Improved code coverage #3460
Improved code coverage #3460
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on improving the testing coverage for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3460 +/- ##
===================================================
- Coverage 3.70% 1.90% -1.80%
===================================================
Files 315 316 +1
Lines 8293 8243 -50
Branches 1881 1876 -5
===================================================
- Hits 307 157 -150
- Misses 7948 8077 +129
+ Partials 38 9 -29
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx (1)
256-285: Add test cases for edge cases in organization data handling.While basic test coverage has been added, consider adding tests for:
- Empty organization data in different modes
- Error handling in different modes
- Organization data updates when userId changes
// Example test structure: test('updates organization data when userId changes', async () => { // Setup with initial userId // Verify initial organization data // Change userId // Verify organization data updates });🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 257-257: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L257
Added line #L257 was not covered by tests
[warning] 259-259: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L259
Added line #L259 was not covered by tests
[warning] 262-262: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L262
Added line #L262 was not covered by tests
[warning] 265-265: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L265
Added line #L265 was not covered by tests
[warning] 269-269: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L269
Added line #L269 was not covered by tests
[warning] 272-273: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L272-L273
Added lines #L272 - L273 were not covered by tests
[warning] 276-276: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L276
Added line #L276 was not covered by tests
[warning] 280-280: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L280
Added line #L280 was not covered by tests
[warning] 285-285: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L285
Added line #L285 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: IITI-tushar
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3400
File: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.spec.tsx:19-19
Timestamp: 2025-01-26T12:32:45.867Z
Learning: In React test files, avoid using React hooks outside component scope (including in static objects like mock data). Instead, initialize hooks inside describe blocks or extract the needed functionality without using hooks.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx
[warning] 257-257: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L257
Added line #L257 was not covered by tests
[warning] 259-259: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L259
Added line #L259 was not covered by tests
[warning] 262-262: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L262
Added line #L262 was not covered by tests
[warning] 265-265: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L265
Added line #L265 was not covered by tests
[warning] 269-269: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L269
Added line #L269 was not covered by tests
[warning] 272-273: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L272-L273
Added lines #L272 - L273 were not covered by tests
[warning] 276-276: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L276
Added line #L276 was not covered by tests
[warning] 280-280: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L280
Added line #L280 was not covered by tests
[warning] 285-285: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L285
Added line #L285 was not covered by tests
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx (2)
250-250: Good addition of userId to dependency array.Adding userId to the dependency array ensures the effect re-runs when the user changes, which is crucial for maintaining data consistency.
256-285: Improve test coverage for organization data handling.The organization data handling logic looks good, but static analysis indicates these lines aren't covered by tests.
Let's verify the test coverage:
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 257-257: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L257
Added line #L257 was not covered by tests
[warning] 259-259: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L259
Added line #L259 was not covered by tests
[warning] 262-262: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L262
Added line #L262 was not covered by tests
[warning] 265-265: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L265
Added line #L265 was not covered by tests
[warning] 269-269: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L269
Added line #L269 was not covered by tests
[warning] 272-273: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L272-L273
Added lines #L272 - L273 were not covered by tests
[warning] 276-276: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L276
Added line #L276 was not covered by tests
[warning] 280-280: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L280
Added line #L280 was not covered by tests
[warning] 285-285: src/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.tsx#L285
Added line #L285 was not covered by testssrc/screens/UserPortal/Organizations/Organizations.spec.tsx (1)
654-750: Well-structured test cases covering essential scenarios.The new test cases effectively cover:
- Pagination functionality
- Loading states
- Empty states
- Error handling
- Window resize behavior
This is a good improvement to the test coverage.
|
|
@palisadoes opened new pr please review it |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #3040
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Improvements