Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adolfo/money 1950 remove actioncable from sdk #14937

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

adolfo-pd
Copy link
Contributor

@adolfo-pd adolfo-pd commented Dec 11, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Version 1.1.1 released with updates to the changelog and removal of deprecated asynchronous response handling.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of asynchronous operations by removing outdated response managers.
  • Documentation

    • Updated changelog to reflect changes and improvements across versions.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified request handling in various client classes by eliminating the asynchronous response manager.
  • Chores

    • Incremented version number in the package.json file.

Copy link

linear bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 11, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Dec 12, 2024 6:38pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 12, 2024 6:38pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Dec 12, 2024 6:38pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the update of the SDK to version 1.1.1, which includes the removal of deprecated asynchronous response handling code. Key files affected are the async.ts files for both browser and server contexts, which contained classes for managing asynchronous responses. The BrowserClient and BackendClient classes have also been modified to remove references to the now-deleted asynchronous response managers. Additionally, several methods in the BaseClient class have been refactored to simplify their implementation by eliminating asynchronous handling capabilities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/sdk/CHANGELOG.md Updated to version 1.1.1; removed deprecated asynchronous response handling code; included details of previous versions and improvements.
packages/sdk/package.json Version updated from 1.1.0 to 1.1.1; no other changes to functionality or dependencies.
packages/sdk/src/browser/async.ts Deleted file containing BrowserAsyncResponseManager class and its associated type definitions.
packages/sdk/src/browser/index.ts Removed asyncResponseManager property from BrowserClient class; constructor no longer initializes this property.
packages/sdk/src/server/async.ts Deleted file containing ServerAsyncResponseManager class and its associated type definitions.
packages/sdk/src/server/index.ts Removed asyncResponseManager property from BackendClient class; constructor no longer initializes this property.
packages/sdk/src/shared/async.ts Deleted file containing TypeScript definitions and AsyncResponseManager abstract class.
packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts Removed asyncResponseManager property from BaseClient class; several methods refactored to eliminate asynchronous handling capabilities.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, dependencies, tracked internally, pd-api

Suggested reviewers

  • jcortes

🐇 In the code where I once played,
Asynchronous paths have now been laid.
With clarity bright and structure anew,
The SDK hops forward, fresh as the dew!
No more the waits, just swift and clear,
A leap for the future, let’s give a cheer! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/sdk/CHANGELOG.md (2)

4-4: Fix typos in dates and wording

There are several typos that need to be corrected:

  • Line 4: "2024-12-011" should be "2024-12-01"
  • Line 8: "asynchoronous" should be "asynchronous"
  • Line 10: "2024-12-010" should be "2024-12-01"
-## [1.1.1] - 2024-12-011
+## [1.1.1] - 2024-12-01

-Remove deprecated asynchoronous response handling code.
+Remove deprecated asynchronous response handling code.

-## [1.1.0] - 2024-12-010
+## [1.1.0] - 2024-12-01

Also applies to: 8-8, 10-10


6-9: Enhance changelog entry with more details

The changelog entry could be more descriptive about the specific changes made. Based on the PR title and AI summary, consider adding details about:

  • The removal of ActionCable
  • Which async response handling code was deprecated
  • Any potential impact on existing implementations

Example enhancement:

 ### Changed

-Remove deprecated asynchoronous response handling code.
+Remove deprecated asynchronous response handling code:
+- Remove ActionCable dependency
+- Delete BrowserAsyncResponseManager and ServerAsyncResponseManager
+- Remove async response handling from BrowserClient and BackendClient
packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts (1)

Update JSDoc example to remove misleading await usage

The reloadComponentProps method is not async, but its JSDoc example incorrectly shows await usage. The only occurrence found is in the documentation example at packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts. Please update the JSDoc example to remove the await keyword to prevent confusion.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 986-990: Ensure callers handle the removal of async keyword in reloadComponentProps

The method reloadComponentProps is now synchronous. Please verify that all parts of the codebase that call this method have been updated accordingly to remove any unnecessary await statements.

Run the following script to find usages of await reloadComponentProps(:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any usages of 'await reloadComponentProps(' to ensure they are updated.

rg 'await\s+reloadComponentProps\('

Length of output: 37


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find all occurrences of reloadComponentProps to understand its usage
rg "reloadComponentProps" -A 2

# Also search for the function definition to verify if it was actually async before
ast-grep --pattern 'reloadComponentProps($_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 871


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search git history to see if this function was previously marked as async
git log -p | rg -A 5 -B 5 "async.*reloadComponentProps"

# Let's also check for any usage of this function with await in the entire codebase
# using a more flexible pattern that might catch different formatting
rg -i "await.*reloadComponentProps|reloadComponentProps.*await"

Length of output: 164

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 877596e and 040a7c4.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • packages/connect-react/examples/nextjs/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • packages/sdk/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/sdk/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/sdk/src/browser/async.ts (0 hunks)
  • packages/sdk/src/browser/index.ts (0 hunks)
  • packages/sdk/src/server/async.ts (0 hunks)
  • packages/sdk/src/server/index.ts (0 hunks)
  • packages/sdk/src/shared/async.ts (0 hunks)
  • packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts (4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
  • packages/sdk/src/browser/async.ts
  • packages/sdk/src/server/async.ts
  • packages/sdk/src/shared/async.ts
  • packages/sdk/src/browser/index.ts
  • packages/sdk/src/server/index.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/sdk/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/sdk/src/shared/index.ts (3)

1097-1099: Ensure callers handle the removal of async keyword in deployTrigger

deployTrigger has been converted from an asynchronous to a synchronous method. Ensure that any await statements used when calling this method are removed to maintain correct behavior.

Run the following script to find usages of await deployTrigger(:


930-932: Ensure callers handle the removal of async keyword in configureComponent

The method configureComponent has been changed from an asynchronous function to a synchronous one. Verify that all callers of this method have been updated to remove any unnecessary await statements, which could lead to unexpected behavior.

Run the following script to find usages of await configureComponent(:


1043-1045: Ensure callers handle the removal of async keyword in runAction

The method runAction has been updated to a synchronous function. Check that all callers have been updated to remove await where it's no longer necessary, preventing potential issues.

Run the following script to find usages of await runAction(:

@adolfo-pd adolfo-pd merged commit 647f48d into master Dec 12, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@adolfo-pd adolfo-pd deleted the adolfo/money-1950-remove-actioncable-from-sdk branch December 12, 2024 18:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants