-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Example names normalization #119
Comments
If there are no examples, we generate a placeholder in the form of I think we would need some way to normalize it (on-demand or as default behavior?). |
I think the placeholder format is more readable in the Markdown. However I wonder if this would present cleanly in MAML. If it does look good, I would vote for new example header styles. |
This issue been opened independently 3 times already, that really makes it the top request :) |
@vors The current observed behaviour of comment based help is to pad 26 * dash(-) either side of the Example nn. For single/double digit examples this results in a line 63/64 characters long. With an the same number of dashes each side of the text. Based on that we currently allow more text then just Example nn i.e. The other points is that comment based help capitalises the EXAMPLE NN words. For consistency with comment based help it makes sense to do the same. What do you think? Based on discussion from other duplicate issue, the intent is only to implement a change that will affect MAML output, and markdown editing of examples would remain unchanged. Happy to pick this one up. |
I think capitalization is not necessary, the dashes provides enough visual clue. We can revisit it later based on the feedback. Yes, please, go ahead! |
I am just getting started with the Module, and have noticed differences between the way my Markdown files are getting set.
One module has examples like this
and the other has them like this
Is there a way to control this that I am overlooking?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: