Add evalTermNoEmit and internal functions used by this function
#671
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Haven't actually had the time to benchmark this, but I've found another function and now I'm wondering what the difference is 😭 https://cardano-ledger.cardano.intersectmbo.org/cardano-ledger-core/Cardano-Ledger-Plutus-Language.html#v:evaluatePlutusRunnable |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is for @peter-mlabs to test if there are any notable performance difference between evaluating CEK with budgeting and trace logging vs. with everything turned off.
There will be some performance draw back for large scripts because is has to convert DeBruijn terms into named terms for evaluation and convert named terms back to DeBruijn to be re-integrated into Plutarch term.