Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

+ operator on a depset is forbidden #6

Closed
regisd opened this issue Nov 2, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

+ operator on a depset is forbidden #6

regisd opened this issue Nov 2, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@regisd
Copy link
Contributor

regisd commented Nov 2, 2019

With pandoc rule v0.2, I encounter:

ERROR: in _pandoc rule:

File "/private/var/tmp/_bazel_regisd/06f542c1a539b08f2925af301e3c7ab9/external/bazel_pandoc/pandoc.bzl", line 3, in _pandoc_impl
ctx.actions.run(<5 more arguments>)
File "/private/var/tmp/_bazel_regisd/06f542c1a539b08f2925af301e3c7ab9/external/bazel_pandoc/pandoc.bzl", line 15, in ctx.actions.run
toolchain.pandoc.files + ctx.files.src
+ operator on a depset is forbidden. See https://docs.bazel.build/versions/master/skylark/depsets.html for recommendations. Use --incompatible_depset_union=false to temporarily disable this check.

@regisd
Copy link
Contributor Author

regisd commented Nov 2, 2019

This is new with Bazel release 1.1.0

regisd added a commit to jflex-de/jflex that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2019
* Fix #570. Build broken on Cirrus by upgrade to Bazel v1.0
  * The `single_file` attribute has been replaced by `allow_single_file`.
    Use **bazel_rules** v4 which fixed this. jflex-de/bazel_rules#13
  * add `--incompatible_depset_union=false`
    bazel_pandoc ProdriveTechnologies/bazel-pandoc#6 needs to update for incompatible_depset_union bazelbuild/bazel#5817
  * Use ProdriveTechnologies/bazel-latex#26 because `run_lualatex.py` is not executable
  * In deps, use `https` rather than `http`
* Fix build broken on Travis due to upgrade to Xenial
  * Use openjdk11 because whatever I ask for, that's what I get.
  * Upgrade maven-compiler-plugin to 3.8.0 to fix _class file has wrong version 55.0, should be 53.0_
  * Fix maven-compiler-plugin config for ErrorProne
  * Fix config of maven-javadoc-plugin for newer JDK. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212233
  * In aggregated sources, update to JDK8 because Xenial doesn't support JDK7 anymore.
    Add manual dep on **javax-annotations.jar** because because JDK8 doesn't provide it anymore.
  * Remove the task that builds the docs because `\tightlist` is not known. #571
regisd pushed a commit to jflex-de/jflex that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2019
Author: Régis Décamps <regisd@google.com>
Date:   Tue Nov 5 11:16:01 2019 +0100

    Fix the build (#569)

    * Fix #570. Build broken on Cirrus by upgrade to Bazel v1.0
      * The `single_file` attribute has been replaced by `allow_single_file`.
        Use **bazel_rules** v4 which fixed this. jflex-de/bazel_rules#13
      * add `--incompatible_depset_union=false`
        bazel_pandoc ProdriveTechnologies/bazel-pandoc#6 needs to update for incompatible_depset_union bazelbuild/bazel#5817
      * Use ProdriveTechnologies/bazel-latex#26 because `run_lualatex.py` is not executable
      * In deps, use `https` rather than `http`
    * Fix build broken on Travis due to upgrade to Xenial
      * Use openjdk11 because whatever I ask for, that's what I get.
      * Upgrade maven-compiler-plugin to 3.8.0 to fix _class file has wrong version 55.0, should be 53.0_
      * Fix maven-compiler-plugin config for ErrorProne
      * Fix config of maven-javadoc-plugin for newer JDK. https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212233
      * In aggregated sources, update to JDK8 because Xenial doesn't support JDK7 anymore.
        Add manual dep on **javax-annotations.jar** because because JDK8 doesn't provide it anymore.
      * Remove the task that builds the docs because `\tightlist` is not known. #571

Updated from target/jflex-parent-1.8.0-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar
@patbro
Copy link
Member

patbro commented Nov 13, 2019

Resolved in PR #7

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants