[TRIGGER] Google Sheet - New Row Added (Polling Source) #15701
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThis pull request updates the package version of Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Timer as Polling Timer
participant Module as NewRowPollingModule
participant Sheets as GoogleSheetsAPI
participant Emitter as Event Emitter
Timer->>Module: Trigger polling interval
Module->>Sheets: Request spreadsheet data (using sheetID)
Sheets-->>Module: Return spreadsheet data
Module->>Emitter: Emit event if new row is detected
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/google_sheets/sources/new-row-added-polling/new-row-added-polling.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs ✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/google_sheets/sources/new-row-added-polling/new-row-added-polling.mjs (1)
6-13: Consider updating the version number.The source configuration looks good, but the version is set to "0.0.1". Since this is being added to version 0.8.0 of the package, consider aligning the component version.
- version: "0.0.1", + version: "0.8.0",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/google_sheets/package.json(1 hunks)components/google_sheets/sources/new-row-added-polling/new-row-added-polling.mjs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/google_sheets/sources/new-row-added-polling/new-row-added-polling.mjs (3)
1-4: LGTM! Dependencies are correctly imported.The module imports all necessary dependencies including Google Sheets API, common functionality, base methods, and platform constants.
14-40: LGTM! Props are well-defined with clear descriptions.The props configuration is comprehensive:
- Integrates with Google Sheets
- Uses database for state management
- Configures polling timer with default interval
- Includes watched drive and sheet ID selection
- Inherits common props
45-48:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify error handling in processSpreadsheet.
The run method looks concise, but we should verify error handling in the inherited
processSpreadsheetmethod.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for processSpreadsheet implementation ast-grep --pattern 'processSpreadsheet($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 56
I'll generate a new verification script to search for occurrences of
processSpreadsheet(in the repository, including context to check if there's any error handling (e.g., atry/catchblock) associated with it:The previous AST-grep search did not yield any output, which means we couldn’t locate a straightforward definition or implementation of
processSpreadsheet. This leaves us unable to confirm if proper error handling (such as a try/catch around its execution) exists.Action Required: Verify Error Handling in processSpreadsheet
- The
runmethod incomponents/google_sheets/sources/new-row-added-polling/new-row-added-polling.mjscallsthis.processSpreadsheet(spreadsheet)without its own error handling.- The search did not find a clear implementation of
processSpreadsheet. Please manually verify that the inheritedprocessSpreadsheetmethod includes appropriate error handling (like wrapping its logic in a try/catch block).Since our automated search didn’t conclusively locate the implementation or its error handling constructs, please double-check that the base or inherited method correctly handles potential errors.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the implementation or usage of processSpreadsheet with context for error handling rg -n -C 5 "processSpreadsheet\s*\(" .Length of output: 10714
Action Required: Validate Error Handling in processSpreadsheet
The
run()method incomponents/google_sheets/sources/new-row-added-polling/new-row-added-polling.mjsdelegates processing by simply callingthis.processSpreadsheet(spreadsheet). Our investigation across the codebase shows that implementations ofprocessSpreadsheetvary:
- In some modules (e.g.,
components/google_sheets/sources/common/new-updates.mjsandcomponents/google_sheets/sources/common/new-row-added.mjs), the method contains processing logic without explicit error handling (e.g., notry/catchblocks).- In
components/google_sheets/sources/common/http-based/base.mjs, the base implementation ofprocessSpreadsheetthrows an error ("processSpreadsheet is not implemented").This suggests that error handling is either omitted by design (with errors expected to propagate) or possibly an oversight. Please verify that this behavior is intentional. If swallowing or managing errors is required to avoid potential disruptions during spreadsheet processing, consider adding appropriate error handling (e.g., wrapping the call in a
try/catchblock either withinrunor inside overridingprocessSpreadsheetmethods).components/google_sheets/package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.The version update from 0.7.12 to 0.8.0 follows semantic versioning for adding new functionality (polling source) without breaking changes.
Resolves #15666
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores