Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix scan source is not none #860

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025
Merged

Fix scan source is not none #860

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

benyissa
Copy link
Member

@benyissa benyissa commented Jan 24, 2025

Purpose of the PR

This PR fixes a bug where a new Scan Source object with all values set to None is unnecessarily persisted when the Scan Source is None.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.87%. Comparing base (fde406f) to head (da3fe9b).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #860   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.87%   62.87%           
=======================================
  Files         342      342           
  Lines       14596    14597    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         9177     9178    +1     
  Misses       5419     5419           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@benyissa benyissa marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2025 14:52
@benyissa benyissa requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2025 14:52
@benyissa benyissa self-assigned this Jan 24, 2025
@benyissa benyissa merged commit 387dfcc into main Jan 24, 2025
12 checks passed
@benyissa benyissa deleted the fix/scan_source_no_none branch January 24, 2025 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants