fixed the eslint checker #2318
fixed the eslint checker #2318
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the functionality of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py (2)
41-44: Improved file reading with UTF-8 encodingThe changes in the file reading operation are beneficial:
- Specifying UTF-8 encoding ensures proper handling of different character encodings.
- The use of
bool()on the search result guarantees a boolean return value.These improvements enhance the robustness of the file reading operation.
Consider using
any()with a generator expression for a slight optimization:return any(eslint_disable_pattern.search(line) for line in file)This approach would stop reading the file as soon as a match is found, potentially improving performance for large files.
45-47: Improved error handling for file readingThe addition of exception handling is a good improvement:
- It prevents the script from crashing due to file access issues.
- The error message provides useful information for debugging.
Consider using a logging module instead of print for error reporting. This would allow for more flexible log management:
import logging # At the beginning of the script logging.basicConfig(level=logging.ERROR) # In the exception handler logging.error(f"Error reading file {file_path}: {e}")Also, consider raising a custom exception or returning a distinct value (e.g., None) instead of False for error cases. This would allow the calling function to distinguish between "no eslint-disable found" and "error occurred while checking".
package.json (1)
72-72: Approve change with suggestions for improvementThe modification to the
lint:checkscript successfully addresses the PR objective by adding a check foreslint-disablecomments. This change will help enforce better adherence to linting standards.However, I have two suggestions for improvement:
Consider using a more portable way to invoke Python, such as
node -e "require('child_process').spawn('python', ['.github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py'], {stdio: 'inherit'})". This ensures compatibility across different environments where Node.js is guaranteed to be present.Add a comment explaining the purpose of the added Python script, for example:
"lint:check": "eslint \"**/*.{ts,tsx}\" --max-warnings=0 && python .github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py # Check for eslint-disable comments".github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
59-59: Approve the addition of eslint_disable_check.py with suggestions for improvementThe addition of
eslint_disable_check.pyaddresses the PR objective of fixing the eslint checker to detecteslint-disablecomments. This is a good improvement to the workflow. However, I have a few suggestions:
Use double quotes around
${CHANGED_FILES}to prevent potential issues with globbing and word splitting:run: npx eslint "${CHANGED_FILES}" && python .github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.pyConsider running the Python script regardless of the ESLint result. This ensures that
eslint-disablecomments are caught even when there are other linting errors. You can achieve this by using;instead of&&:run: npx eslint "${CHANGED_FILES}"; python .github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
59-59: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:12: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
59-59: Alignment with PR objectives and potential redundancyThe changes in this file align well with the PR objectives of fixing the
eslint_disable_check.pyscript to detecteslint-disablecomments. The script is now executed as part of the linting process (line 59), which directly addresses the issue.However, I noticed that there's also a separate job "Check-ESlint-Disable" (lines 168-178) that runs the same script. While this provides an additional layer of checking, it might be redundant and could potentially slow down the overall workflow.
Suggestions:
- Consider consolidating these checks into a single execution, preferably in the linting step, to improve efficiency.
- If keeping both checks is intentional (e.g., for redundancy or different scopes), please add comments explaining the rationale to improve maintainability.
Also applies to: 168-178
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
59-59: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:12: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
59-59: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:12: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py (2)
39-40: Improved eslint-disable detection patternThe new regular expression pattern is a significant improvement:
- It covers all variations of eslint-disable statements, including "eslint-disable-next-line" and "eslint-disable-line".
- The use of
re.IGNORECASEensures case-insensitive matching, making the detection more robust.This change directly addresses the PR objective of improving detection of eslint-disable statements.
39-47: Summary: Significant improvements in eslint-disable detection and error handlingThe changes in this PR successfully address the main objectives:
- The new regex pattern significantly improves the detection of various forms of eslint-disable statements, including the previously missed cases.
- The addition of error handling makes the script more robust against file reading issues.
- The use of UTF-8 encoding ensures proper handling of different character sets.
These improvements enhance the script's ability to enforce linting standards and maintain code quality. The PR effectively resolves the issue described in #2257.
To ensure the changes work as expected, please run the following verification script:
This script will help verify that the changes correctly detect various eslint-disable patterns and that the script exits with an error code when such patterns are found.
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
Line range hint
223-231: Approve the addition of the Check-Target-Branch jobThe new "Check-Target-Branch" job is a valuable addition to the workflow. It enforces good branching practices by ensuring that all pull requests are targeted to the 'develop' branch. This helps maintain a clean and organized development workflow.
Key benefits:
- Prevents accidental merges into incorrect branches.
- Provides clear guidance to contributors by referencing PR_GUIDELINES.md in the error message.
- Runs independently, allowing for quick feedback without waiting for other checks.
This addition will help streamline the PR process and reduce potential mistakes.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
58-58: property "changed_files" is not defined in object type {changed-files: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}
(expression)
59-59: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:12: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint
[error] 57-57: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 60-60: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2318 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 97.54% 97.54%
========================================
Files 242 242
Lines 6888 6888
Branches 2015 2005 -10
========================================
Hits 6719 6719
Misses 157 157
Partials 12 12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
palisadoes
merged commit 4718e18
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bugfix
Issue Number:
Fixes #2257
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores