Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update LT docs #971

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions .github/CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@

### Improvements

* Update `lightning.tensor` python layer unit tests.
maliasadi marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
[(#971)](https://github.com/PennyLaneAI/pennylane-lightning/pull/971)

* Fix PTM stable-latest.
[(#961)](https://github.com/PennyLaneAI/pennylane-lightning/pull/961)

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -129,6 +132,9 @@

### Documentation

* Update `lightning.tensor` usage suggestions.
[(#971)](https://github.com/PennyLaneAI/pennylane-lightning/pull/971)

* Update ``lightning.tensor`` documentation to include all the new features added since pull request #756. The new features are: 1, Finite-shot measurements; 2. Expval-base quantities; 3. Support for ``qml.state()`` and ``qml.stateprep()``; 4. Support for all gates support via Matrix Product Operator (MPO).
[(#909)](https://github.com/PennyLaneAI/pennylane-lightning/pull/909)

Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions doc/lightning_tensor/device.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ Check out the :doc:`/lightning_tensor/installation` guide for more information.

.. seealso:: `DefaultTensor <https://docs.pennylane.ai/en/latest/code/api/pennylane.devices.default_tensor.DefaultTensor.html>`__ for a CPU only tensor network simulator device.

Note that it is recommended to create a ``lightning.tensor`` device for each quantum circuit simulation to ensure resources are correctly handled.

maliasadi marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Operations and observables support
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Expand Down
36 changes: 35 additions & 1 deletion tests/test_gates.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ def test_gate_unitary_correct(op, op_name):

if op_name == "QubitUnitary" and device_name == "lightning.tensor":
pytest.skip(
"Skipping QubitUnitary on lightning.tensor. It can't be decomposed into 1-wire or 2-wire gates"
"Skipping QubitUnitary on lightning.tensor. `lightning.tensor` device could be cleaned up like other state vector backends do as data is attached to the graph. One device for one circuit is recommended for `lightning.tensor`."
maliasadi marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
)

dev = qml.device(device_name, wires=wires)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -153,6 +153,40 @@ def output(input):
assert np.allclose(unitary, unitary_expected)


@pytest.mark.parametrize("op_name", ld.operations)
def test_gate_unitary_correct_lt(op, op_name):
"""Test if lightning device correctly applies gates by reconstructing the unitary matrix and
comparing to the expected version"""

if op_name in ("BasisState", "QubitStateVector", "StatePrep"):
pytest.skip("Skipping operation because it is a state preparation")
if op == None:
pytest.skip("Skipping operation.")

wires = len(op[2]["wires"])

if wires == 1 and device_name == "lightning.tensor":
pytest.skip("Skipping single wire device on lightning.tensor.")

unitary = np.zeros((2**wires, 2**wires), dtype=np.complex128)

for i, input in enumerate(itertools.product([0, 1], repeat=wires)):
dev = qml.device(device_name, wires=wires)

@qml.qnode(dev)
def output(input):
qml.BasisState(input, wires=range(wires))
op[0](*op[1], **op[2])
return qml.state()

out = output(np.array(input))
unitary[:, i] = out

unitary_expected = qml.matrix(op[0](*op[1], **op[2]))

assert np.allclose(unitary, unitary_expected)


@pytest.mark.parametrize("op_name", ld.operations)
def test_inverse_unitary_correct(op, op_name):
"""Test if lightning device correctly applies inverse gates by reconstructing the unitary matrix
Expand Down
Loading