Support for converting Qiskit Noise models

[obliviateandsurrender]

Context: Adds support for converting Qiskit noise models to PennyLane ones.

Description of the Change: Adds a from_qiskit_noise function that uses implementation in pennylane-qiskit plugin for executing the conversion.

Benefits: Qiskit noise models can be mapped to PL ones.

Possible Drawbacks: Multi-qubit errors would be a bit harder to track since PL only has single-qubit error channels (except qml.QubitChannel).

Related GitHub Issues: [sc-68046]

[github-actions]

Hello. You may have forgotten to update the changelog!
Please edit doc/releases/changelog-dev.md with:

• A one-to-two sentence description of the change. You may include a small working example for new features.
• A link back to this PR.
• Your name (or GitHub username) in the contributors section.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.65%. Comparing base (55058c7) to head (ca196ef).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5996      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.66%   99.65%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         430      430              
  Lines       41488    41210     -278     
==========================================
- Hits        41348    41069     -279     
- Misses        140      141       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[trbromley]

Thanks @obliviateandsurrender!

[austingmhuang]

Looks good @obliviateandsurrender. Just a comment about the confusing example lol, but otherwise it seems like the changes are pretty straightforward. No tests are necessary for this load_noise_model function?

[soranjh]

Thanks @obliviateandsurrender, please address my final minor points before merging. Also, please make sure that @trbromley and @isaacdevlugt approve the kwargs.

[isaacdevlugt]

Thanks @obliviateandsurrender! This looks really nice ⭐. Couple suggestions on docstring wording / explanation. Otherwise, looks great!

[isaacdevlugt]

[trbromley]

Thanks @obliviateandsurrender! This overall looks great. Once we've resolved my final question there will be no more blockers from me.