-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expand Observable#debounce
and Flowable#debounce
javadoc
#6377
Expand Observable#debounce
and Flowable#debounce
javadoc
#6377
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The scheduler wording needs to be adapted to the particular overload.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #6377 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 98.25% 98.16% -0.09%
+ Complexity 6292 6286 -6
============================================
Files 673 673
Lines 45092 45092
Branches 6239 6239
============================================
- Hits 44306 44266 -40
- Misses 248 274 +26
- Partials 538 552 +14
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
bb96222
to
1abd83f
Compare
Thanks for the review. Done. |
015055f
to
fa8a161
Compare
Mention that if the processing of a task takes too long and a newer item arrives then the previous task will get disposed interrupting a long running work. Fixes: ReactiveX#6288
fa8a161
to
fe02fc2
Compare
Thanks, the wording for selector-based debounces is updated. |
Mention that if the processing of a task takes too long
and a newer item arrives then the previous task will
get disposed interrupting a long running work.
Fixes: #6288