Code Coverage

[JaiPannu-IITI]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Improve Code Coverage in src/components/GroupChatDetails/GroupChatDetails.tsx
Related Issue : #3050

Snapshots/Videos:
Before

After

Summary

• All sections of the file are covered by tests.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Refined key documentation to enhance clarity and accuracy.
  • Removed outdated styling strategy details for more focused content.
• Tests
  • Introduced a test ensuring that group chat names display correctly, reinforcing component reliability.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several documentation files to reflect new line number details for function definitions and interface properties. It also removes a section detailing the CSS strategy from one doc. Additionally, a new test case has been added to the GroupChatDetails test suite to verify that the component renders the chat name correctly.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
docs/.../OrgList/functions/default.md docs/.../OrganizationModal/functions/default.md docs/.../OrganizationModal/interfaces/InterfaceOrganizationModalProps.md	Updated documentation to reflect new function definition line numbers (OrgList: 56→68 and OrganizationModal: 64→65) and adjusted interface property line numbers; removed CSS strategy explanations from OrgList docs.
src/components/GroupChatDetails/GroupChatDetails.spec.tsx	Added a new test case that verifies the chat name "Test Group" is rendered correctly.

Possibly related issues

• Improve Code Coverage in src/components/GroupChatDetails/GroupChatDetails.tsx #3050 – The new test case for GroupChatDetails contributes toward achieving full code coverage for that component.

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

• palisadoes

Poem

I'm a rabbit, hopping with glee,
Updates in docs as clear as can be.
Tests now check the chat's sweet name,
In our code garden, it's never the same.
Hoppy changes lead to a brighter day!
🐰✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 735869e and 315b726.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrgList/OrgList/functions/default.md (1 hunks)
• docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrgList/OrganizationModal/functions/default.md (1 hunks)
• docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrgList/OrganizationModal/interfaces/InterfaceOrganizationModalProps.md (7 hunks)
• src/components/GroupChatDetails/GroupChatDetails.spec.tsx (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)

• docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrgList/OrganizationModal/functions/default.md
• docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrgList/OrgList/functions/default.md
• docs/docs/auto-docs/screens/OrgList/OrganizationModal/interfaces/InterfaceOrganizationModalProps.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)

• GitHub Check: Test Application
• GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/components/GroupChatDetails/GroupChatDetails.spec.tsx (1)

599-616: ⚠️ Potential issue

Remove redundant test case.

This test case is redundant as it duplicates the functionality already covered by the 'renders correctly' test at the beginning of the file. Both tests verify the presence of 'Test Group' text.

To actually improve code coverage, consider adding tests for:

• Error scenarios in chat name updates
• Empty/invalid chat names
• Edge cases in user management
• Error handling in image upload

Let's analyze the current test coverage to identify gaps:

✅ Verification successful

Remove redundant test case from GroupChatDetails.spec.tsx.

The "renders chat name correctly" test is essentially duplicating the assertions already covered in the existing "renders correctly" test—both check for the presence of 'Test Group.' Removing this test will help streamline the suite and free you to add tests for distinct behaviors (for instance, error paths, invalid/empty chat names, or other edge cases) that actually improve coverage.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find untested code paths in GroupChatDetails component

# Search for conditional statements and error handlers in the component
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($$$) {
  $$$
} else {
  $$$
}'

# Search for try-catch blocks that might need error case testing
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
  $$$
} catch ($$$) {
  $$$
}'

# Search for event handlers that might need testing
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = ($$$) => {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 67302

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.65%. Comparing base (735869e) to head (315b726).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           develop-postgres    #3523   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage             88.65%   88.65%           
=================================================
  Files                   341      341           
  Lines                  8626     8626           
  Branches               1925     1925           
=================================================
  Hits                   7647     7647           
  Misses                  635      635           
  Partials                344      344           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[palisadoes]

The codecov report is showing no improvement

[JaiPannu-IITI]

Apologies for the unexpected issue. I will investigate and resolve it promptly.