Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

expose service port from marathon REST API #38

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2014
Merged

expose service port from marathon REST API #38

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2014

Conversation

rasputnik
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #37.

@rasputnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also just realised the main readme shows config that's no longer used, so I've cleaned that out
(happy to redo this as 2 PRs if you'd prefer).

@j1n6
Copy link
Contributor

j1n6 commented Oct 10, 2014

You can squash commits.

Sent from my iPhone

On 10 Oct 2014, at 21:07, Dick Davies notifications@github.com wrote:

Also just realised the main readme shows config that's no longer used, so I've cleaned that out
(happy to redo this as 2 PRs if you'd prefer).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@rasputnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done, sorry about that!

Not a Git expert

@j1n6
Copy link
Contributor

j1n6 commented Oct 10, 2014

Looks good. Thanks for the fmt correction.
Do you mind adding a usage comment in haproxy template? (in case other users have same similar requirement)

@rasputnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

do you want a full example template (haproxy-legacy.cfg.tmpl ?) or shall I just add a section to the existing template?

On 10 Oct 2014, at 21:43, Jing Dong notifications@github.com wrote:

Looks good. Thanks for the fmt correction.
Do you mind adding a usage comment in haproxy template? (in case other users have same similar requirement)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@j1n6
Copy link
Contributor

j1n6 commented Oct 10, 2014

I think adding a commented example or description in existing template is
good enough.
Make sure it's commented out so that the current default behaviour stays
the same.
Thanks!

On 10 October 2014 21:47, Dick Davies notifications@github.com wrote:

do you want a full example template (haproxy-legacy.cfg.tmpl ?) or shall I
just add a section to the existing template?

On 10 Oct 2014, at 21:43, Jing Dong notifications@github.com wrote:

Looks good. Thanks for the fmt correction.
Do you mind adding a usage comment in haproxy template? (in case other
users have same similar requirement)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38 (comment).

This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this
communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please
erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to

the wrong person. Thanks.

@rasputnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will do - in same PR, or a new one?

On 10 October 2014 21:55, Jing Dong notifications@github.com wrote:

I think adding a commented example or description in existing template is
good enough.
Make sure it's commented out so that the current default behaviour stays
the same.
Thanks!

On 10 October 2014 21:47, Dick Davies notifications@github.com wrote:

do you want a full example template (haproxy-legacy.cfg.tmpl ?) or shall
I
just add a section to the existing template?

On 10 Oct 2014, at 21:43, Jing Dong notifications@github.com wrote:

Looks good. Thanks for the fmt correction.
Do you mind adding a usage comment in haproxy template? (in case other
users have same similar requirement)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38 (comment).

This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this
communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please
erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone
to

the wrong person. Thanks.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38 (comment).

@j1n6
Copy link
Contributor

j1n6 commented Oct 10, 2014

same PR would be good :)
Btw, thanks for correcting the README, that was my bad not correcting it.

On 10 October 2014 22:06, Dick Davies notifications@github.com wrote:

Will do - in same PR, or a new one?

On 10 October 2014 21:55, Jing Dong notifications@github.com wrote:

I think adding a commented example or description in existing template
is
good enough.
Make sure it's commented out so that the current default behaviour stays
the same.
Thanks!

On 10 October 2014 21:47, Dick Davies notifications@github.com wrote:

do you want a full example template (haproxy-legacy.cfg.tmpl ?) or
shall
I
just add a section to the existing template?

On 10 Oct 2014, at 21:43, Jing Dong notifications@github.com
wrote:

Looks good. Thanks for the fmt correction.
Do you mind adding a usage comment in haproxy template? (in case
other
users have same similar requirement)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38 (comment).

This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this
communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please
erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has
gone
to

the wrong person. Thanks.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38 (comment).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38 (comment).

This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this
communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please
erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone to

the wrong person. Thanks.

@rasputnik
Copy link
Contributor Author

No problem - on its way.

On 10 October 2014 22:08, Jing Dong notifications@github.com wrote:

same PR would be good :)
Btw, thanks for correcting the README, that was my bad not correcting it.

On 10 October 2014 22:06, Dick Davies notifications@github.com wrote:

Will do - in same PR, or a new one?

On 10 October 2014 21:55, Jing Dong notifications@github.com wrote:

I think adding a commented example or description in existing template
is
good enough.
Make sure it's commented out so that the current default behaviour
stays
the same.
Thanks!

On 10 October 2014 21:47, Dick Davies notifications@github.com
wrote:

do you want a full example template (haproxy-legacy.cfg.tmpl ?) or
shall
I
just add a section to the existing template?

On 10 Oct 2014, at 21:43, Jing Dong notifications@github.com
wrote:

Looks good. Thanks for the fmt correction.
Do you mind adding a usage comment in haproxy template? (in case
other
users have same similar requirement)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
https://github.com/QubitProducts/bamboo/pull/38#issuecomment-58714087>.

This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this
communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else,
please
erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has
gone
to

the wrong person. Thanks.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38 (comment).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38 (comment).

This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this
communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please
erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it has gone
to

the wrong person. Thanks.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38 (comment).

j1n6 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2014
expose service port from marathon REST API
@j1n6 j1n6 merged commit 13802ef into QubitProducts:master Oct 10, 2014
@j1n6
Copy link
Contributor

j1n6 commented Oct 10, 2014

@rasputnik Thanks for contributing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

serviceports aren't available in templates
2 participants