Alfresco Content Services 23.1 compatibility #215
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aborroy
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2023
|
This PR Seem to work |
AFaust
force-pushed
the
ACS-23.1-compat
branch
from
596b34e to
c713211
Compare
|
After granting myself (the primary maintainer and original author) the project privilege to skip PR requirements, I will be merging it considering the feedback from non-maintainers and the time the PR was already waiting for formal review by other maintainers. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CHECKLIST
We will not consider a PR until the following items are checked off--thank you!
CONVINCING DESCRIPTION
This PR adds compatibility with the ACS 23.1 release. This is done by splitting the log download servlets in Share into distinct Java EE + Jakarta EE-based servlets. The servlets themself remain relevant due to the issues described in the issue #99
RELATED INFORMATION
Fixes #214
Adding @aborroy in addition to reviewers as he offered to help and I reckon he might be able to help in doing some testing.