Update global uncertainty module to work with MUQ 2

[mliu49]

Motivation or Problem

The global uncertainty module of RMG previously used MUQ 1, relying on a semi-functional conda binary which only worked on Linux. MUQ 1 has since been deprecated in favor of MUQ 2.

Instead of updating the MUQ 1 binary to work with Python 3, I instead chose to build a new MUQ 2 binary from scratch.

Description of Changes

This PR implements Python 3, RMG py3, and MUQ 2 transition changes in the rmgpy.tools.globaluncertainty module (renamed from rmgpy.tools.muq).

This also updates the related IPython notebook.

Note: This is currently based on #1735.

Testing

I have run a couple of examples and the IPython notebook, so everything appears to be working.

I have not yet done any benchmarks to see if the results are the same as before.

To Do

• Compile mac binaries and test on mac

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1738 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 7.55%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #1738      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    44.2%   44.2%   -0.01%     
=========================================
  Files          83      83              
  Lines       21533   21529       -4     
  Branches     5645    5644       -1     
=========================================
- Hits         9519    9517       -2     
+ Misses      10961   10945      -16     
- Partials     1053    1067      +14

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
rmgpy/rmg/input.py	42.64% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
rmgpy/rmg/main.py	21.62% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
rmgpy/tools/globaluncertainty.py	7.72% <7.72%> (ø)
rmgpy/data/statmech.py	42.2% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
rmgpy/rmg/pdep.py	12.21% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
arkane/kinetics.py	12.14% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
rmgpy/data/kinetics/family.py	49.06% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
rmgpy/statmech/ndTorsions.py	59.78% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
rmgpy/yml.py	15.71% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
arkane/sensitivity.py	10% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
... and 2 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c46befa...2d5332a. Read the comment docs.

[mjohnson541]

This looks mostly fine to me. Doesn't the documentation need updated as a result of the uncertainty option changes?

[amarkpayne]

A couple of minor things, but the notebook appears to work as promised, so I think this is mostly good to go. I also think that the documentation might need updating. In the future, we should also add some unit tests for the global uncertainty module

[amarkpayne]

Everything except the extraneous character in the docstring looks good. Rebase and I'll merge

[mliu49]

Rebased.

[amarkpayne]

Thanks for the PR @mliu49 !