Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify in tax-calculator/README.md difference between user and developer documentation #1355

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 9, 2017
Merged

Conversation

martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request differentiates the new user documentation from the long-established developer documentation.

This is a key goal for any open-source project according to Karl Fogel, Producing Open Source Software: How to Run a Successful Free Software Project, Second Edition.

@MattHJensen @feenberg @Amy-Xu @andersonfrailey @GoFroggyRun @zrisher

@MattHJensen
Copy link
Contributor

+1 This is great.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 9, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1355 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1355   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.64%   99.64%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines        2805     2805           
=======================================
  Hits         2795     2795           
  Misses         10       10

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ea0fa94...3b47e59. Read the comment docs.

@martinholmer martinholmer merged commit 005e6d3 into PSLmodels:master May 9, 2017
@martinholmer martinholmer deleted the dev-user-doc branch May 9, 2017 19:08
@MattHJensen MattHJensen mentioned this pull request May 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants