Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support ethermint mode with features #359

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 22, 2022

Conversation

thomas-nguy
Copy link
Contributor

@thomas-nguy thomas-nguy commented Feb 9, 2022

  • update deep_space with ethermint feature
  • add a PrivateKey which switch to ethermint when ethermint feature is turn on
  • change default hd_path if ethermint feature turn on

To build with ethermint feature run :
cargo build --features ethermint

Copy link
Contributor

@yihuang yihuang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's the same patch as this one: crypto-org-chain#31, which is verified in cronos's integration tests.

@hannydevelop hannydevelop requested review from EricBolten and removed request for hannydevelop February 18, 2022 12:32
@jackzampolin
Copy link
Contributor

jackzampolin commented Feb 18, 2022

So why wouldn't we use IBC instead of gravity bridge? Also we have a separate deep space implementation that has diverged from upstream that would like to continue to use.

Copy link
Contributor

@EricBolten EricBolten left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Question regarding patching.

orchestrator/Cargo.toml Show resolved Hide resolved
- update deep_space with ethermint feature
- add a PrivateKey which switch to ethermint when ethermint feature is turn on
- change default hd_path if ethermint feature turn on
@thomas-nguy
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jackzampolin @EricBolten I have reverted the previous cargo.lock change and just updated with minimal changes. It should be more manageable to review

thanks @yihuang for the effort

@cbrit
Copy link
Member

cbrit commented Feb 22, 2022

So why wouldn't we use IBC instead of gravity bridge? Also we have a separate deep space implementation that has diverged from upstream that would like to continue to use.

@thomas-nguy wanted to make sure you saw this question from Jack! I don't think we want to move back to the deep_space in crates.io at this time.

@zmanian zmanian merged commit 9bf8d5d into PeggyJV:main Feb 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants