Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Vite to v6.0.11 and resolve dependency conflicts #3531

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

PD203
Copy link

@PD203 PD203 commented Feb 3, 2025

Upgraded Vite to v6.0.11 for better performance and security. Updated dependencies like Vitest and related plugins to ensure compatibility with Vite 6.x. Resolved peer dependency conflicts and verified compatibility with updated configurations.

Related Issues:
#3518

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores

    • Upgraded multiple core dependencies and build tools to enhance performance, security, and compatibility with modern standards.
    • Improved the development environment by aligning with the latest platform requirements.
  • Tests

    • Updated testing utilities to streamline and fortify the testing process.

These updates contribute to a more stable and efficient experience while maintaining robust infrastructure support.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several dependency versions in both the package-lock.json and package.json files. Notable changes include incremental upgrades for packages such as @vitejs/plugin-react, vite, multiple Babel packages, and several @esbuild packages. In the package.json, additional updates modify dependencies related to testing such as vitest and @vitest/coverage-istanbul, as well as related polyfills and configuration plugins.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
package-lock.json Upgraded versions for dependencies including:
- @vitejs/plugin-react: ^4.3.3^4.3.4
- vite: ^5.4.8^6.0.11
- Multiple Babel packages updated (e.g., @babel/core, @babel/traverse)
- @esbuild/* packages updated from 0.21.5 to 0.24.2 and node engine updated from >=12 to >=18
package.json Updated versions for dependencies and devDependencies including:
- @vitejs/plugin-react: ^4.3.3^4.3.4
- vite: ^5.4.8^6.0.11
- vite-plugin-node-polyfills: ^0.22.0^0.23.0
- vite-tsconfig-paths: ^5.1.3^5.1.4
- Added/updated testing-related packages (vitest, @vitest/coverage-istanbul, vite-plugin-svgr)
- Adjusted @testing-library/dom dependency

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

test, ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes
  • varshith257
  • GlenDsza

Poem

Hop-hop, I’m a rabbit light on my feet,
Dancing on versions so crisp and neat.
Dependency carrots upgraded with glee,
From Vite to Babel, as fresh as can be.
I nibble on code, with a joyful beat! 🥕🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b3f21a5 and 476afcc.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • on (1 hunks)
  • package.json (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
package.json

[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.

on

[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.


[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.

🔇 Additional comments (6)
package.json (3)

69-69: Verify Vite v6 migration steps.

The upgrade from Vite v5 to v6 is a major version bump that may require following specific migration steps.

Run the following script to check for breaking changes and migration guide:

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.


73-73: Verify Vitest configuration and test scripts.

The addition of Vitest and related test scripts suggests a shift in testing strategy. Ensure that:

  1. Test configuration is properly set up
  2. Existing tests are compatible with Vitest
  3. Coverage reporting is configured correctly

Run the following script to verify the Vitest setup:

Also applies to: 80-82

✅ Verification successful

Vitest setup verified.

  • The presence of vitest.config.ts confirms that the test configuration is in place.
  • Multiple test files properly import Vitest, ensuring compatibility.
  • No standalone coverage configuration files were found—this indicates that coverage reporting is likely managed via the Vitest configuration (or defaults), which is acceptable unless project-specific adjustments are needed.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Vitest configuration and test files.

# Test: Search for Vitest configuration files
fd -t f "vitest.config"

# Test: Check test file patterns
rg -l "^import.*vitest" -g "*.test.*"
rg -l "^import.*vitest" -g "*.spec.*"

# Test: Verify coverage configuration
fd -t f "coverage" --exec cat {} \; 2>/dev/null

Length of output: 10187

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.


27-27: Verify compatibility between updated dependencies.

Several Vite-related packages have been updated. Ensure that all versions are compatible:

  • @vitejs/plugin-react ^4.3.4
  • vite-plugin-node-polyfills ^0.23.0
  • vite-tsconfig-paths ^5.1.4
  • vite-plugin-svgr ^4.3.0

Run the following script to check for peer dependency conflicts:

Also applies to: 69-74, 141-141, 161-161

✅ Verification successful

Compatibility Verified for Updated Vite Dependencies

  • The npm install check did not report any peer dependency warnings related to the Vite packages (@vitejs/plugin-react, vite-plugin-node-polyfills, vite-tsconfig-paths, and vite-plugin-svgr).
  • The only warnings pertain to rc-color-picker and its requirement on React and React-DOM 16.x, which is independent of the Vite dependency updates.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for peer dependency conflicts.

