Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add filters to /job and /program #1466

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

akihikokuroda
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary

fix #1456

Details and comments

@IceKhan13
Copy link
Member

Looks good! I'll try to run test it Monday for final approval :) Thanks Aki!

Copy link
Member

@Tansito Tansito left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see the logic fine @akihikokuroda but I would like to propose a change in the logic as I was mentioning here: #1456 (comment)

Instead to use catalog & serverless I would use user & provider as Iskandar proposed. The reason behind this is that If other client would like to retrieve user or partner would need to use catalog or serverless what probably it has not much sense.

Apart from that I see everything ok 👍

@akihikokuroda
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Tansito The filter values are used (sent) by the current qiskit_ibm_catalog side. So they must be these values until the catalog client is changed. They are not visible from the users so we can create a refactor PR later and fix both client and gateway at the same time.

@Tansito
Copy link
Member

Tansito commented Aug 23, 2024

Ooooh, ok, understood I didn't know that the catalog was already with those values.

@Tansito
Copy link
Member

Tansito commented Aug 26, 2024

Don't wait for my approval to merge it @akihikokuroda , what I saw I saw it ok and if one of us approves it it's more than enough 👍

@akihikokuroda akihikokuroda merged commit 48ac9dd into Qiskit:main Aug 26, 2024
10 checks passed
@akihikokuroda akihikokuroda deleted the addfilters branch August 26, 2024 14:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Gateway: implement sets of filter to return function by specific criteria
3 participants