Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(docs): Message Content Intent in Migration Guide #1583

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Aug 22, 2022
Merged

feat(docs): Message Content Intent in Migration Guide #1583

merged 7 commits into from
Aug 22, 2022

Conversation

JustaSqu1d
Copy link
Member

Summary

This introduces intents in the migration guide as it is also an important change.

Preview

Information

  • This PR fixes an issue.
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed).
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, typehinting, examples, ...).

Checklist

  • I have searched the open pull requests for duplicates.
  • If code changes were made then they have been tested.
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • If type: ignore comments were used, a comment is also left explaining why.

@Dorukyum
Copy link
Member

Are we sure intents default to Intents.none()?

pycord/discord/state.py

Lines 207 to 209 in 966f560

intents = options.get("intents", None)
if intents is None:
intents = Intents.default()

@JustaSqu1d
Copy link
Member Author

I was under the impression that it was None. I will say that Message Content is now also a Privileged intent, then.

@JustaSqu1d JustaSqu1d changed the title feat(docs): Intents in Migration Guide feat(docs): Message Content Intent in Migration Guide Aug 21, 2022
docs/migrating_to_v2.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Dorukyum <53639936+Dorukyum@users.noreply.github.com>
@BobDotCom BobDotCom merged commit 31d1deb into Pycord-Development:master Aug 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants