Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure deterministic in MixUp, CutMix, CutOut #7813
Ensure deterministic in MixUp, CutMix, CutOut #7813
Changes from 2 commits
ac157da
da12397
6bde514
fd14a41
1e0bd88
37f09dc
2246a2a
6f65042
7090065
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello, I'm a researcher currently working with CutMix and other similar method. My group and I noticed an inconsistent behavior in CutMix on the segmentation labels on our different machines. After some digging, we think it may come from this PR: before this change,
self.apply_on_labels(labels)
is used for the label, but the modified change useself.apply(labels_t)
which uses the same cropping mechanism as for the image.This PR does not mention the reason for this change, could you enlighten me please ?
Thank you in advance for your time.