Fixes issue #3343 added styles from Loader.module.css to a global css file app.module.css #3396
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves refactoring the CSS for the Loader component by removing its specific CSS module and moving the spinner-related styles to the global Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
7275-7291: Consider using CSS custom properties for better maintainability.While the spinner size variants are well-defined, they could be more maintainable by using CSS custom properties.
Consider this refactor:
:root { + /* Spinner sizes */ + --spinner-xl-size: 6rem; + --spinner-xl-border: 0.5rem; + --spinner-lg-size: 4rem; + --spinner-lg-border: 0.3rem; + --spinner-sm-size: 2rem; + --spinner-sm-border: 0.2rem; } .spinnerXl { - width: 6rem; - height: 6rem; - border-width: 0.5rem; + width: var(--spinner-xl-size); + height: var(--spinner-xl-size); + border-width: var(--spinner-xl-border); } .spinnerLg { - height: 4rem; - width: 4rem; - border-width: 0.3rem; + height: var(--spinner-lg-size); + width: var(--spinner-lg-size); + border-width: var(--spinner-lg-border); } .spinnerSm { - height: 2rem; - width: 2rem; - border-width: 0.2rem; + height: var(--spinner-sm-size); + width: var(--spinner-sm-size); + border-width: var(--spinner-sm-border); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/Loader/Loader.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/Loader/Loader.tsx(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/Loader/Loader.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/Loader/Loader.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
7267-7273: LGTM! The spinner wrapper uses flexbox for proper centering.The implementation correctly centers the spinner both vertically and horizontally within the viewport.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring
Issue Number:
Fixes #3343
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Style