Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/2485 reimplement intersection strategy for sections and flows #416

Conversation

randy-seng
Copy link
Member

@randy-seng randy-seng commented Dec 6, 2023

OP#2485
OP#3586
OP#3695

… sections and intersection points of tracks and sections
…tes contained by sections

This method will be required when trying to create intersection events with area sections.
…tes contained by sections

This method will be required when trying to create intersection events with area sections.
…ction-strategy-for-sections-and-flows' into feature/2485-reimplement-intersection-strategy-for-sections-and-flows
The track id column is now used as the DataFrame index.
Thus, there is no column for track ids anymore.
Use DataFrame index to access track ids.
… representation of PygeosTrackGeometryDataset
@randy-seng randy-seng requested a review from briemla December 20, 2023 17:51
briemla
briemla previously approved these changes Dec 21, 2023
briemla
briemla previously approved these changes Dec 21, 2023
Copy link
Member Author

@randy-seng randy-seng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@briemla I reviewed your changes! Looks good to me. I also renamed a test class and removed a resolved todo comment.

@randy-seng randy-seng requested a review from briemla January 10, 2024 16:22
@randy-seng randy-seng removed their assignment Jan 10, 2024
@briemla briemla merged commit a55e8a5 into main Jan 10, 2024
@briemla briemla deleted the feature/2485-reimplement-intersection-strategy-for-sections-and-flows branch January 10, 2024 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants