You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
this is more a proposal of increment than a issue.
I am working on a project where I have to access different buckets from the same code.
In a case like this it can be a little annoying the need to build an S3FS instance for every bucket:
myfs1 = fs.open_fs('s3://bucket1') f1 = myfs1.open('/folder1/file1') myfs2 = fs.open_fs('s3://bucket2') f2 = myfs2.open('/folder2/file2') myfs3 = fs.open_fs('s3://bucket3') ...
It would be nice the possibility to set up the file system with an empty default bucket, treating the first folder in the path as bucket name.
myfs = fs.open_fs('s3://') f1 = myfs.open('/bucket1/folder1/file1') f2 = myfs.open('/bucket2/folder2/file2')