Improves Code Coverage In OrganizationTags.tsx #3031 #3314

arpit-chakraborty · 2025-01-18T16:32:21Z

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Improves the code Coverage in 📂 src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx

Issue Number:

Fixes #3031

Snapshots/Videos:

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

I have written tests for all new changes/features
I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Tests
- Enhanced test suite for OrganizationTags component
- Added comprehensive test scenarios covering:
  - Error handling during tag creation
  - Rendering of "no tags found" message
  - Edge cases with undefined user tags
  - Pagination scenarios
Bug Fixes
- Improved error handling in tag creation process
- Added fallback for handling undefined user tags list

coderabbitai · 2025-01-18T16:32:29Z

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on improving the code coverage and test suite for the OrganizationTags component. The changes involve adding new mock data and test cases to cover various scenarios, including error handling, empty states, and pagination edge cases. The modifications enhance the component's test coverage by introducing more comprehensive tests that verify the component's behavior under different conditions.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts`	- Added new mock constants: `MOCKS_ERROR_ERROR_TAG`, `MOCKS_EMPTY`, `MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR`, `MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES` - Renamed `MOCKS_ERROR` to `MOCKS_UNDEFINED_USER_TAGS` - Restructured mock data for better test coverage
`src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx`	- Enhanced error handling in `loadMoreUserTags` and `createTag` functions - Added fallback for `userTagsList` to prevent undefined errors - Simplified `InfiniteScroll` component props - Added `data-testid` attribute
`src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx`	- Imported new mock constants - Added new test cases for error scenarios - Expanded test coverage for various edge cases

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Improve Code Coverage [#3031]	✅
Create/Update Test Cases	✅
Remove Coverage Bypass Statements	❓	No explicit removal of coverage bypass statements observed

Possibly related PRs

Feat : Write Unittests for src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx #2393: Similar testing improvements in user portal components
Unittests for src/components/UserPortal/UserSidebar/UserSidebar.tsx #2396: Unit tests for UserSidebar component
Improve Code Coverage in src/screens/OrgSettings/OrgSetting.tsx #3091: Improving code coverage in OrgSettings component

Suggested Labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested Reviewers

palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Hopping through code with glee,
Tests now cover every tree!
Mocks and cases, edge and wide,
No bug shall silently hide!
Coverage complete, our rabbit's delight! 🧪

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df11029 and cc67bcb.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (3 hunks)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (4 hunks)
src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (16 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Learnings (3)

src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (2)

Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2398
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx:184-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.655Z
Learning: In the `talawa-admin` project, it's acceptable for test cases in `src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.test.tsx` to test multiple behaviors within a single test function without needing to split them into smaller, focused tests.

Learnt from: arpit-chakraborty
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3158
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts:384-524
Timestamp: 2025-01-15T05:39:30.480Z
Learning: In OrganizationTagsMocks.ts, MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR and MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES are designed to test UI handling of edge cases where pagination data is inconsistent (e.g., hasNextPage is true but endCursor is null, or next page returns undefined data).

src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (3)

Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2387
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx:470-498
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.655Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTag.tsx`, the `DataGrid` component uses infinite scroll via `react-infinite-scroll`, and page-based pagination provided by `DataGrid` is not used.

Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2387
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx:350-376
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:41:04.350Z
Learning: In the `src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx` file, the `OrganizationTags` component uses chunk size with the `InfiniteScroll` component and an outer parent div for handling data loading and scrolling.

Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2398
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx:372-415
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.655Z
Learning: Adding an error boundary for the infinite scroll and DataGrid components would be required across all screens and is planned for later.

src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (2)

Learnt from: arpit-chakraborty
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3158
File: src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts:384-524
Timestamp: 2025-01-15T05:39:30.480Z
Learning: In OrganizationTagsMocks.ts, MOCKS_NULL_END_CURSOR and MOCKS_NO_MORE_PAGES are designed to test UI handling of edge cases where pagination data is inconsistent (e.g., hasNextPage is true but endCursor is null, or next page returns undefined data).

Learnt from: meetulr
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2355
File: src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts:187-269
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In `src/screens/ManageTag/ManageTagMocks.ts`, when mocking data for `USER_TAGS_ASSIGNED_MEMBERS` and `USER_TAGS_MEMBERS_TO_ASSIGN_TO`, it's acceptable for user IDs to overlap because the queries serve different purposes and the overlapping IDs can represent realistic scenarios in tests.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)

GitHub Check: Test Application
GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)

🔇 Additional comments (10)

src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.spec.tsx (4)

305-322: LGTM! Comprehensive error handling test case.

The test case properly verifies that the error message from GraphQL is displayed to the user when tag creation fails.

323-331: LGTM! Empty state handling test.

The test case correctly verifies the "no tags found" message rendering when there are no tags.

332-342: LGTM! Edge case handling test.

The test case properly verifies that the component gracefully handles undefined userTagsList.

