Improve code coverage in src/components/Pagination/Pagination.tsx
#3246
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on improving the test coverage and removing code coverage ignore comments in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/components/Pagination/Pagination.spec.tsx (4)
21-21: Improve test description for clarity.Consider making the test description more specific about what aspects are being tested.
- it('should render all pagination buttons and invoke onPageChange for navigation', async () => { + it('should render navigation buttons and handle page changes correctly when clicked', async () => {
58-73: Consider extracting common test setup logic.The boundary tests have similar setup code. Consider creating a helper function to reduce duplication.
const renderPagination = (props = {}) => { return render( <BrowserRouter> <Provider store={store}> <Pagination {...defaultProps} {...props} /> </Provider> </BrowserRouter> ); };Also applies to: 100-118
76-98: Enhance RTL testing coverage.While the basic RTL testing is good, consider adding more RTL-specific assertions to verify the component's behavior thoroughly in RTL mode.
Consider adding:
- Verification of button order in RTL mode
- Testing of RTL-specific styles or layouts
- Checking aria attributes in RTL context
11-11: Consider adding tests for edge cases.While the current test coverage is good, consider adding tests for:
- Invalid prop values (negative page numbers, counts)
- Zero items scenario
- Custom rowsPerPage values
- Accessibility features (keyboard navigation)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/Pagination/Pagination.spec.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Pagination/Pagination.tsx(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/Pagination/Pagination.tsx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Pagination/Pagination.spec.tsx (2)
9-18: Well-structured test setup with comprehensive props!The test setup is clean and thorough with realistic pagination values that will help test various scenarios effectively.
11-119: Verify test coverage metrics.The test suite is comprehensive and should provide excellent coverage. To verify:
✅ Verification successful
Test coverage is comprehensive and complete ✓
The test suite thoroughly covers:
- All navigation handlers and their parameters
- Boundary conditions for button states
- RTL/LTR rendering scenarios
- Event handling and callbacks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check current test coverage for the Pagination component # Look for any remaining istanbul ignore comments rg "istanbul ignore" src/components/Pagination/ # Check if there are any untested code paths ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($_) { $$$ }' src/components/Pagination/Pagination.tsxLength of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, verify file locations fd Pagination # Then examine the component implementation fd Pagination.tsx -t f --exec cat {} # Finally, look for any untested handlers or edge cases ast-grep --pattern 'const $HANDLER = ($_) => { $$$ }' ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 11194
|
LGTM, Good work @hars-21 |
palisadoes
merged commit e3a2bdf
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
|
Thanks sir |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Improving Code coverage in
src/components/Pagination/Pagination.tsxIssue Number:
Fixes #3056
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No changes required.
Summary
Added test for all the changes made.
Achieved 100% code coverage.
All the test cases passed.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No, it only improves the test and its coverage.
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
All the test cases have passed with 100% code coverage
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Tests
Refactor