[Fixes] Code Coverage: Create tests for store.tsx

[SiddheshKukade]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Added Testcases for src/state/index.ts file

Issue Number:
#277

Fixes #277

Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes I have added a testfile

Summary
I have added a store.test.tsx file required for the issue #277 for Gsoc2022

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

SnapShots

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

[SiddheshKukade]

Please let me know if I can improve and also the state.text.tsx file is added on the 3rd commit the first 2 commits are from another pull request #296

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #299 (ffe1a20) into develop (b462cca) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #299   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    40.22%   40.22%           
========================================
  Files           45       45           
  Lines          711      711           
  Branches       149      149           
========================================
  Hits           286      286           
  Misses         410      410           
  Partials        15       15           

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

[palisadoes]

You have submitted a PR without the issue being assigned. I just assigned the issue and realized the PR was in the queue for some hours. Please follow the process. We need to make everyone have a chance to participate. If you do this in future, the PR will be closed.

[palisadoes]

Please get the coverage up to 100%. At that point the PR will be reviewed.

[SiddheshKukade]

You have submitted a PR without the issue being assigned. I just assigned the issue and realized the PR was in the queue for some hours. Please follow the process. We need to make everyone have a chance to participate. If you do this in the future, the PR will be closed.

I apologize, sir , this will not be repeated

[yasharth291]

there is no increase in the codebase so the pr makes no sense i guess

[SiddheshKukade]

there is no increase in the codebase so the pr makes no sense i guess

wait i am improving the code

[SiddheshKukade]

@palisadoes @yasharth291 I have a simple doubt
On my machine when I run

 yarn test --watchAll=false --coverage

I get the following coverage
100% coverage

But in this Pull request the CODECOV shows following]
40% coverage only

please correct me If I'm going wrong at something

[yasharth291]

we have re-run the codecov on this you can close this one and open it again

[SiddheshKukade]

ok @yasharth291 sir