# Test: Install dependencies in a temporary directory and check for warnings
npm install --package-lock-only 2>&1 | grep -i "peer" || true

Length of output: 474

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.

on (3)

6-22: Verify peer dependency compatibility.

Check if the updated packages have compatible peer dependencies, especially for React-related packages.

Run this script to check peer dependencies:

✅ Verification successful

Peer dependencies are compatible.

  • The peer dependency for @vitejs/plugin-react@4.3.4 requires vite versions ^4.2.0 || ^5.0.0 || ^6.0.0, and the updated vite@6.0.11 satisfies this range.
  • The absence of warnings from npm ls confirms no conflicts.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check peer dependencies compatibility

# Get package.json content
echo "Checking peer dependencies..."
npm info @vitejs/plugin-react@4.3.4 peerDependencies
npm info vite@6.0.11 peerDependencies

# Check for any peer dependency warnings in the project
npm ls @vitejs/plugin-react vite

Length of output: 526

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.


[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.


231-232: Update Node.js version requirement in CI/CD.

The esbuild upgrade requires Node.js >=18, up from >=12. Ensure your CI/CD pipelines and development environments meet this requirement.

Run this script to check the Node.js version in CI/CD configuration:

Also applies to: 407-408

✅ Verification successful

CI/CD Node Version Requirements are Updated in the Configurations

  • GitHub workflows (e.g., in .github/workflows/push.yml, .github/workflows/push-deploy-website.yml, and .github/workflows/pull-request.yml) now specify Node.js versions like 22.x and 20.x, which satisfy the updated requirement (>=18).
  • Both updated entries (lines 231-232 and 407-408) are consistent with esbuild’s upgrade dependency.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Node.js version in CI/CD configuration

# Look for Node.js version specifications in common CI config locations
fd -e yml -e yaml -e json . .github/ .circleci/ | xargs rg -A 5 "node-version|nodejs|node"

Length of output: 5724

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.


[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.


18-19: Verify compatibility with Vite v6.0.11.

The upgrade from Vite v5 to v6 is a major version change that may introduce breaking changes.

Run this script to check for potential breaking changes and migration requirements:

✅ Verification successful

Compatibility with Vite v6 Verified
No issues were detected regarding Vite’s major version upgrade. The changelog output confirms the documented breaking changes and points to the migration guide, and our code (e.g. in the Vite config) does not appear to use any deprecated or removed APIs. Additionally, the Node engine upgrade to ≥18 aligns with Vite 6’s requirements. Overall, the upgrade from Vite v5.4.8 to v6.0.11 is compatible with our current usage.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Vite v6 migration guide and changelog for breaking changes

# Get Vite changelog
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vitejs/vite/main/packages/vite/CHANGELOG.md | grep -A 20 "6.0.0"

# Check if the project uses any deprecated features
rg -A 5 "define|import\.meta\.glob|ssr\.|optimizeDeps|build\.rollupOptions|server\.|preview\.|experimental\." 

Length of output: 71033

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.


[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.

on
Comment on lines +1 to +5
diff --git a/package-lock.json b/package-lock.json
index 3b7c816..3cc80d8 100644
--- a/package-lock.json
+++ b/package-lock.json
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Address pipeline failures.

The pipeline failures indicate unauthorized file changes. This could be due to:

  1. Missing write permissions in the GitHub Actions workflow
  2. Protected branch settings

Please verify:

  1. The GitHub Actions workflow has the necessary permissions
  2. The target branch's protection rules allow the changes
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.


[error] Unauthorized to change/delete the file.

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

  1. This has to be closed.
  2. The file named on needs to be removed
  3. Also this is against the main branch and not develop-postgres.

Please ensure the following:

  1. Commit your changes
  2. Get the latest upstream
    git checkout develop-postgres
    git fetch upstream
    git reset upstream/develop-postgres --hard
    git checkout -b my-issue
    
  3. Apply your changes from your original branch to the new my-issue branch
  4. Submit your PRs against our develop-postgres branch.

Please ask the slack channels for assistance.

Closing

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants