Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename policy parameters to more consistent #1051

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Nov 9, 2016
Merged

Rename policy parameters to more consistent #1051

merged 14 commits into from
Nov 9, 2016

Conversation

martinholmer
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request changes the names of several policy parameters in order to make them more consistent and to make them conform to the project's policy parameter naming conventions. This pull request combines the content of five closed pull requests: #1040, #1045, #1046, #1047 and #1049.

This pull request does not change any tax-calculation logic, and therefore, does not change any tax results.

@MattHJensen @talumbau @jdebacker @Amy-Xu @GoFroggyRun @andersonfrailey @codykallen

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 9, 2016

Current coverage is 98.73% (diff: 100%)

Merging #1051 into master will not change coverage

@@             master      #1051   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            38         38          
  Lines          2695       2695          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
  Hits           2661       2661          
  Misses           34         34          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update d9dd47d...553535d

@martinholmer martinholmer reopened this Nov 9, 2016
@martinholmer martinholmer merged commit ab12365 into PSLmodels:master Nov 9, 2016
@martinholmer martinholmer deleted the rename-policy-params branch November 9, 2016 22:15
@martinholmer martinholmer mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants