991 (b18b251) into master (668c814) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #991      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.87%   94.88%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         162      164       +2     
  Lines        5288     5300      +12     
  Branches      516      517       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         5017     5029      +12     
  Misses        234      234              
  Partials       37       37              

Flag	Coverage Δ
3.6	94.88% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
3.7	94.88% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
3.8	94.88% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/ramstk/models/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/__init__.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/database.py	100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/group/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/group/record.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/ramstk/models/commondb/group/table.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 668c814...b18b251. Read the comment docs.