Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(deploy): add mastodon worker template for deployment #554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

FrankLi123
Copy link
Contributor

@FrankLi123 FrankLi123 commented Oct 10, 2024

Summary

Add mastodon worker template to YAML files for automatic deployment

Checklist

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

@FrankLi123 FrankLi123 self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
@FrankLi123 FrankLi123 merged commit 9c7ae13 into worker-dev Oct 10, 2024
3 checks passed
@FrankLi123 FrankLi123 deleted the feat/add-mastodon-template-in-deploy branch October 10, 2024 07:00
kallydev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2024
…bjects (#431)

fix: include federated schema in decentralzied schema

fix: replace federated schema paths with decentralized

fix: fix lint errors

fix: remove Type field from config file

fix: set and apply the defaultStartTime value pulled from VSL

feat: initialize ActivityPub network client for monitoring service

fix: resolve the issue of missing module params in func fetchWorkerInfo

fix: fix lint error

fix: add nil check case to debug

fix: fix the typo in extracting mastodon endpoint

fix: add missing ActivityPub network souce cases

feat: support the processing of Worker Status for independent federated workers

fix: debug for missing mastodon worker status

fix: initialize mastodon worker status successfully

fix: add `index count` to mastodon worker status

fix: combine federated handles functions into one

feat(deploy): add mastodon worker template for deployment (#554)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants