Improve Code Coverage in src\components\RecurrenceOptions\CustomRecurrenceModal.tsx

[gitsofaryan]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Improve Code Coverage in src\components\RecurrenceOptions\CustomRecurrenceModal.tsx

Issue Number:

Fixes #3057

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

No

Summary

• All sections of the file are covered by tests.
• Improved code coverage for CustomRecurrenceModal.tsx.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

• I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
• I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
• I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

• I have written tests for all new changes/features
• I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
• I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests

  • Added a new test case for handling invalid or null "End date" values in recurrence settings
  • Improved test coverage for recurrence functionality

• Refactor

  • Simplified the logic for updating weekDays state in the recurrence modal

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new test case in the CustomRecurrence.spec.tsx file to validate handling of invalid or null date values in the recurrence settings. Additionally, a modification was made to the handleDayClick function in CustomRecurrenceModal.tsx, simplifying the logic for updating the weekDays state by removing the nullish coalescing operator.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/components/RecurrenceOptions/CustomRecurrence.spec.tsx	Added a new test case to check behavior with invalid/null end date values
src/components/RecurrenceOptions/CustomRecurrenceModal.tsx	Simplified weekDays state update logic in handleDayClick function

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Improve Code Coverage [#3057]	✅

Possibly related issues

• Improve Code Coverage in src/components/GroupChatDetails/GroupChatDetails.tsx #3050 (Improve Code Coverage in GroupChatDetails): Similar pattern of improving test coverage for a specific component

Suggested reviewers

• palisadoes

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's test of recurrence's might,
Checking dates with algorithmic delight,
Null values bounce, state remains tight,
Code coverage soars to a new height,
In the realm of components, all is right! 🗓️

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[github-actions]

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dab65dc and 032725e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• src/components/RecurrenceOptions/CustomRecurrence.spec.tsx (1 hunks)
• src/components/RecurrenceOptions/CustomRecurrenceModal.tsx (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

src/components/RecurrenceOptions/CustomRecurrenceModal.tsx

[error] Contains code coverage disable statement. Please remove it and add the appropriate tests.

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/components/RecurrenceOptions/CustomRecurrence.spec.tsx (1)

388-461: LGTM! Well-structured test case.

The test case effectively validates the handling of invalid/null date values in the recurrence settings. It follows the established testing patterns and improves code coverage.

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove the code coverage disable statement.

The comment //nweekDays can be empty appears to be a code coverage disable statement. Please remove it as indicated by the pipeline failure.

Apply this diff to fix the issue:

-        weekDays: [...weekDays, day], //nweekDays can be empty
+        weekDays: [...weekDays, day],

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	weekDays: [...weekDays, day], //nweekDays can be empty
	weekDays: [...weekDays, day],

🧰 Tools

🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow

[error] Contains code coverage disable statement. Please remove it and add the appropriate tests.