343-360: LGTM! Thorough pagination edge case tests.

The test cases properly verify the component's behavior when:

endCursor is null but hasNextPage is true

No more pages are available

These tests ensure robust handling of pagination edge cases.

Also applies to: 361-378

src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx (3)

147-148: LGTM! Improved error handling.

Added explicit error handling for the case when tag creation fails but no error is thrown.

169-172: LGTM! Simplified null handling.

The fallback to an empty array when userTagsList is undefined is a clean solution.

363-363: LGTM! Enhanced testability.

Added data-testid attribute to InfiniteScroll component for better test coverage.

Also applies to: 371-371

src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTagsMocks.ts (3)

334-342: LGTM! Well-structured error mock.

The mock correctly simulates a GraphQL error during tag creation.

344-374: LGTM! Comprehensive empty state mock.

The mock properly represents an empty tags list with appropriate pageInfo.

391-475: LGTM! Thorough pagination edge case mocks.

The mocks effectively simulate:

Null endCursor scenario

No more pages scenario

These align with the retrieved learning about testing UI handling of inconsistent pagination data.

Also applies to: 477-531

Finishing Touches

📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

github-actions · 2025-01-18T16:32:44Z

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

comments in this PR or
our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

codecov · 2025-01-18T16:36:01Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.35%. Comparing base (2490b2e) to head (cc67bcb).
Report is 16 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3314       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage              8.56%   89.35%   +80.79%     
=====================================================
  Files                   309      335       +26     
  Lines                  7954     8654      +700     
  Branches               1763     1920      +157     
=====================================================
+ Hits                    681     7733     +7052     
+ Misses                 7196      665     -6531     
- Partials                 77      256      +179

Flag	Coverage Δ
combined	`89.91% <100.00%> (?)`
jest	`8.34% <0.00%> (?)`
vitest	`89.91% <100.00%> (?)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

arpit-chakraborty · 2025-01-18T16:49:19Z

The test is failling in a file that I did not change, can anyone please explain as to what might be causing this.

arpit-chakraborty · 2025-01-18T17:02:29Z

The test is not failling when I run on my system

palisadoes · 2025-01-18T17:11:09Z

Please merge your code with the latest upstream, commit and then push.

arpit-chakraborty · 2025-01-18T17:11:39Z

okk i will do that

palisadoes · 2025-01-18T20:46:15Z

Change the title of this PR so that it is more descriptive and searchable

arpit-chakraborty added 9 commits January 5, 2025 22:07

Code coverage improvement

3dcb824

Linting issue resolved

6d60b5b

Reduced the no of ignore comments by adding more tests

475aa4f

Reduce no of lines in OrganizationTagsMocks.ts

5f03d2c

Deleted MOCKS_EMPTY_USER_TAG

730805a

Added appropiate error message

82a24ef

Resolved Conflict

8df7e98

Resolving conflicting files

17396b3

Removed all ignore statements

cc67bcb

coderabbitai bot approved these changes Jan 18, 2025

View reviewed changes

arpit-chakraborty changed the title ~~Arpit chakraborty#3031~~ Improves Code Coverage In OrganizationTags.tsx #3031 Jan 19, 2025

arpit-chakraborty closed this Jan 19, 2025

arpit-chakraborty reopened this Jan 19, 2025

palisadoes approved these changes Jan 19, 2025

View reviewed changes

palisadoes merged commit a7149b9 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 19, 2025
33 of 34 checks passed

This was referenced Jan 20, 2025

deploy error solved, push-deploy-website.yml updated #3364

Merged

#3046 Improve Code Coverage in AddPeopleToTag.tsx #3411

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Improves Code Coverage In OrganizationTags.tsx #3031 #3314

Improves Code Coverage In OrganizationTags.tsx #3031 #3314

arpit-chakraborty commented Jan 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Jan 18, 2025

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

arpit-chakraborty commented Jan 18, 2025

arpit-chakraborty commented Jan 18, 2025

palisadoes commented Jan 18, 2025

arpit-chakraborty commented Jan 18, 2025

palisadoes commented Jan 18, 2025

Improves Code Coverage In OrganizationTags.tsx #3031 #3314

Improves Code Coverage In OrganizationTags.tsx #3031 #3314

Conversation

arpit-chakraborty commented Jan 18, 2025 • edited Loading

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

Test Coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2025 • edited Loading

Walkthrough

Changes

Assessment against linked issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested Labels

Suggested Reviewers

Poem

Finishing Touches

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Jan 18, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Testing Your Code

Reviewers

Reviewing Your Code

CONTRIBUTING.md

Other

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2025 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

arpit-chakraborty commented Jan 18, 2025

arpit-chakraborty commented Jan 18, 2025

palisadoes commented Jan 18, 2025

arpit-chakraborty commented Jan 18, 2025

palisadoes commented Jan 18, 2025

arpit-chakraborty commented Jan 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Jan 18, 2025 •

edited

Loading