Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add charitable-giving-response recipe to cookbook #2002

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 18, 2018
Merged

Add charitable-giving-response recipe to cookbook #2002

merged 2 commits into from
May 18, 2018

Conversation

martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request adds a fourth advanced recipe to the Tax-Calculator Cookbook. The new recipe illustrates how to use the new quantity_response utility function (available in release 0.20.0) to estimate the response in charitable (cash) giving when earnings groups have different response elasticities.

There are no changes to Tax-Calculator, just a new Cookbook recipe.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 17, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #2002 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2002   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.92%   99.92%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines        3770     3770           
=======================================
  Hits         3767     3767           
  Misses          3        3

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3610517...a438253. Read the comment docs.

@martinholmer martinholmer merged commit 936ddaf into PSLmodels:master May 18, 2018
@martinholmer martinholmer deleted the add-recipe branch May 18, 2018 20:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants